Cargando…
Telavancin versus Vancomycin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-positive Pathogens
Background. Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide bactericidal against gram-positive pathogens. Methods. Two methodologically identical, double-blind studies (0015 and 0019) were conducted involving patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) due to gram-positive pathogens, particularly methicillin-r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21148517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq031 |
_version_ | 1782200559290286080 |
---|---|
author | Rubinstein, Ethan Lalani, Tahaniyat Corey, G. Ralph Kanafani, Zeina A. Nannini, Esteban C. Rocha, Marcelo G. Rahav, Galia Niederman, Michael S. Kollef, Marin H. Shorr, Andrew F. Lee, Patrick C. Lentnek, Arnold L. Luna, Carlos M. Fagon, Jean-Yves Torres, Antoni Kitt, Michael M. Genter, Fredric C. Barriere, Steven L. Friedland, H. David Stryjewski, Martin E. |
author_facet | Rubinstein, Ethan Lalani, Tahaniyat Corey, G. Ralph Kanafani, Zeina A. Nannini, Esteban C. Rocha, Marcelo G. Rahav, Galia Niederman, Michael S. Kollef, Marin H. Shorr, Andrew F. Lee, Patrick C. Lentnek, Arnold L. Luna, Carlos M. Fagon, Jean-Yves Torres, Antoni Kitt, Michael M. Genter, Fredric C. Barriere, Steven L. Friedland, H. David Stryjewski, Martin E. |
author_sort | Rubinstein, Ethan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide bactericidal against gram-positive pathogens. Methods. Two methodologically identical, double-blind studies (0015 and 0019) were conducted involving patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) due to gram-positive pathogens, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patients were randomized 1:1 to telavancin (10 mg/kg every 24 h) or vancomycin (1 g every 12 h) for 7–21 days. The primary end point was clinical response at follow-up/test-of-cure visit. Results. A total of 1503 patients were randomized and received study medication (the all-treated population). In the pooled all-treated population, cure rates with telavancin versus vancomycin were 58.9% versus 59.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, –5.6% to 4.3%). In the pooled clinically evaluable population (n = 654), cure rates were 82.4% with telavancin and 80.7% with vancomycin (95% CI for the difference, –4.3% to 7.7%). Treatment with telavancin achieved higher cure rates in patients with monomicrobial S. aureus infection and comparable cure rates in patients with MRSA infection; in patients with mixed gram-positive/gram-negative infections, cure rates were higher in the vancomycin group. Incidence and types of adverse events were comparable between the treatment groups. Mortality rates for telavancin-treated versus vancomycin-treated patients were 21.5% versus 16.6% (95% CI for the difference, –0.7% to 10.6%) for study 0015 and 18.5% versus 20.6% (95% CI for the difference, –7.8% to 3.5%) for study 0019. Increases in serum creatinine level were more common in the telavancin group (16% vs 10%). Conclusions. The primary end point of the studies was met, indicating that telavancin is noninferior to vancomycin on the basis of clinical response in the treatment of HAP due to gram-positive pathogens. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3060890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30608902011-03-21 Telavancin versus Vancomycin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-positive Pathogens Rubinstein, Ethan Lalani, Tahaniyat Corey, G. Ralph Kanafani, Zeina A. Nannini, Esteban C. Rocha, Marcelo G. Rahav, Galia Niederman, Michael S. Kollef, Marin H. Shorr, Andrew F. Lee, Patrick C. Lentnek, Arnold L. Luna, Carlos M. Fagon, Jean-Yves Torres, Antoni Kitt, Michael M. Genter, Fredric C. Barriere, Steven L. Friedland, H. David Stryjewski, Martin E. Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries Background. Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide bactericidal against gram-positive pathogens. Methods. Two methodologically identical, double-blind studies (0015 and 0019) were conducted involving patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) due to gram-positive pathogens, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patients were randomized 1:1 to telavancin (10 mg/kg every 24 h) or vancomycin (1 g every 12 h) for 7–21 days. The primary end point was clinical response at follow-up/test-of-cure visit. Results. A total of 1503 patients were randomized and received study medication (the all-treated population). In the pooled all-treated population, cure rates with telavancin versus vancomycin were 58.9% versus 59.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, –5.6% to 4.3%). In the pooled clinically evaluable population (n = 654), cure rates were 82.4% with telavancin and 80.7% with vancomycin (95% CI for the difference, –4.3% to 7.7%). Treatment with telavancin achieved higher cure rates in patients with monomicrobial S. aureus infection and comparable cure rates in patients with MRSA infection; in patients with mixed gram-positive/gram-negative infections, cure rates were higher in the vancomycin group. Incidence and types of adverse events were comparable between the treatment groups. Mortality rates for telavancin-treated versus vancomycin-treated patients were 21.5% versus 16.6% (95% CI for the difference, –0.7% to 10.6%) for study 0015 and 18.5% versus 20.6% (95% CI for the difference, –7.8% to 3.5%) for study 0019. Increases in serum creatinine level were more common in the telavancin group (16% vs 10%). Conclusions. The primary end point of the studies was met, indicating that telavancin is noninferior to vancomycin on the basis of clinical response in the treatment of HAP due to gram-positive pathogens. Oxford University Press 2011-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3060890/ /pubmed/21148517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq031 Text en © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2011. All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles and Commentaries Rubinstein, Ethan Lalani, Tahaniyat Corey, G. Ralph Kanafani, Zeina A. Nannini, Esteban C. Rocha, Marcelo G. Rahav, Galia Niederman, Michael S. Kollef, Marin H. Shorr, Andrew F. Lee, Patrick C. Lentnek, Arnold L. Luna, Carlos M. Fagon, Jean-Yves Torres, Antoni Kitt, Michael M. Genter, Fredric C. Barriere, Steven L. Friedland, H. David Stryjewski, Martin E. Telavancin versus Vancomycin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-positive Pathogens |
title | Telavancin versus Vancomycin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-positive Pathogens |
title_full | Telavancin versus Vancomycin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-positive Pathogens |
title_fullStr | Telavancin versus Vancomycin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-positive Pathogens |
title_full_unstemmed | Telavancin versus Vancomycin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-positive Pathogens |
title_short | Telavancin versus Vancomycin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-positive Pathogens |
title_sort | telavancin versus vancomycin for hospital-acquired pneumonia due to gram-positive pathogens |
topic | Articles and Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21148517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubinsteinethan telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT lalanitahaniyat telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT coreygralph telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT kanafanizeinaa telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT nanniniestebanc telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT rochamarcelog telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT rahavgalia telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT niedermanmichaels telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT kollefmarinh telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT shorrandrewf telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT leepatrickc telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT lentnekarnoldl telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT lunacarlosm telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT fagonjeanyves telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT torresantoni telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT kittmichaelm telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT genterfredricc telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT barrierestevenl telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT friedlandhdavid telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT stryjewskimartine telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens AT telavancinversusvancomycinforhospitalacquiredpneumoniaduetogrampositivepathogens |