Cargando…

Cost effectiveness and cost utility of the noncoding blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS

AIMS: This study assessed the cost efficacy and cost utility of the automatic blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS from the public payer (National Health Fund [NHF]) and payer (patient and NHF) perspectives over a 26-year analysis horizon. METHODS: Clinical effectiveness data were obtained from prior c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holko, Przemyslaw, Kawalec, Pawal
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3064416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448325
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S9395
_version_ 1782200889352650752
author Holko, Przemyslaw
Kawalec, Pawal
author_facet Holko, Przemyslaw
Kawalec, Pawal
author_sort Holko, Przemyslaw
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study assessed the cost efficacy and cost utility of the automatic blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS from the public payer (National Health Fund [NHF]) and payer (patient and NHF) perspectives over a 26-year analysis horizon. METHODS: Clinical effectiveness data were obtained from prior clinical studies of automatic versus manually coded blood glucose meters. Cost data were obtained from the NHF. The probability of procedure use related to diabetic complications was obtained from four medical centers in Poland. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio related to 1 life year gained and the incremental cost-utility ratio related to 1 quality-adjusted life year gained were calculated. RESULTS: Assuming co-funding from public funds, introduction of the CONTOUR(®) TS is associated with savings of Polish zloty (PLN) 31,846.19 (€ 8916.93) and PLN 113,018.19 (€ 31,645.09) per life year gained from the payer and public payer perspectives, respectively. Cost utility analyses showed that the CONTOUR(®) TS is associated with savings of PLN 40,465.59 (€ 11,330.37) and PLN 11,434.82 (€ 3201.75) per quality-adjusted life year gained from the payer and the public payer perspectives, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CONTOUR(®) TS appears superior to manually coded meters available in Poland both from the payer and the public payer perspectives and may represent an improved strategy for glycemic control.
format Text
id pubmed-3064416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30644162011-03-29 Cost effectiveness and cost utility of the noncoding blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS Holko, Przemyslaw Kawalec, Pawal Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research AIMS: This study assessed the cost efficacy and cost utility of the automatic blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS from the public payer (National Health Fund [NHF]) and payer (patient and NHF) perspectives over a 26-year analysis horizon. METHODS: Clinical effectiveness data were obtained from prior clinical studies of automatic versus manually coded blood glucose meters. Cost data were obtained from the NHF. The probability of procedure use related to diabetic complications was obtained from four medical centers in Poland. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio related to 1 life year gained and the incremental cost-utility ratio related to 1 quality-adjusted life year gained were calculated. RESULTS: Assuming co-funding from public funds, introduction of the CONTOUR(®) TS is associated with savings of Polish zloty (PLN) 31,846.19 (€ 8916.93) and PLN 113,018.19 (€ 31,645.09) per life year gained from the payer and public payer perspectives, respectively. Cost utility analyses showed that the CONTOUR(®) TS is associated with savings of PLN 40,465.59 (€ 11,330.37) and PLN 11,434.82 (€ 3201.75) per quality-adjusted life year gained from the payer and the public payer perspectives, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CONTOUR(®) TS appears superior to manually coded meters available in Poland both from the payer and the public payer perspectives and may represent an improved strategy for glycemic control. Dove Medical Press 2011-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3064416/ /pubmed/21448325 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S9395 Text en © 2011 Holko and Kawalec, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Holko, Przemyslaw
Kawalec, Pawal
Cost effectiveness and cost utility of the noncoding blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS
title Cost effectiveness and cost utility of the noncoding blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS
title_full Cost effectiveness and cost utility of the noncoding blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS
title_fullStr Cost effectiveness and cost utility of the noncoding blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS
title_full_unstemmed Cost effectiveness and cost utility of the noncoding blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS
title_short Cost effectiveness and cost utility of the noncoding blood glucose meter CONTOUR(®) TS
title_sort cost effectiveness and cost utility of the noncoding blood glucose meter contour(®) ts
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3064416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448325
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S9395
work_keys_str_mv AT holkoprzemyslaw costeffectivenessandcostutilityofthenoncodingbloodglucosemetercontourts
AT kawalecpawal costeffectivenessandcostutilityofthenoncodingbloodglucosemetercontourts