Cargando…

Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance

PURPOSE: To assess whether black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance is superior to conventional white blood imaging of cardiac iron in patients with thalassaemia major (TM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed both conventional white blood and black blood T2* CMR sequences in 100 TM patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Gillian C, Carpenter, John Paul, He, Taigang, Alam, Mohammed H, Firmin, David N, Pennell, Dudley J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21401929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-21
_version_ 1782200700201074688
author Smith, Gillian C
Carpenter, John Paul
He, Taigang
Alam, Mohammed H
Firmin, David N
Pennell, Dudley J
author_facet Smith, Gillian C
Carpenter, John Paul
He, Taigang
Alam, Mohammed H
Firmin, David N
Pennell, Dudley J
author_sort Smith, Gillian C
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess whether black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance is superior to conventional white blood imaging of cardiac iron in patients with thalassaemia major (TM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed both conventional white blood and black blood T2* CMR sequences in 100 TM patients to determine intra and inter-observer variability and presence of artefacts. In 23 patients, 2 separate studies of both techniques were performed to assess interstudy reproducibility. RESULTS: Cardiac T2* values ranged from 4.5 to 43.8 ms. The mean T2* values were not different between black blood and white blood acquisitions (20.5 vs 21.6 ms, p = 0.26). Compared with the conventional white blood diastolic acquisition, the coefficient of variance of the black blood CMR technique was superior for intra-observer reproducibility (1.47% vs 4.23%, p < 0.001), inter-observer reproducibility (2.54% vs 4.50%, p < 0.001) and inter-study reproducibility (4.07% vs 8.42%, p = 0.001). Assessment of artefacts showed a superior score for black blood vs white blood scans (4.57 vs 4.25; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Black blood T2* CMR has superior reproducibility and reduced imaging artefacts for the assessment of cardiac iron, in comparison with the conventional white blood technique, which make it the preferred technique for clinical practice.
format Text
id pubmed-3062187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30621872011-03-23 Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance Smith, Gillian C Carpenter, John Paul He, Taigang Alam, Mohammed H Firmin, David N Pennell, Dudley J J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Technical Notes PURPOSE: To assess whether black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance is superior to conventional white blood imaging of cardiac iron in patients with thalassaemia major (TM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed both conventional white blood and black blood T2* CMR sequences in 100 TM patients to determine intra and inter-observer variability and presence of artefacts. In 23 patients, 2 separate studies of both techniques were performed to assess interstudy reproducibility. RESULTS: Cardiac T2* values ranged from 4.5 to 43.8 ms. The mean T2* values were not different between black blood and white blood acquisitions (20.5 vs 21.6 ms, p = 0.26). Compared with the conventional white blood diastolic acquisition, the coefficient of variance of the black blood CMR technique was superior for intra-observer reproducibility (1.47% vs 4.23%, p < 0.001), inter-observer reproducibility (2.54% vs 4.50%, p < 0.001) and inter-study reproducibility (4.07% vs 8.42%, p = 0.001). Assessment of artefacts showed a superior score for black blood vs white blood scans (4.57 vs 4.25; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Black blood T2* CMR has superior reproducibility and reduced imaging artefacts for the assessment of cardiac iron, in comparison with the conventional white blood technique, which make it the preferred technique for clinical practice. BioMed Central 2011-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3062187/ /pubmed/21401929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-21 Text en Copyright ©2011 Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Smith, Gillian C
Carpenter, John Paul
He, Taigang
Alam, Mohammed H
Firmin, David N
Pennell, Dudley J
Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_fullStr Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full_unstemmed Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_short Value of black blood T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_sort value of black blood t2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21401929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-21
work_keys_str_mv AT smithgillianc valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT carpenterjohnpaul valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT hetaigang valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT alammohammedh valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT firmindavidn valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT pennelldudleyj valueofblackbloodt2cardiovascularmagneticresonance