Cargando…

Pathogen Quantitation in Complex Matrices: A Multi-Operator Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods with a Novel Assessment of PCR Inhibition

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium bovis is the aetiological agent of bovine tuberculosis (bTB), an important recrudescent zoonosis, significantly increasing in British herds in recent years. Wildlife reservoirs have been identified for this disease but the mode of transmission to cattle remains unclear. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pontiroli, Alessandra, Travis, Emma Rachel, Sweeney, Francis Patrick, Porter, David, Gaze, William Hugo, Mason, Sam, Hibberd, Victoria, Holden, Jennifer, Courtenay, Orin, Wellington, Elizabeth Margaret Helen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017916
_version_ 1782200770458812416
author Pontiroli, Alessandra
Travis, Emma Rachel
Sweeney, Francis Patrick
Porter, David
Gaze, William Hugo
Mason, Sam
Hibberd, Victoria
Holden, Jennifer
Courtenay, Orin
Wellington, Elizabeth Margaret Helen
author_facet Pontiroli, Alessandra
Travis, Emma Rachel
Sweeney, Francis Patrick
Porter, David
Gaze, William Hugo
Mason, Sam
Hibberd, Victoria
Holden, Jennifer
Courtenay, Orin
Wellington, Elizabeth Margaret Helen
author_sort Pontiroli, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium bovis is the aetiological agent of bovine tuberculosis (bTB), an important recrudescent zoonosis, significantly increasing in British herds in recent years. Wildlife reservoirs have been identified for this disease but the mode of transmission to cattle remains unclear. There is evidence that viable M. bovis cells can survive in soil and faeces for over a year. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We report a multi-operator blinded trial for a rigorous comparison of five DNA extraction methods from a variety of soil and faecal samples to assess recovery of M. bovis via real-time PCR detection. The methods included four commercial kits: the QIAamp Stool Mini kit with a pre-treatment step, the FastDNA® Spin kit, the UltraClean™ and PowerSoil™ soil kits and a published manual method based on phenol:chloroform purification, termed Griffiths. M. bovis BCG Pasteur spiked samples were extracted by four operators and evaluated using a specific real-time PCR assay. A novel inhibition control assay was used alongside spectrophotometric ratios to monitor the level of inhibitory compounds affecting PCR, DNA yield, and purity. There were statistically significant differences in M. bovis detection between methods of extraction and types of environmental samples; no significant differences were observed between operators. Processing times and costs were also evaluated. To improve M. bovis detection further, the two best performing methods, FastDNA® Spin kit and Griffiths, were optimised and the ABI TaqMan environmental PCR Master mix was adopted, leading to improved sensitivities. CONCLUSIONS: M. bovis was successfully detected in all environmental samples; DNA extraction using FastDNA® Spin kit was the most sensitive method with highest recoveries from all soil types tested. For troublesome faecal samples, we have used and recommend an improved assay based on a reduced volume, resulting in detection limits of 4.25×10(5) cells g(−1) using Griffiths and 4.25×10(6) cells g(−1) using FastDNA® Spin kit.
format Text
id pubmed-3063169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30631692011-03-28 Pathogen Quantitation in Complex Matrices: A Multi-Operator Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods with a Novel Assessment of PCR Inhibition Pontiroli, Alessandra Travis, Emma Rachel Sweeney, Francis Patrick Porter, David Gaze, William Hugo Mason, Sam Hibberd, Victoria Holden, Jennifer Courtenay, Orin Wellington, Elizabeth Margaret Helen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium bovis is the aetiological agent of bovine tuberculosis (bTB), an important recrudescent zoonosis, significantly increasing in British herds in recent years. Wildlife reservoirs have been identified for this disease but the mode of transmission to cattle remains unclear. There is evidence that viable M. bovis cells can survive in soil and faeces for over a year. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We report a multi-operator blinded trial for a rigorous comparison of five DNA extraction methods from a variety of soil and faecal samples to assess recovery of M. bovis via real-time PCR detection. The methods included four commercial kits: the QIAamp Stool Mini kit with a pre-treatment step, the FastDNA® Spin kit, the UltraClean™ and PowerSoil™ soil kits and a published manual method based on phenol:chloroform purification, termed Griffiths. M. bovis BCG Pasteur spiked samples were extracted by four operators and evaluated using a specific real-time PCR assay. A novel inhibition control assay was used alongside spectrophotometric ratios to monitor the level of inhibitory compounds affecting PCR, DNA yield, and purity. There were statistically significant differences in M. bovis detection between methods of extraction and types of environmental samples; no significant differences were observed between operators. Processing times and costs were also evaluated. To improve M. bovis detection further, the two best performing methods, FastDNA® Spin kit and Griffiths, were optimised and the ABI TaqMan environmental PCR Master mix was adopted, leading to improved sensitivities. CONCLUSIONS: M. bovis was successfully detected in all environmental samples; DNA extraction using FastDNA® Spin kit was the most sensitive method with highest recoveries from all soil types tested. For troublesome faecal samples, we have used and recommend an improved assay based on a reduced volume, resulting in detection limits of 4.25×10(5) cells g(−1) using Griffiths and 4.25×10(6) cells g(−1) using FastDNA® Spin kit. Public Library of Science 2011-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3063169/ /pubmed/21448453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017916 Text en Pontiroli et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pontiroli, Alessandra
Travis, Emma Rachel
Sweeney, Francis Patrick
Porter, David
Gaze, William Hugo
Mason, Sam
Hibberd, Victoria
Holden, Jennifer
Courtenay, Orin
Wellington, Elizabeth Margaret Helen
Pathogen Quantitation in Complex Matrices: A Multi-Operator Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods with a Novel Assessment of PCR Inhibition
title Pathogen Quantitation in Complex Matrices: A Multi-Operator Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods with a Novel Assessment of PCR Inhibition
title_full Pathogen Quantitation in Complex Matrices: A Multi-Operator Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods with a Novel Assessment of PCR Inhibition
title_fullStr Pathogen Quantitation in Complex Matrices: A Multi-Operator Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods with a Novel Assessment of PCR Inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Pathogen Quantitation in Complex Matrices: A Multi-Operator Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods with a Novel Assessment of PCR Inhibition
title_short Pathogen Quantitation in Complex Matrices: A Multi-Operator Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods with a Novel Assessment of PCR Inhibition
title_sort pathogen quantitation in complex matrices: a multi-operator comparison of dna extraction methods with a novel assessment of pcr inhibition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017916
work_keys_str_mv AT pontirolialessandra pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition
AT travisemmarachel pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition
AT sweeneyfrancispatrick pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition
AT porterdavid pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition
AT gazewilliamhugo pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition
AT masonsam pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition
AT hibberdvictoria pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition
AT holdenjennifer pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition
AT courtenayorin pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition
AT wellingtonelizabethmargarethelen pathogenquantitationincomplexmatricesamultioperatorcomparisonofdnaextractionmethodswithanovelassessmentofpcrinhibition