Cargando…
Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy
BACKGROUND: We aimed to validate prognostic scores for survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic cancer after first-line treatment. METHODS: We previously described two models with good prognostic value based on a combination of Performance Status (PS) and either lactat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21406082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-95 |
_version_ | 1782200839240155136 |
---|---|
author | Trédan, Olivier Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Chvetzoff, Gisèle Rebattu, Paul Bajard, Agathe Chabaud, Sylvie Pérol, David Saba, Chadi Quiblier, Florent Blay, Jean-Yves Bachelot, Thomas |
author_facet | Trédan, Olivier Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Chvetzoff, Gisèle Rebattu, Paul Bajard, Agathe Chabaud, Sylvie Pérol, David Saba, Chadi Quiblier, Florent Blay, Jean-Yves Bachelot, Thomas |
author_sort | Trédan, Olivier |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to validate prognostic scores for survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic cancer after first-line treatment. METHODS: We previously described two models with good prognostic value based on a combination of Performance Status (PS) and either lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level or lymphocyte count. These factors were evaluated for their ability to predict overall survival (OS) in a prospective cohort of 299 patients. Clinical and blood parameters were prospectively recorded. Candidate prognostic factors for OS with 0.05 significance level in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: Median age was 59 years (range: 26-85). Primary tumor sites were breast (45%), lung (15%), ovaries (11%) and others (29%). The number of metastatic sites was 1 (29%), 2 (48%), >2 (23%). Median follow-up and median OS were 12 and 6 months, respectively. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that PS >1, lymphocyte count ≤700/μL and LDH >600 UI/L were independent predictors of short OS, as well as interleukin 6 (IL-6) level, serum albumin concentration and platelet count. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic scores using PS plus LDH level or PS plus lymphocyte count were validated for predicting survival in metastatic cancer patients in relapse beyond first-line treatment. A score combining PS, LDH, lymphocyte and platelet count, serum albumin and IL-6 level was superior in determining patients' prognosis. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3063819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30638192011-03-25 Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy Trédan, Olivier Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Chvetzoff, Gisèle Rebattu, Paul Bajard, Agathe Chabaud, Sylvie Pérol, David Saba, Chadi Quiblier, Florent Blay, Jean-Yves Bachelot, Thomas BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to validate prognostic scores for survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic cancer after first-line treatment. METHODS: We previously described two models with good prognostic value based on a combination of Performance Status (PS) and either lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level or lymphocyte count. These factors were evaluated for their ability to predict overall survival (OS) in a prospective cohort of 299 patients. Clinical and blood parameters were prospectively recorded. Candidate prognostic factors for OS with 0.05 significance level in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: Median age was 59 years (range: 26-85). Primary tumor sites were breast (45%), lung (15%), ovaries (11%) and others (29%). The number of metastatic sites was 1 (29%), 2 (48%), >2 (23%). Median follow-up and median OS were 12 and 6 months, respectively. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that PS >1, lymphocyte count ≤700/μL and LDH >600 UI/L were independent predictors of short OS, as well as interleukin 6 (IL-6) level, serum albumin concentration and platelet count. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic scores using PS plus LDH level or PS plus lymphocyte count were validated for predicting survival in metastatic cancer patients in relapse beyond first-line treatment. A score combining PS, LDH, lymphocyte and platelet count, serum albumin and IL-6 level was superior in determining patients' prognosis. BioMed Central 2011-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3063819/ /pubmed/21406082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-95 Text en Copyright ©2011 Trédan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Trédan, Olivier Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Chvetzoff, Gisèle Rebattu, Paul Bajard, Agathe Chabaud, Sylvie Pérol, David Saba, Chadi Quiblier, Florent Blay, Jean-Yves Bachelot, Thomas Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy |
title | Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy |
title_full | Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy |
title_fullStr | Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy |
title_short | Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy |
title_sort | validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21406082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-95 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tredanolivier validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT raycoquardisabelle validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT chvetzoffgisele validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT rebattupaul validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT bajardagathe validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT chabaudsylvie validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT peroldavid validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT sabachadi validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT quiblierflorent validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT blayjeanyves validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy AT bachelotthomas validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy |