Cargando…

Clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the PreSCD II Registry(†)

AIMS: Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with the reduced left ventricular function (LVEF ≤30%) not earlier than 40 days after myocardial infarction (MI). The aim of the prospective Prevention o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Völler, Heinz, Kamke, Wolfram, Klein, Helmut U., Block, Michael, Reibis, Rona, Treusch, Sven, Contzen, Klaus, Wegscheider, Karl
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3065916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21123220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq426
_version_ 1782201038668824576
author Völler, Heinz
Kamke, Wolfram
Klein, Helmut U.
Block, Michael
Reibis, Rona
Treusch, Sven
Contzen, Klaus
Wegscheider, Karl
author_facet Völler, Heinz
Kamke, Wolfram
Klein, Helmut U.
Block, Michael
Reibis, Rona
Treusch, Sven
Contzen, Klaus
Wegscheider, Karl
author_sort Völler, Heinz
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with the reduced left ventricular function (LVEF ≤30%) not earlier than 40 days after myocardial infarction (MI). The aim of the prospective Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death II (PreSCD II) registry was to investigate the clinical practice of ICD therapy in post-MI patients and to assess the impact on survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: 10 612 consecutive patients (61 ± 12 years, 76% male) were enrolled 4 weeks or later after MI in 19 cardiac rehabilitation centres in Germany from December 2002 to May 2005. All patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% (n = 952) together with a randomly selected group of patients with preserved left ventricular function (n = 1106) were followed for 36 months. Cox proportional hazard models were used to correlate ICD implantation and survival with baseline characteristics. Of all patients studied, 75.9% were enrolled within 4–8 weeks, 10.7% more than 1 year after MI. Pre-specified Group 1 with an LVEF ≤30% consisted of 269 patients (2.5%), Group 2 with LVEF 31–40% of 727 patients (6.9%), and Group 3 with LVEF >40% of 1148 randomly selected patients from the cohort of 9616 patients with preserved LV function. After 36 months, only 142 patients (6.9%) had received an ICD; 82 (31.7%) of Group 1, 49 (7%) of Group 2, and 11 (1%) in Group 3. The ICD was implanted in 47% of all patients within 1 year after their index MI. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients were predominantly characterized by low ejection fraction, but also by several other independent risk factors. Patients who received an ICD had an adjusted 44% lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence intervals 0.32–1.01; P = 0.053) than comparable patients without ICD therapy. All cause mortality of ICD recipients was significantly lower if the ICD was implanted later than 11 months after acute MI (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PreSCD II registry demonstrated that the number of patients who develop a low LVEF (≤30%) after acute MI is small. However, only few patients with guideline-based ICD indication received ICD therapy. All cause mortality was significantly reduced only if the ICD was implanted late (>11 months) after MI.
format Text
id pubmed-3065916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30659162011-03-30 Clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the PreSCD II Registry(†) Völler, Heinz Kamke, Wolfram Klein, Helmut U. Block, Michael Reibis, Rona Treusch, Sven Contzen, Klaus Wegscheider, Karl Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with the reduced left ventricular function (LVEF ≤30%) not earlier than 40 days after myocardial infarction (MI). The aim of the prospective Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death II (PreSCD II) registry was to investigate the clinical practice of ICD therapy in post-MI patients and to assess the impact on survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: 10 612 consecutive patients (61 ± 12 years, 76% male) were enrolled 4 weeks or later after MI in 19 cardiac rehabilitation centres in Germany from December 2002 to May 2005. All patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% (n = 952) together with a randomly selected group of patients with preserved left ventricular function (n = 1106) were followed for 36 months. Cox proportional hazard models were used to correlate ICD implantation and survival with baseline characteristics. Of all patients studied, 75.9% were enrolled within 4–8 weeks, 10.7% more than 1 year after MI. Pre-specified Group 1 with an LVEF ≤30% consisted of 269 patients (2.5%), Group 2 with LVEF 31–40% of 727 patients (6.9%), and Group 3 with LVEF >40% of 1148 randomly selected patients from the cohort of 9616 patients with preserved LV function. After 36 months, only 142 patients (6.9%) had received an ICD; 82 (31.7%) of Group 1, 49 (7%) of Group 2, and 11 (1%) in Group 3. The ICD was implanted in 47% of all patients within 1 year after their index MI. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients were predominantly characterized by low ejection fraction, but also by several other independent risk factors. Patients who received an ICD had an adjusted 44% lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence intervals 0.32–1.01; P = 0.053) than comparable patients without ICD therapy. All cause mortality of ICD recipients was significantly lower if the ICD was implanted later than 11 months after acute MI (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PreSCD II registry demonstrated that the number of patients who develop a low LVEF (≤30%) after acute MI is small. However, only few patients with guideline-based ICD indication received ICD therapy. All cause mortality was significantly reduced only if the ICD was implanted late (>11 months) after MI. Oxford University Press 2011-04 2010-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3065916/ /pubmed/21123220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq426 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2010. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Völler, Heinz
Kamke, Wolfram
Klein, Helmut U.
Block, Michael
Reibis, Rona
Treusch, Sven
Contzen, Klaus
Wegscheider, Karl
Clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the PreSCD II Registry(†)
title Clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the PreSCD II Registry(†)
title_full Clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the PreSCD II Registry(†)
title_fullStr Clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the PreSCD II Registry(†)
title_full_unstemmed Clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the PreSCD II Registry(†)
title_short Clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the PreSCD II Registry(†)
title_sort clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the prescd ii registry(†)
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3065916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21123220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq426
work_keys_str_mv AT vollerheinz clinicalpracticeofdefibrillatorimplantationaftermyocardialinfarctionimpactofimplanttimeresultsfromtheprescdiiregistry
AT kamkewolfram clinicalpracticeofdefibrillatorimplantationaftermyocardialinfarctionimpactofimplanttimeresultsfromtheprescdiiregistry
AT kleinhelmutu clinicalpracticeofdefibrillatorimplantationaftermyocardialinfarctionimpactofimplanttimeresultsfromtheprescdiiregistry
AT blockmichael clinicalpracticeofdefibrillatorimplantationaftermyocardialinfarctionimpactofimplanttimeresultsfromtheprescdiiregistry
AT reibisrona clinicalpracticeofdefibrillatorimplantationaftermyocardialinfarctionimpactofimplanttimeresultsfromtheprescdiiregistry
AT treuschsven clinicalpracticeofdefibrillatorimplantationaftermyocardialinfarctionimpactofimplanttimeresultsfromtheprescdiiregistry
AT contzenklaus clinicalpracticeofdefibrillatorimplantationaftermyocardialinfarctionimpactofimplanttimeresultsfromtheprescdiiregistry
AT wegscheiderkarl clinicalpracticeofdefibrillatorimplantationaftermyocardialinfarctionimpactofimplanttimeresultsfromtheprescdiiregistry