Cargando…

Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy

BACKGROUND: We aimed to validate prognostic scores for survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic cancer after first-line treatment. METHODS: We previously described two models with good prognostic value based on a combination of Performance Status (PS) and either lactat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trédan, Olivier, Ray-Coquard, Isabelle, Chvetzoff, Gisèle, Rebattu, Paul, Bajard, Agathe, Chabaud, Sylvie, Pérol, David, Saba, Chadi, Quiblier, Florent, Blay, Jean-Yves, Bachelot, Thomas
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21406082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-95
_version_ 1782200839240155136
author Trédan, Olivier
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Chvetzoff, Gisèle
Rebattu, Paul
Bajard, Agathe
Chabaud, Sylvie
Pérol, David
Saba, Chadi
Quiblier, Florent
Blay, Jean-Yves
Bachelot, Thomas
author_facet Trédan, Olivier
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Chvetzoff, Gisèle
Rebattu, Paul
Bajard, Agathe
Chabaud, Sylvie
Pérol, David
Saba, Chadi
Quiblier, Florent
Blay, Jean-Yves
Bachelot, Thomas
author_sort Trédan, Olivier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to validate prognostic scores for survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic cancer after first-line treatment. METHODS: We previously described two models with good prognostic value based on a combination of Performance Status (PS) and either lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level or lymphocyte count. These factors were evaluated for their ability to predict overall survival (OS) in a prospective cohort of 299 patients. Clinical and blood parameters were prospectively recorded. Candidate prognostic factors for OS with 0.05 significance level in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: Median age was 59 years (range: 26-85). Primary tumor sites were breast (45%), lung (15%), ovaries (11%) and others (29%). The number of metastatic sites was 1 (29%), 2 (48%), >2 (23%). Median follow-up and median OS were 12 and 6 months, respectively. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that PS >1, lymphocyte count ≤700/μL and LDH >600 UI/L were independent predictors of short OS, as well as interleukin 6 (IL-6) level, serum albumin concentration and platelet count. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic scores using PS plus LDH level or PS plus lymphocyte count were validated for predicting survival in metastatic cancer patients in relapse beyond first-line treatment. A score combining PS, LDH, lymphocyte and platelet count, serum albumin and IL-6 level was superior in determining patients' prognosis.
format Text
id pubmed-3063819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30638192011-03-25 Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy Trédan, Olivier Ray-Coquard, Isabelle Chvetzoff, Gisèle Rebattu, Paul Bajard, Agathe Chabaud, Sylvie Pérol, David Saba, Chadi Quiblier, Florent Blay, Jean-Yves Bachelot, Thomas BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to validate prognostic scores for survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic cancer after first-line treatment. METHODS: We previously described two models with good prognostic value based on a combination of Performance Status (PS) and either lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level or lymphocyte count. These factors were evaluated for their ability to predict overall survival (OS) in a prospective cohort of 299 patients. Clinical and blood parameters were prospectively recorded. Candidate prognostic factors for OS with 0.05 significance level in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: Median age was 59 years (range: 26-85). Primary tumor sites were breast (45%), lung (15%), ovaries (11%) and others (29%). The number of metastatic sites was 1 (29%), 2 (48%), >2 (23%). Median follow-up and median OS were 12 and 6 months, respectively. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that PS >1, lymphocyte count ≤700/μL and LDH >600 UI/L were independent predictors of short OS, as well as interleukin 6 (IL-6) level, serum albumin concentration and platelet count. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic scores using PS plus LDH level or PS plus lymphocyte count were validated for predicting survival in metastatic cancer patients in relapse beyond first-line treatment. A score combining PS, LDH, lymphocyte and platelet count, serum albumin and IL-6 level was superior in determining patients' prognosis. BioMed Central 2011-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3063819/ /pubmed/21406082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-95 Text en Copyright ©2011 Trédan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Trédan, Olivier
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Chvetzoff, Gisèle
Rebattu, Paul
Bajard, Agathe
Chabaud, Sylvie
Pérol, David
Saba, Chadi
Quiblier, Florent
Blay, Jean-Yves
Bachelot, Thomas
Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy
title Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy
title_full Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy
title_fullStr Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy
title_full_unstemmed Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy
title_short Validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy
title_sort validation of prognostic scores for survival in cancer patients beyond first-line therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21406082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-95
work_keys_str_mv AT tredanolivier validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT raycoquardisabelle validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT chvetzoffgisele validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT rebattupaul validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT bajardagathe validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT chabaudsylvie validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT peroldavid validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT sabachadi validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT quiblierflorent validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT blayjeanyves validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy
AT bachelotthomas validationofprognosticscoresforsurvivalincancerpatientsbeyondfirstlinetherapy