Cargando…

Use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups

Optical maps were generated for 33 uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) isolates. For individual genomes, the NcoI restriction fragments aligned into a unique chromosome map for each individual isolate, which was then compared with the in silico restriction maps of all of the sequenced E. coli and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwan, William R., Briska, Adam, Stahl, Buffy, Wagner, Trevor K., Zentz, Emily, Henkhaus, John, Lovrich, Steven D., Agger, William A., Callister, Steven M., DuChateau, Brian, Dykes, Colin W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Microbiology Society 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20378655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.033977-0
_version_ 1782201272652267520
author Schwan, William R.
Briska, Adam
Stahl, Buffy
Wagner, Trevor K.
Zentz, Emily
Henkhaus, John
Lovrich, Steven D.
Agger, William A.
Callister, Steven M.
DuChateau, Brian
Dykes, Colin W.
author_facet Schwan, William R.
Briska, Adam
Stahl, Buffy
Wagner, Trevor K.
Zentz, Emily
Henkhaus, John
Lovrich, Steven D.
Agger, William A.
Callister, Steven M.
DuChateau, Brian
Dykes, Colin W.
author_sort Schwan, William R.
collection PubMed
description Optical maps were generated for 33 uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) isolates. For individual genomes, the NcoI restriction fragments aligned into a unique chromosome map for each individual isolate, which was then compared with the in silico restriction maps of all of the sequenced E. coli and Shigella strains. All of the UPEC isolates clustered separately from the Shigella strains as well as the laboratory and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli strains. Moreover, the individual strains appeared to cluster into distinct subgroups based on the dendrogram analyses. Phylogenetic grouping of these 33 strains showed that 32/33 were the B2 subgroup and 1/33 was subgroup A. To further characterize the similarities and differences among the 33 isolates, pathogenicity island (PAI), haemolysin and virulence gene comparisons were performed. A strong correlation was observed between individual subgroups and virulence factor genes as well as haemolysis activity. Furthermore, there was considerable conservation of sequenced-strain PAIs in the specific subgroups. Strains with different antibiotic-resistance patterns also appeared to sort into separate subgroups. Thus, the optical maps distinguished the UPEC strains from other E. coli strains and further subdivided the strains into distinct subgroups. This optical mapping procedure holds promise as an alternative way to subgroup all E. coli strains, including those involved in infections outside of the intestinal tract and epidemic strains with distinct patterns of antibiotic resistance.
format Text
id pubmed-3068680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Microbiology Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30686802011-07-01 Use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups Schwan, William R. Briska, Adam Stahl, Buffy Wagner, Trevor K. Zentz, Emily Henkhaus, John Lovrich, Steven D. Agger, William A. Callister, Steven M. DuChateau, Brian Dykes, Colin W. Microbiology (Reading) Genes and Genomes Optical maps were generated for 33 uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) isolates. For individual genomes, the NcoI restriction fragments aligned into a unique chromosome map for each individual isolate, which was then compared with the in silico restriction maps of all of the sequenced E. coli and Shigella strains. All of the UPEC isolates clustered separately from the Shigella strains as well as the laboratory and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli strains. Moreover, the individual strains appeared to cluster into distinct subgroups based on the dendrogram analyses. Phylogenetic grouping of these 33 strains showed that 32/33 were the B2 subgroup and 1/33 was subgroup A. To further characterize the similarities and differences among the 33 isolates, pathogenicity island (PAI), haemolysin and virulence gene comparisons were performed. A strong correlation was observed between individual subgroups and virulence factor genes as well as haemolysis activity. Furthermore, there was considerable conservation of sequenced-strain PAIs in the specific subgroups. Strains with different antibiotic-resistance patterns also appeared to sort into separate subgroups. Thus, the optical maps distinguished the UPEC strains from other E. coli strains and further subdivided the strains into distinct subgroups. This optical mapping procedure holds promise as an alternative way to subgroup all E. coli strains, including those involved in infections outside of the intestinal tract and epidemic strains with distinct patterns of antibiotic resistance. Microbiology Society 2010-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3068680/ /pubmed/20378655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.033977-0 Text en Copyright © 2010, SGM
spellingShingle Genes and Genomes
Schwan, William R.
Briska, Adam
Stahl, Buffy
Wagner, Trevor K.
Zentz, Emily
Henkhaus, John
Lovrich, Steven D.
Agger, William A.
Callister, Steven M.
DuChateau, Brian
Dykes, Colin W.
Use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups
title Use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups
title_full Use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups
title_fullStr Use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups
title_full_unstemmed Use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups
title_short Use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups
title_sort use of optical mapping to sort uropathogenic escherichia coli strains into distinct subgroups
topic Genes and Genomes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20378655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.033977-0
work_keys_str_mv AT schwanwilliamr useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT briskaadam useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT stahlbuffy useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT wagnertrevork useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT zentzemily useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT henkhausjohn useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT lovrichstevend useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT aggerwilliama useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT callisterstevenm useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT duchateaubrian useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups
AT dykescolinw useofopticalmappingtosorturopathogenicescherichiacolistrainsintodistinctsubgroups