Cargando…

What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine?

The medical writings of early medieval western Europe c. 700 – c. 1000 have often been derided for their disorganised appearance, poor Latin, nebulous conceptual framework, admixtures of magic and folklore, and general lack of those positive features that historians attribute to ancient or later med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Horden, Peregrine
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063953/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkp052
_version_ 1782200855020175360
author Horden, Peregrine
author_facet Horden, Peregrine
author_sort Horden, Peregrine
collection PubMed
description The medical writings of early medieval western Europe c. 700 – c. 1000 have often been derided for their disorganised appearance, poor Latin, nebulous conceptual framework, admixtures of magic and folklore, and general lack of those positive features that historians attribute to ancient or later medieval medicine. This paper attempts to rescue the period from its negative image. It examines a number of superficially bizarre writings so as to place them in an intellectual and sociological context, and to suggest that the presumed contrast between them and their ancient and later medieval counterparts has been wrongly drawn.
format Text
id pubmed-3063953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30639532011-03-28 What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine? Horden, Peregrine Soc Hist Med Original Articles The medical writings of early medieval western Europe c. 700 – c. 1000 have often been derided for their disorganised appearance, poor Latin, nebulous conceptual framework, admixtures of magic and folklore, and general lack of those positive features that historians attribute to ancient or later medieval medicine. This paper attempts to rescue the period from its negative image. It examines a number of superficially bizarre writings so as to place them in an intellectual and sociological context, and to suggest that the presumed contrast between them and their ancient and later medieval counterparts has been wrongly drawn. Oxford University Press 2011-04 2009-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3063953/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkp052 Text en © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Social History of Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Horden, Peregrine
What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine?
title What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine?
title_full What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine?
title_fullStr What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine?
title_full_unstemmed What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine?
title_short What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine?
title_sort what's wrong with early medieval medicine?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3063953/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkp052
work_keys_str_mv AT hordenperegrine whatswrongwithearlymedievalmedicine