Cargando…
Flow cytometry data standards
BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry is a widely used analytical technique for examining microscopic particles, such as cells. The Flow Cytometry Standard (FCS) was developed in 1984 for storing flow data and it is supported by all instrument and third party software vendors. However, FCS does not capture the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21385382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-50 |
_version_ | 1782200500730462208 |
---|---|
author | Spidlen, Josef Shooshtari, Parisa Kollmann, Tobias R Brinkman, Ryan R |
author_facet | Spidlen, Josef Shooshtari, Parisa Kollmann, Tobias R Brinkman, Ryan R |
author_sort | Spidlen, Josef |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry is a widely used analytical technique for examining microscopic particles, such as cells. The Flow Cytometry Standard (FCS) was developed in 1984 for storing flow data and it is supported by all instrument and third party software vendors. However, FCS does not capture the full scope of flow cytometry (FCM)-related data and metadata, and data standards have recently been developed to address this shortcoming. FINDINGS: The Data Standards Task Force (DSTF) of the International Society for the Advancement of Cytometry (ISAC) has developed several data standards to complement the raw data encoded in FCS files. Efforts started with the Minimum Information about a Flow Cytometry Experiment, a minimal data reporting standard of details necessary to include when publishing FCM experiments to facilitate third party understanding. MIFlowCyt is now being recommended to authors by publishers as part of manuscript submission, and manuscripts are being checked by reviewers and editors for compliance. Gating-ML was then introduced to capture gating descriptions - an essential part of FCM data analysis describing the selection of cell populations of interest. The Classification Results File Format was developed to accommodate results of the gating process, mostly within the context of automated clustering. Additionally, the Archival Cytometry Standard bundles data with all the other components describing experiments. Here, we introduce these recent standards and provide the very first example of how they can be used to report FCM data including analysis and results in a standardized, computationally exchangeable form. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting standards and open file formats are essential for scientific collaboration and independent validation. The recently developed FCM data standards are now being incorporated into third party software tools and data repositories, which will ultimately facilitate understanding and data reuse. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3060130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30601302011-03-18 Flow cytometry data standards Spidlen, Josef Shooshtari, Parisa Kollmann, Tobias R Brinkman, Ryan R BMC Res Notes Data Note BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry is a widely used analytical technique for examining microscopic particles, such as cells. The Flow Cytometry Standard (FCS) was developed in 1984 for storing flow data and it is supported by all instrument and third party software vendors. However, FCS does not capture the full scope of flow cytometry (FCM)-related data and metadata, and data standards have recently been developed to address this shortcoming. FINDINGS: The Data Standards Task Force (DSTF) of the International Society for the Advancement of Cytometry (ISAC) has developed several data standards to complement the raw data encoded in FCS files. Efforts started with the Minimum Information about a Flow Cytometry Experiment, a minimal data reporting standard of details necessary to include when publishing FCM experiments to facilitate third party understanding. MIFlowCyt is now being recommended to authors by publishers as part of manuscript submission, and manuscripts are being checked by reviewers and editors for compliance. Gating-ML was then introduced to capture gating descriptions - an essential part of FCM data analysis describing the selection of cell populations of interest. The Classification Results File Format was developed to accommodate results of the gating process, mostly within the context of automated clustering. Additionally, the Archival Cytometry Standard bundles data with all the other components describing experiments. Here, we introduce these recent standards and provide the very first example of how they can be used to report FCM data including analysis and results in a standardized, computationally exchangeable form. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting standards and open file formats are essential for scientific collaboration and independent validation. The recently developed FCM data standards are now being incorporated into third party software tools and data repositories, which will ultimately facilitate understanding and data reuse. BioMed Central 2011-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3060130/ /pubmed/21385382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-50 Text en Copyright ©2011 Brinkman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Data Note Spidlen, Josef Shooshtari, Parisa Kollmann, Tobias R Brinkman, Ryan R Flow cytometry data standards |
title | Flow cytometry data standards |
title_full | Flow cytometry data standards |
title_fullStr | Flow cytometry data standards |
title_full_unstemmed | Flow cytometry data standards |
title_short | Flow cytometry data standards |
title_sort | flow cytometry data standards |
topic | Data Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21385382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-50 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spidlenjosef flowcytometrydatastandards AT shooshtariparisa flowcytometrydatastandards AT kollmanntobiasr flowcytometrydatastandards AT brinkmanryanr flowcytometrydatastandards |