Cargando…

Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to assess the utility of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in diagnosing fungal keratitis in the last decade in our center and to review the molecular diagnosis of mycotic keratitis. METHODS: A retrospective nonrandomized investigation was undertaken at Vissum Corp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrer, Consuelo, Alió, Jorge L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12348-011-0019-9
_version_ 1782200736903331840
author Ferrer, Consuelo
Alió, Jorge L.
author_facet Ferrer, Consuelo
Alió, Jorge L.
author_sort Ferrer, Consuelo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to assess the utility of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in diagnosing fungal keratitis in the last decade in our center and to review the molecular diagnosis of mycotic keratitis. METHODS: A retrospective nonrandomized investigation was undertaken at Vissum Corporación Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante to evaluate 27 corneal samples of 20 patients with proven fungal keratitis from January 2000 to December 2009. Corneal samples (21 corneal scrapings, 5 biopsies, and 1 cornea) were evaluated by Gram stain or calcofluor stain, culture, and PCR. The detection and molecular identification were carried out by DNA amplification and sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer and 5.8S rRNA region from the corneal samples. RESULTS: PCR detected all the samples that were positive by conventional methods. Four samples were positive by PCR and showed negative results by culture and stain. Combination of microscopy and culture gave positive results in 21 of the 27 samples of patients with mycotic keratitis. Stains showed a 66.7% of positive results, culture showed 59.3%, and PCR showed 92.6%. The time taken for PCR assay was 4 to 8 h whereas positive fungal cultures took 1 to 35 days. Identification at species level by molecular methods was possible in all cases except one. Identification at species level by conventional methods only was possible in eight cases. CONCLUSIONS: PCR not only proved to be an effective rapid method for the diagnosis of fungal keratitis but was also more sensitive than stain and culture methods. Fungal PCR must be added as the screening diagnosis test when an early mycotic keratitis is suspected. Molecular identification is the gold standard technique for the identification of corneal fungal pathogens.
format Text
id pubmed-3062769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30627692011-04-05 Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience Ferrer, Consuelo Alió, Jorge L. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect Original Research PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to assess the utility of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in diagnosing fungal keratitis in the last decade in our center and to review the molecular diagnosis of mycotic keratitis. METHODS: A retrospective nonrandomized investigation was undertaken at Vissum Corporación Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante to evaluate 27 corneal samples of 20 patients with proven fungal keratitis from January 2000 to December 2009. Corneal samples (21 corneal scrapings, 5 biopsies, and 1 cornea) were evaluated by Gram stain or calcofluor stain, culture, and PCR. The detection and molecular identification were carried out by DNA amplification and sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer and 5.8S rRNA region from the corneal samples. RESULTS: PCR detected all the samples that were positive by conventional methods. Four samples were positive by PCR and showed negative results by culture and stain. Combination of microscopy and culture gave positive results in 21 of the 27 samples of patients with mycotic keratitis. Stains showed a 66.7% of positive results, culture showed 59.3%, and PCR showed 92.6%. The time taken for PCR assay was 4 to 8 h whereas positive fungal cultures took 1 to 35 days. Identification at species level by molecular methods was possible in all cases except one. Identification at species level by conventional methods only was possible in eight cases. CONCLUSIONS: PCR not only proved to be an effective rapid method for the diagnosis of fungal keratitis but was also more sensitive than stain and culture methods. Fungal PCR must be added as the screening diagnosis test when an early mycotic keratitis is suspected. Molecular identification is the gold standard technique for the identification of corneal fungal pathogens. Springer-Verlag 2011-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3062769/ /pubmed/21475656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12348-011-0019-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ferrer, Consuelo
Alió, Jorge L.
Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience
title Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience
title_full Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience
title_fullStr Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience
title_short Evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. Ten years of experience
title_sort evaluation of molecular diagnosis in fungal keratitis. ten years of experience
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12348-011-0019-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrerconsuelo evaluationofmoleculardiagnosisinfungalkeratitistenyearsofexperience
AT aliojorgel evaluationofmoleculardiagnosisinfungalkeratitistenyearsofexperience