Cargando…
Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance
PURPOSE: To assess whether black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance is superior to conventional white blood imaging of cardiac iron in patients with thalassaemia major (TM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed both conventional white blood and black blood T2* CMR sequences in 100 TM patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21401929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-21 |
_version_ | 1782200700201074688 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Gillian C Carpenter, John Paul He, Taigang Alam, Mohammed H Firmin, David N Pennell, Dudley J |
author_facet | Smith, Gillian C Carpenter, John Paul He, Taigang Alam, Mohammed H Firmin, David N Pennell, Dudley J |
author_sort | Smith, Gillian C |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess whether black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance is superior to conventional white blood imaging of cardiac iron in patients with thalassaemia major (TM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed both conventional white blood and black blood T2* CMR sequences in 100 TM patients to determine intra and inter-observer variability and presence of artefacts. In 23 patients, 2 separate studies of both techniques were performed to assess interstudy reproducibility. RESULTS: Cardiac T2* values ranged from 4.5 to 43.8 ms. The mean T2* values were not different between black blood and white blood acquisitions (20.5 vs 21.6 ms, p = 0.26). Compared with the conventional white blood diastolic acquisition, the coefficient of variance of the black blood CMR technique was superior for intra-observer reproducibility (1.47% vs 4.23%, p < 0.001), inter-observer reproducibility (2.54% vs 4.50%, p < 0.001) and inter-study reproducibility (4.07% vs 8.42%, p = 0.001). Assessment of artefacts showed a superior score for black blood vs white blood scans (4.57 vs 4.25; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Black blood T2* CMR has superior reproducibility and reduced imaging artefacts for the assessment of cardiac iron, in comparison with the conventional white blood technique, which make it the preferred technique for clinical practice. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3062187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30621872011-03-23 Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance Smith, Gillian C Carpenter, John Paul He, Taigang Alam, Mohammed H Firmin, David N Pennell, Dudley J J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Technical Notes PURPOSE: To assess whether black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance is superior to conventional white blood imaging of cardiac iron in patients with thalassaemia major (TM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed both conventional white blood and black blood T2* CMR sequences in 100 TM patients to determine intra and inter-observer variability and presence of artefacts. In 23 patients, 2 separate studies of both techniques were performed to assess interstudy reproducibility. RESULTS: Cardiac T2* values ranged from 4.5 to 43.8 ms. The mean T2* values were not different between black blood and white blood acquisitions (20.5 vs 21.6 ms, p = 0.26). Compared with the conventional white blood diastolic acquisition, the coefficient of variance of the black blood CMR technique was superior for intra-observer reproducibility (1.47% vs 4.23%, p < 0.001), inter-observer reproducibility (2.54% vs 4.50%, p < 0.001) and inter-study reproducibility (4.07% vs 8.42%, p = 0.001). Assessment of artefacts showed a superior score for black blood vs white blood scans (4.57 vs 4.25; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Black blood T2* CMR has superior reproducibility and reduced imaging artefacts for the assessment of cardiac iron, in comparison with the conventional white blood technique, which make it the preferred technique for clinical practice. BioMed Central 2011-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3062187/ /pubmed/21401929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-21 Text en Copyright ©2011 Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Smith, Gillian C Carpenter, John Paul He, Taigang Alam, Mohammed H Firmin, David N Pennell, Dudley J Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title | Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_full | Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_fullStr | Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_full_unstemmed | Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_short | Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_sort | value of black blood t2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21401929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithgillianc valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance AT carpenterjohnpaul valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance AT hetaigang valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance AT alammohammedh valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance AT firmindavidn valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance AT pennelldudleyj valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance |