Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of 10% HES 130/0.4 versus 10% HES 200/0.5 for plasma volume expansion in cardiac surgery patients
Autores principales: | Ertmer, C, Van Aken, H, Wulf, H, Friederich, P, Mahl, C, Bepperling, F, Westphal, M, Gogarten, W |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3061717/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9507 |
Ejemplares similares
-
HES 130/0.4, a new HES specification: pharmacokinetics after multiple infusions of 10% solutions in healthy volunteers
por: Bepperling, F, et al.
Publicado: (1999) -
HES 130/0.4, a new HES specification: tissue storage after multiple infusions in rats
por: Bepperling, F, et al.
Publicado: (1999) -
Comparison of 6% HES 130/0.4 in a balanced electrolyte solution versus 6% HES 130/0.4 in saline solution in cardiac surgery
por: Base, E, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Volume substitution therapy with HES 130/0.4 (Voluven(®)) versus HES 450/0.7 (hetastarch) during major orthopedic surgery
por: Gandhi, S, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Prospective observational study for perioperative volume replacement with 6% HES 130/0,42, 4% gelatin and 6% HES 200/0,5 in cardiac surgery
por: Winterhalter, M, et al.
Publicado: (2010)