Cargando…

Avicenna's concept of pain

Ibn Sina (Latin name – Avicenna, 980–1037) is a famous Muslim physician who wrote The Canon of Medicine. Pain-related writings within The Canon were identified and analysed and compared to Galen and Modern Pain Theory. We found evidence in The Canon that Avicenna challenged Galen's concept of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tashani, Osama A., Johnson, Mark I.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CoAction Publishing 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3066781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21483573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5253
_version_ 1782201115356430336
author Tashani, Osama A.
Johnson, Mark I.
author_facet Tashani, Osama A.
Johnson, Mark I.
author_sort Tashani, Osama A.
collection PubMed
description Ibn Sina (Latin name – Avicenna, 980–1037) is a famous Muslim physician who wrote The Canon of Medicine. Pain-related writings within The Canon were identified and analysed and compared to Galen and Modern Pain Theory. We found evidence in The Canon that Avicenna challenged Galen's concept of pain. Galen insisted that injuries (breach of continuity) were the only cause of pain. In contrast, Avicenna suggested that the true cause of pain was a change of the physical condition (temperament change) of the organ whether there was an injury present or not. Avicenna extended Galen's descriptions of 4 to 15 types of pain and used a terminology that is remarkably similar to that used in the McGill Pain Questionnaire.
format Text
id pubmed-3066781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher CoAction Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30667812011-04-11 Avicenna's concept of pain Tashani, Osama A. Johnson, Mark I. Libyan J Med Special Article Ibn Sina (Latin name – Avicenna, 980–1037) is a famous Muslim physician who wrote The Canon of Medicine. Pain-related writings within The Canon were identified and analysed and compared to Galen and Modern Pain Theory. We found evidence in The Canon that Avicenna challenged Galen's concept of pain. Galen insisted that injuries (breach of continuity) were the only cause of pain. In contrast, Avicenna suggested that the true cause of pain was a change of the physical condition (temperament change) of the organ whether there was an injury present or not. Avicenna extended Galen's descriptions of 4 to 15 types of pain and used a terminology that is remarkably similar to that used in the McGill Pain Questionnaire. CoAction Publishing 2010-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3066781/ /pubmed/21483573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5253 Text en © 2010 Osama A. Tashani and Mark I. Johnson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Article
Tashani, Osama A.
Johnson, Mark I.
Avicenna's concept of pain
title Avicenna's concept of pain
title_full Avicenna's concept of pain
title_fullStr Avicenna's concept of pain
title_full_unstemmed Avicenna's concept of pain
title_short Avicenna's concept of pain
title_sort avicenna's concept of pain
topic Special Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3066781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21483573
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5253
work_keys_str_mv AT tashaniosamaa avicennasconceptofpain
AT johnsonmarki avicennasconceptofpain