Cargando…
Avicenna's concept of pain
Ibn Sina (Latin name – Avicenna, 980–1037) is a famous Muslim physician who wrote The Canon of Medicine. Pain-related writings within The Canon were identified and analysed and compared to Galen and Modern Pain Theory. We found evidence in The Canon that Avicenna challenged Galen's concept of p...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CoAction Publishing
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3066781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21483573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5253 |
_version_ | 1782201115356430336 |
---|---|
author | Tashani, Osama A. Johnson, Mark I. |
author_facet | Tashani, Osama A. Johnson, Mark I. |
author_sort | Tashani, Osama A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ibn Sina (Latin name – Avicenna, 980–1037) is a famous Muslim physician who wrote The Canon of Medicine. Pain-related writings within The Canon were identified and analysed and compared to Galen and Modern Pain Theory. We found evidence in The Canon that Avicenna challenged Galen's concept of pain. Galen insisted that injuries (breach of continuity) were the only cause of pain. In contrast, Avicenna suggested that the true cause of pain was a change of the physical condition (temperament change) of the organ whether there was an injury present or not. Avicenna extended Galen's descriptions of 4 to 15 types of pain and used a terminology that is remarkably similar to that used in the McGill Pain Questionnaire. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3066781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | CoAction Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30667812011-04-11 Avicenna's concept of pain Tashani, Osama A. Johnson, Mark I. Libyan J Med Special Article Ibn Sina (Latin name – Avicenna, 980–1037) is a famous Muslim physician who wrote The Canon of Medicine. Pain-related writings within The Canon were identified and analysed and compared to Galen and Modern Pain Theory. We found evidence in The Canon that Avicenna challenged Galen's concept of pain. Galen insisted that injuries (breach of continuity) were the only cause of pain. In contrast, Avicenna suggested that the true cause of pain was a change of the physical condition (temperament change) of the organ whether there was an injury present or not. Avicenna extended Galen's descriptions of 4 to 15 types of pain and used a terminology that is remarkably similar to that used in the McGill Pain Questionnaire. CoAction Publishing 2010-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3066781/ /pubmed/21483573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5253 Text en © 2010 Osama A. Tashani and Mark I. Johnson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Article Tashani, Osama A. Johnson, Mark I. Avicenna's concept of pain |
title | Avicenna's concept of pain |
title_full | Avicenna's concept of pain |
title_fullStr | Avicenna's concept of pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Avicenna's concept of pain |
title_short | Avicenna's concept of pain |
title_sort | avicenna's concept of pain |
topic | Special Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3066781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21483573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tashaniosamaa avicennasconceptofpain AT johnsonmarki avicennasconceptofpain |