Cargando…

Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Surveillance Paradigm for Complications of Mechanical Ventilation

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) surveillance is time consuming, subjective, inaccurate, and inconsistently predicts outcomes. Shifting surveillance from pneumonia in particular to complications in general might circumvent the VAP definition's subjectivity and inaccuracy, facil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klompas, Michael, Khan, Yosef, Kleinman, Kenneth, Evans, R. Scott, Lloyd, James F., Stevenson, Kurt, Samore, Matthew, Platt, Richard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21445364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018062
_version_ 1782200720245653504
author Klompas, Michael
Khan, Yosef
Kleinman, Kenneth
Evans, R. Scott
Lloyd, James F.
Stevenson, Kurt
Samore, Matthew
Platt, Richard
author_facet Klompas, Michael
Khan, Yosef
Kleinman, Kenneth
Evans, R. Scott
Lloyd, James F.
Stevenson, Kurt
Samore, Matthew
Platt, Richard
author_sort Klompas, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) surveillance is time consuming, subjective, inaccurate, and inconsistently predicts outcomes. Shifting surveillance from pneumonia in particular to complications in general might circumvent the VAP definition's subjectivity and inaccuracy, facilitate electronic assessment, make interfacility comparisons more meaningful, and encourage broader prevention strategies. We therefore evaluated a novel surveillance paradigm for ventilator-associated complications (VAC) defined by sustained increases in patients' ventilator settings after a period of stable or decreasing support. METHODS: We assessed 600 mechanically ventilated medical and surgical patients from three hospitals. Each hospital contributed 100 randomly selected patients ventilated 2–7 days and 100 patients ventilated >7 days. All patients were independently assessed for VAP and for VAC. We compared incidence-density, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital lengths of stay, hospital mortality, and time required for surveillance for VAP and for VAC. A subset of patients with VAP and VAC were independently reviewed by a physician to determine possible etiology. RESULTS: Of 597 evaluable patients, 9.3% had VAP (8.8 per 1,000 ventilator days) and 23% had VAC (21.2 per 1,000 ventilator days). Compared to matched controls, both VAP and VAC prolonged days to extubation (5.8, 95% CI 4.2–8.0 and 6.0, 95% CI 5.1–7.1 respectively), days to intensive care discharge (5.7, 95% CI 4.2–7.7 and 5.0, 95% CI 4.1–5.9), and days to hospital discharge (4.7, 95% CI 2.6–7.5 and 3.0, 95% CI 2.1–4.0). VAC was associated with increased mortality (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3–3.2) but VAP was not (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5–2.4). VAC assessment was faster (mean 1.8 versus 39 minutes per patient). Both VAP and VAC events were predominantly attributable to pneumonia, pulmonary edema, ARDS, and atelectasis. CONCLUSIONS: Screening ventilator settings for VAC captures a similar set of complications to traditional VAP surveillance but is faster, more objective, and a superior predictor of outcomes.
format Text
id pubmed-3062570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30625702011-03-28 Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Surveillance Paradigm for Complications of Mechanical Ventilation Klompas, Michael Khan, Yosef Kleinman, Kenneth Evans, R. Scott Lloyd, James F. Stevenson, Kurt Samore, Matthew Platt, Richard PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) surveillance is time consuming, subjective, inaccurate, and inconsistently predicts outcomes. Shifting surveillance from pneumonia in particular to complications in general might circumvent the VAP definition's subjectivity and inaccuracy, facilitate electronic assessment, make interfacility comparisons more meaningful, and encourage broader prevention strategies. We therefore evaluated a novel surveillance paradigm for ventilator-associated complications (VAC) defined by sustained increases in patients' ventilator settings after a period of stable or decreasing support. METHODS: We assessed 600 mechanically ventilated medical and surgical patients from three hospitals. Each hospital contributed 100 randomly selected patients ventilated 2–7 days and 100 patients ventilated >7 days. All patients were independently assessed for VAP and for VAC. We compared incidence-density, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital lengths of stay, hospital mortality, and time required for surveillance for VAP and for VAC. A subset of patients with VAP and VAC were independently reviewed by a physician to determine possible etiology. RESULTS: Of 597 evaluable patients, 9.3% had VAP (8.8 per 1,000 ventilator days) and 23% had VAC (21.2 per 1,000 ventilator days). Compared to matched controls, both VAP and VAC prolonged days to extubation (5.8, 95% CI 4.2–8.0 and 6.0, 95% CI 5.1–7.1 respectively), days to intensive care discharge (5.7, 95% CI 4.2–7.7 and 5.0, 95% CI 4.1–5.9), and days to hospital discharge (4.7, 95% CI 2.6–7.5 and 3.0, 95% CI 2.1–4.0). VAC was associated with increased mortality (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3–3.2) but VAP was not (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5–2.4). VAC assessment was faster (mean 1.8 versus 39 minutes per patient). Both VAP and VAC events were predominantly attributable to pneumonia, pulmonary edema, ARDS, and atelectasis. CONCLUSIONS: Screening ventilator settings for VAC captures a similar set of complications to traditional VAP surveillance but is faster, more objective, and a superior predictor of outcomes. Public Library of Science 2011-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3062570/ /pubmed/21445364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018062 Text en Klompas et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Klompas, Michael
Khan, Yosef
Kleinman, Kenneth
Evans, R. Scott
Lloyd, James F.
Stevenson, Kurt
Samore, Matthew
Platt, Richard
Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Surveillance Paradigm for Complications of Mechanical Ventilation
title Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Surveillance Paradigm for Complications of Mechanical Ventilation
title_full Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Surveillance Paradigm for Complications of Mechanical Ventilation
title_fullStr Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Surveillance Paradigm for Complications of Mechanical Ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Surveillance Paradigm for Complications of Mechanical Ventilation
title_short Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Surveillance Paradigm for Complications of Mechanical Ventilation
title_sort multicenter evaluation of a novel surveillance paradigm for complications of mechanical ventilation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21445364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018062
work_keys_str_mv AT klompasmichael multicenterevaluationofanovelsurveillanceparadigmforcomplicationsofmechanicalventilation
AT khanyosef multicenterevaluationofanovelsurveillanceparadigmforcomplicationsofmechanicalventilation
AT kleinmankenneth multicenterevaluationofanovelsurveillanceparadigmforcomplicationsofmechanicalventilation
AT evansrscott multicenterevaluationofanovelsurveillanceparadigmforcomplicationsofmechanicalventilation
AT lloydjamesf multicenterevaluationofanovelsurveillanceparadigmforcomplicationsofmechanicalventilation
AT stevensonkurt multicenterevaluationofanovelsurveillanceparadigmforcomplicationsofmechanicalventilation
AT samorematthew multicenterevaluationofanovelsurveillanceparadigmforcomplicationsofmechanicalventilation
AT plattrichard multicenterevaluationofanovelsurveillanceparadigmforcomplicationsofmechanicalventilation
AT multicenterevaluationofanovelsurveillanceparadigmforcomplicationsofmechanicalventilation