Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of 10% HES 130/0.4 versus 10% HES 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3061717/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9507 |
_version_ | 1782200628815069184 |
---|---|
author | Ertmer, C Van Aken, H Wulf, H Friederich, P Mahl, C Bepperling, F Westphal, M Gogarten, W |
author_facet | Ertmer, C Van Aken, H Wulf, H Friederich, P Mahl, C Bepperling, F Westphal, M Gogarten, W |
author_sort | Ertmer, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3061717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30617172011-03-22 Efficacy and safety of 10% HES 130/0.4 versus 10% HES 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients Ertmer, C Van Aken, H Wulf, H Friederich, P Mahl, C Bepperling, F Westphal, M Gogarten, W Crit Care Poster Presentation BioMed Central 2011 2011-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3061717/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9507 Text en Copyright ©2011 Ertmer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Presentation Ertmer, C Van Aken, H Wulf, H Friederich, P Mahl, C Bepperling, F Westphal, M Gogarten, W Efficacy and safety of 10% HES 130/0.4 versus 10% HES 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients |
title | Efficacy and safety of 10% HES 130/0.4 versus 10% HES 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of 10% HES 130/0.4 versus 10% HES 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of 10% HES 130/0.4 versus 10% HES 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of 10% HES 130/0.4 versus 10% HES 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of 10% HES 130/0.4 versus 10% HES 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of 10% hes 130/0.4 versus 10% hes 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients |
topic | Poster Presentation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3061717/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9507 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ertmerc efficacyandsafetyof10hes13004versus10hes20005forplasmavolumeexpansionincardiacsurgerypatients AT vanakenh efficacyandsafetyof10hes13004versus10hes20005forplasmavolumeexpansionincardiacsurgerypatients AT wulfh efficacyandsafetyof10hes13004versus10hes20005forplasmavolumeexpansionincardiacsurgerypatients AT friederichp efficacyandsafetyof10hes13004versus10hes20005forplasmavolumeexpansionincardiacsurgerypatients AT mahlc efficacyandsafetyof10hes13004versus10hes20005forplasmavolumeexpansionincardiacsurgerypatients AT bepperlingf efficacyandsafetyof10hes13004versus10hes20005forplasmavolumeexpansionincardiacsurgerypatients AT westphalm efficacyandsafetyof10hes13004versus10hes20005forplasmavolumeexpansionincardiacsurgerypatients AT gogartenw efficacyandsafetyof10hes13004versus10hes20005forplasmavolumeexpansionincardiacsurgerypatients |