Cargando…

Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae

BACKGROUND: Previous DNA-based phylogenetic studies of the Delphinidae family suggest it has undergone rapid diversification, as characterised by unresolved and poorly supported taxonomic relationships (polytomies) for some of the species within this group. Using an increased amount of sequence data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vilstrup, Julia T, Ho, Simon YW, Foote, Andrew D, Morin, Phillip A, Kreb, Danielle, Krützen, Michael, Parra, Guido J, Robertson, Kelly M, de Stephanis, Renaud, Verborgh, Philippe, Willerslev, Eske, Orlando, Ludovic, Gilbert, M Thomas P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3065423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21392378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-65
_version_ 1782200978486853632
author Vilstrup, Julia T
Ho, Simon YW
Foote, Andrew D
Morin, Phillip A
Kreb, Danielle
Krützen, Michael
Parra, Guido J
Robertson, Kelly M
de Stephanis, Renaud
Verborgh, Philippe
Willerslev, Eske
Orlando, Ludovic
Gilbert, M Thomas P
author_facet Vilstrup, Julia T
Ho, Simon YW
Foote, Andrew D
Morin, Phillip A
Kreb, Danielle
Krützen, Michael
Parra, Guido J
Robertson, Kelly M
de Stephanis, Renaud
Verborgh, Philippe
Willerslev, Eske
Orlando, Ludovic
Gilbert, M Thomas P
author_sort Vilstrup, Julia T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous DNA-based phylogenetic studies of the Delphinidae family suggest it has undergone rapid diversification, as characterised by unresolved and poorly supported taxonomic relationships (polytomies) for some of the species within this group. Using an increased amount of sequence data we test between alternative hypotheses of soft polytomies caused by rapid speciation, slow evolutionary rate and/or insufficient sequence data, and hard polytomies caused by simultaneous speciation within this family. Combining the mitogenome sequences of five new and 12 previously published species within the Delphinidae, we used Bayesian and maximum-likelihood methods to estimate the phylogeny from partitioned and unpartitioned mitogenome sequences. Further ad hoc tests were then conducted to estimate the support for alternative topologies. RESULTS: We found high support for all the relationships within our reconstructed phylogenies, and topologies were consistent between the Bayesian and maximum-likelihood trees inferred from partitioned and unpartitioned data. Resolved relationships included the placement of the killer whale (Orcinus orca) as sister taxon to the rest of the Globicephalinae subfamily, placement of the Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus) within the Globicephalinae subfamily, removal of the white-beaked dolphin (Lagenorhynchus albirostris) from the Delphininae subfamily and the placement of the rough-toothed dolphin (Steno bredanensis) as sister taxon to the rest of the Delphininae subfamily rather than within the Globicephalinae subfamily. The additional testing of alternative topologies allowed us to reject all other putative relationships, with the exception that we were unable to reject the hypothesis that the relationship between L. albirostris and the Globicephalinae and Delphininae subfamilies was polytomic. CONCLUSION: Despite their rapid diversification, the increased sequence data yielded by mitogenomes enables the resolution of a strongly supported, bifurcating phylogeny, and a chronology of the divergences within the Delphinidae family. This highlights the benefits and potential application of large mitogenome datasets to resolve long-standing phylogenetic uncertainties.
format Text
id pubmed-3065423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30654232011-03-29 Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae Vilstrup, Julia T Ho, Simon YW Foote, Andrew D Morin, Phillip A Kreb, Danielle Krützen, Michael Parra, Guido J Robertson, Kelly M de Stephanis, Renaud Verborgh, Philippe Willerslev, Eske Orlando, Ludovic Gilbert, M Thomas P BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous DNA-based phylogenetic studies of the Delphinidae family suggest it has undergone rapid diversification, as characterised by unresolved and poorly supported taxonomic relationships (polytomies) for some of the species within this group. Using an increased amount of sequence data we test between alternative hypotheses of soft polytomies caused by rapid speciation, slow evolutionary rate and/or insufficient sequence data, and hard polytomies caused by simultaneous speciation within this family. Combining the mitogenome sequences of five new and 12 previously published species within the Delphinidae, we used Bayesian and maximum-likelihood methods to estimate the phylogeny from partitioned and unpartitioned mitogenome sequences. Further ad hoc tests were then conducted to estimate the support for alternative topologies. RESULTS: We found high support for all the relationships within our reconstructed phylogenies, and topologies were consistent between the Bayesian and maximum-likelihood trees inferred from partitioned and unpartitioned data. Resolved relationships included the placement of the killer whale (Orcinus orca) as sister taxon to the rest of the Globicephalinae subfamily, placement of the Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus) within the Globicephalinae subfamily, removal of the white-beaked dolphin (Lagenorhynchus albirostris) from the Delphininae subfamily and the placement of the rough-toothed dolphin (Steno bredanensis) as sister taxon to the rest of the Delphininae subfamily rather than within the Globicephalinae subfamily. The additional testing of alternative topologies allowed us to reject all other putative relationships, with the exception that we were unable to reject the hypothesis that the relationship between L. albirostris and the Globicephalinae and Delphininae subfamilies was polytomic. CONCLUSION: Despite their rapid diversification, the increased sequence data yielded by mitogenomes enables the resolution of a strongly supported, bifurcating phylogeny, and a chronology of the divergences within the Delphinidae family. This highlights the benefits and potential application of large mitogenome datasets to resolve long-standing phylogenetic uncertainties. BioMed Central 2011-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3065423/ /pubmed/21392378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-65 Text en Copyright ©2011 Vilstrup et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vilstrup, Julia T
Ho, Simon YW
Foote, Andrew D
Morin, Phillip A
Kreb, Danielle
Krützen, Michael
Parra, Guido J
Robertson, Kelly M
de Stephanis, Renaud
Verborgh, Philippe
Willerslev, Eske
Orlando, Ludovic
Gilbert, M Thomas P
Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae
title Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae
title_full Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae
title_fullStr Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae
title_full_unstemmed Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae
title_short Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae
title_sort mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the delphinidae with an emphasis on the globicephalinae
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3065423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21392378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-65
work_keys_str_mv AT vilstrupjuliat mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT hosimonyw mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT footeandrewd mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT morinphillipa mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT krebdanielle mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT krutzenmichael mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT parraguidoj mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT robertsonkellym mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT destephanisrenaud mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT verborghphilippe mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT willersleveske mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT orlandoludovic mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae
AT gilbertmthomasp mitogenomicphylogeneticanalysesofthedelphinidaewithanemphasisontheglobicephalinae