Cargando…
Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement
Nearly 15 million people in the United States suffer from either aortic or mitral valvular disease. For patients with severe and symptomatic valvular heart disease, valve replacement surgery improves morbidity and mortality outcomes. In 2009, 90,000 valve replacement surgeries were performed in the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448466 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S16420 |
_version_ | 1782200819686309888 |
---|---|
author | Tillquist, Maggie N Maddox, Thomas M |
author_facet | Tillquist, Maggie N Maddox, Thomas M |
author_sort | Tillquist, Maggie N |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nearly 15 million people in the United States suffer from either aortic or mitral valvular disease. For patients with severe and symptomatic valvular heart disease, valve replacement surgery improves morbidity and mortality outcomes. In 2009, 90,000 valve replacement surgeries were performed in the United States. This review evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of mechanical and bioprosthetic prosthetic heart valves as well as the factors for consideration in deciding the appropriate valve type for an individual patient. Although many caveats exist, the general recommendation is for patients younger than 60 to 65 years to receive mechanical valves due to the valve’s longer durability and for patients older than 60 to 65 years to receive a bioprosthetic valve to avoid complications with anticoagulants. Situations that warrant special consideration include patient co-morbidities, the need for anticoagulation, and the potential for pregnancy. Once these characteristics have been considered, patients’ values, anxieties, and expectations for their lifestyle and quality of life should be incorporated into final valve selection. Decision aids can be useful in integrating preferences in the valve decision. Finally, future directions in valve technology, anticoagulation, and medical decision-making are discussed. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3063655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30636552011-03-29 Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement Tillquist, Maggie N Maddox, Thomas M Patient Prefer Adherence Review Nearly 15 million people in the United States suffer from either aortic or mitral valvular disease. For patients with severe and symptomatic valvular heart disease, valve replacement surgery improves morbidity and mortality outcomes. In 2009, 90,000 valve replacement surgeries were performed in the United States. This review evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of mechanical and bioprosthetic prosthetic heart valves as well as the factors for consideration in deciding the appropriate valve type for an individual patient. Although many caveats exist, the general recommendation is for patients younger than 60 to 65 years to receive mechanical valves due to the valve’s longer durability and for patients older than 60 to 65 years to receive a bioprosthetic valve to avoid complications with anticoagulants. Situations that warrant special consideration include patient co-morbidities, the need for anticoagulation, and the potential for pregnancy. Once these characteristics have been considered, patients’ values, anxieties, and expectations for their lifestyle and quality of life should be incorporated into final valve selection. Decision aids can be useful in integrating preferences in the valve decision. Finally, future directions in valve technology, anticoagulation, and medical decision-making are discussed. Dove Medical Press 2011-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3063655/ /pubmed/21448466 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S16420 Text en © 2011 Tillquist and Maddox, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Tillquist, Maggie N Maddox, Thomas M Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement |
title | Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement |
title_full | Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement |
title_fullStr | Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement |
title_short | Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement |
title_sort | cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448466 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S16420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tillquistmaggien cardiaccrossroadsdecidingbetweenmechanicalorbioprostheticheartvalvereplacement AT maddoxthomasm cardiaccrossroadsdecidingbetweenmechanicalorbioprostheticheartvalvereplacement |