Cargando…

Introgression potential between safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus Carthamus

BACKGROUND: Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius, is a thistle that is grown commercially for the production of oil and birdseed and recently, as a host for the production of transgenic pharmaceutical proteins. C. tinctorius can cross with a number of its wild relatives, creating the possibility of gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayerhofer, Marion, Mayerhofer, Reinhold, Topinka, Deborah, Christianson, Jed, Good, Allen G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21401959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-47
_version_ 1782201288140783616
author Mayerhofer, Marion
Mayerhofer, Reinhold
Topinka, Deborah
Christianson, Jed
Good, Allen G
author_facet Mayerhofer, Marion
Mayerhofer, Reinhold
Topinka, Deborah
Christianson, Jed
Good, Allen G
author_sort Mayerhofer, Marion
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius, is a thistle that is grown commercially for the production of oil and birdseed and recently, as a host for the production of transgenic pharmaceutical proteins. C. tinctorius can cross with a number of its wild relatives, creating the possibility of gene flow from safflower to weedy species. In this study we looked at the introgression potential between different members of the genus Carthamus, measured the fitness of the parents versus the F1 hybrids, followed the segregation of a specific transgene in the progeny and tried to identify traits important for adaptation to different environments. RESULTS: Safflower hybridized and produced viable offspring with members of the section Carthamus and species with chromosome numbers of n = 10 and n = 22, but not with n = 32. The T-DNA construct of a transgenic C. tinctorius line was passed on to the F1 progeny in a Mendelian fashion, except in one specific cross, where it was deleted at a frequency of approximately 21%. Analyzing fitness and key morphological traits like colored seeds, shattering seed heads and the presence of a pappus, we found no evidence of hybrid vigour or increased weediness in the F1 hybrids of commercial safflower and its wild relatives. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that hybridization between commercial safflower and its wild relatives, while feasible in most cases we studied, does not generate progeny with higher propensity for weediness.
format Text
id pubmed-3068944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30689442011-04-01 Introgression potential between safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus Carthamus Mayerhofer, Marion Mayerhofer, Reinhold Topinka, Deborah Christianson, Jed Good, Allen G BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Safflower, Carthamus tinctorius, is a thistle that is grown commercially for the production of oil and birdseed and recently, as a host for the production of transgenic pharmaceutical proteins. C. tinctorius can cross with a number of its wild relatives, creating the possibility of gene flow from safflower to weedy species. In this study we looked at the introgression potential between different members of the genus Carthamus, measured the fitness of the parents versus the F1 hybrids, followed the segregation of a specific transgene in the progeny and tried to identify traits important for adaptation to different environments. RESULTS: Safflower hybridized and produced viable offspring with members of the section Carthamus and species with chromosome numbers of n = 10 and n = 22, but not with n = 32. The T-DNA construct of a transgenic C. tinctorius line was passed on to the F1 progeny in a Mendelian fashion, except in one specific cross, where it was deleted at a frequency of approximately 21%. Analyzing fitness and key morphological traits like colored seeds, shattering seed heads and the presence of a pappus, we found no evidence of hybrid vigour or increased weediness in the F1 hybrids of commercial safflower and its wild relatives. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that hybridization between commercial safflower and its wild relatives, while feasible in most cases we studied, does not generate progeny with higher propensity for weediness. BioMed Central 2011-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3068944/ /pubmed/21401959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-47 Text en Copyright ©2011 Mayerhofer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mayerhofer, Marion
Mayerhofer, Reinhold
Topinka, Deborah
Christianson, Jed
Good, Allen G
Introgression potential between safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus Carthamus
title Introgression potential between safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus Carthamus
title_full Introgression potential between safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus Carthamus
title_fullStr Introgression potential between safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus Carthamus
title_full_unstemmed Introgression potential between safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus Carthamus
title_short Introgression potential between safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus Carthamus
title_sort introgression potential between safflower (carthamus tinctorius) and wild relatives of the genus carthamus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21401959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-47
work_keys_str_mv AT mayerhofermarion introgressionpotentialbetweensafflowercarthamustinctoriusandwildrelativesofthegenuscarthamus
AT mayerhoferreinhold introgressionpotentialbetweensafflowercarthamustinctoriusandwildrelativesofthegenuscarthamus
AT topinkadeborah introgressionpotentialbetweensafflowercarthamustinctoriusandwildrelativesofthegenuscarthamus
AT christiansonjed introgressionpotentialbetweensafflowercarthamustinctoriusandwildrelativesofthegenuscarthamus
AT goodalleng introgressionpotentialbetweensafflowercarthamustinctoriusandwildrelativesofthegenuscarthamus