Cargando…

Intraspecific Body Size Frequency Distributions of Insects

Although interspecific body size frequency distributions are well documented for many taxa, including the insects, intraspecific body size frequency distributions (IaBSFDs) are more poorly known, and their variation among mass-based and linear estimates of size has not been widely explored. Here we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gouws, E. Jeanne, Gaston, Kevin J., Chown, Steven L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21479214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016606
_version_ 1782201194122313728
author Gouws, E. Jeanne
Gaston, Kevin J.
Chown, Steven L.
author_facet Gouws, E. Jeanne
Gaston, Kevin J.
Chown, Steven L.
author_sort Gouws, E. Jeanne
collection PubMed
description Although interspecific body size frequency distributions are well documented for many taxa, including the insects, intraspecific body size frequency distributions (IaBSFDs) are more poorly known, and their variation among mass-based and linear estimates of size has not been widely explored. Here we provide IaBSFDs for 16 species of insects based on both mass and linear estimates and large sample sizes (n≥100). In addition, we review the published IaBSFDs for insects, though doing so is complicated by their under-emphasis in the literature. The form of IaBSFDs can differ substantially between mass-based and linear measures. Nonetheless, in non-social insects they tend to be normally distributed (18 of 27 species) or in fewer instances positively skewed. Negatively skewed distributions are infrequently reported and log transformation readily removes the positive skew. Sexual size dimorphism does not generally cause bimodality in IaBSFDs. The available information on IaBSFDs in the social insects suggests that these distributions are usually positively skewed or bimodal (24 of 30 species). However, only c. 15% of ant genera are polymorphic, suggesting that normal distributions are probably more common, but less frequently investigated. Although only 57 species, representing seven of the 29 orders of insects, have been considered here, it appears that whilst IaBSFDs are usually normal, other distribution shapes can be found in several species, though most notably among the social insects. By contrast, the interspecific body size frequency distribution is typically right-skewed in insects and in most other taxa.
format Text
id pubmed-3068144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30681442011-04-08 Intraspecific Body Size Frequency Distributions of Insects Gouws, E. Jeanne Gaston, Kevin J. Chown, Steven L. PLoS One Research Article Although interspecific body size frequency distributions are well documented for many taxa, including the insects, intraspecific body size frequency distributions (IaBSFDs) are more poorly known, and their variation among mass-based and linear estimates of size has not been widely explored. Here we provide IaBSFDs for 16 species of insects based on both mass and linear estimates and large sample sizes (n≥100). In addition, we review the published IaBSFDs for insects, though doing so is complicated by their under-emphasis in the literature. The form of IaBSFDs can differ substantially between mass-based and linear measures. Nonetheless, in non-social insects they tend to be normally distributed (18 of 27 species) or in fewer instances positively skewed. Negatively skewed distributions are infrequently reported and log transformation readily removes the positive skew. Sexual size dimorphism does not generally cause bimodality in IaBSFDs. The available information on IaBSFDs in the social insects suggests that these distributions are usually positively skewed or bimodal (24 of 30 species). However, only c. 15% of ant genera are polymorphic, suggesting that normal distributions are probably more common, but less frequently investigated. Although only 57 species, representing seven of the 29 orders of insects, have been considered here, it appears that whilst IaBSFDs are usually normal, other distribution shapes can be found in several species, though most notably among the social insects. By contrast, the interspecific body size frequency distribution is typically right-skewed in insects and in most other taxa. Public Library of Science 2011-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3068144/ /pubmed/21479214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016606 Text en Gouws et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gouws, E. Jeanne
Gaston, Kevin J.
Chown, Steven L.
Intraspecific Body Size Frequency Distributions of Insects
title Intraspecific Body Size Frequency Distributions of Insects
title_full Intraspecific Body Size Frequency Distributions of Insects
title_fullStr Intraspecific Body Size Frequency Distributions of Insects
title_full_unstemmed Intraspecific Body Size Frequency Distributions of Insects
title_short Intraspecific Body Size Frequency Distributions of Insects
title_sort intraspecific body size frequency distributions of insects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21479214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016606
work_keys_str_mv AT gouwsejeanne intraspecificbodysizefrequencydistributionsofinsects
AT gastonkevinj intraspecificbodysizefrequencydistributionsofinsects
AT chownstevenl intraspecificbodysizefrequencydistributionsofinsects