Cargando…
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies
Propensity score methods are increasingly being used to estimate the effects of treatments on health outcomes using observational data. There are four methods for using the propensity score to estimate treatment effects: covariate adjustment using the propensity score, stratification on the propensi...
Autor principal: | Austin, Peter C |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20108233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.3854 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies
por: Austin, Peter C
Publicado: (2011) -
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating absolute effects of treatments on survival outcomes: A simulation study
por: Austin, Peter C, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios
por: Austin, Peter C
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples
por: Austin, Peter C
Publicado: (2011) -
Performance of models for estimating absolute risk difference in multicenter trials with binary outcome
por: Pedroza, Claudia, et al.
Publicado: (2016)