Cargando…

Nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA: evidence for hybridization in colobine monkeys

BACKGROUND: Colobine monkeys constitute a diverse group of primates with major radiations in Africa and Asia. However, phylogenetic relationships among genera are under debate, and recent molecular studies with incomplete taxon-sampling revealed discordant gene trees. To solve the evolutionary histo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roos, Christian, Zinner, Dietmar, Kubatko, Laura S, Schwarz, Christiane, Yang, Mouyu, Meyer, Dirk, Nash, Stephen D, Xing, Jinchuan, Batzer, Mark A, Brameier, Markus, Leendertz, Fabian H, Ziegler, Thomas, Perwitasari-Farajallah, Dyah, Nadler, Tilo, Walter, Lutz, Osterholz, Martin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21435245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-77
_version_ 1782201293577650176
author Roos, Christian
Zinner, Dietmar
Kubatko, Laura S
Schwarz, Christiane
Yang, Mouyu
Meyer, Dirk
Nash, Stephen D
Xing, Jinchuan
Batzer, Mark A
Brameier, Markus
Leendertz, Fabian H
Ziegler, Thomas
Perwitasari-Farajallah, Dyah
Nadler, Tilo
Walter, Lutz
Osterholz, Martin
author_facet Roos, Christian
Zinner, Dietmar
Kubatko, Laura S
Schwarz, Christiane
Yang, Mouyu
Meyer, Dirk
Nash, Stephen D
Xing, Jinchuan
Batzer, Mark A
Brameier, Markus
Leendertz, Fabian H
Ziegler, Thomas
Perwitasari-Farajallah, Dyah
Nadler, Tilo
Walter, Lutz
Osterholz, Martin
author_sort Roos, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colobine monkeys constitute a diverse group of primates with major radiations in Africa and Asia. However, phylogenetic relationships among genera are under debate, and recent molecular studies with incomplete taxon-sampling revealed discordant gene trees. To solve the evolutionary history of colobine genera and to determine causes for possible gene tree incongruences, we combined presence/absence analysis of mobile elements with autosomal, X chromosomal, Y chromosomal and mitochondrial sequence data from all recognized colobine genera. RESULTS: Gene tree topologies and divergence age estimates derived from different markers were similar, but differed in placing Piliocolobus/Procolobus and langur genera among colobines. Although insufficient data, homoplasy and incomplete lineage sorting might all have contributed to the discordance among gene trees, hybridization is favored as the main cause of the observed discordance. We propose that African colobines are paraphyletic, but might later have experienced female introgression from Piliocolobus/Procolobus into Colobus. In the late Miocene, colobines invaded Eurasia and diversified into several lineages. Among Asian colobines, Semnopithecus diverged first, indicating langur paraphyly. However, unidirectional gene flow from Semnopithecus into Trachypithecus via male introgression followed by nuclear swamping might have occurred until the earliest Pleistocene. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study provides the most comprehensive view on colobine evolution to date and emphasizes that analyses of various molecular markers, such as mobile elements and sequence data from multiple loci, are crucial to better understand evolutionary relationships and to trace hybridization events. Our results also suggest that sex-specific dispersal patterns, promoted by a respective social organization of the species involved, can result in different hybridization scenarios.
format Text
id pubmed-3068967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30689672011-04-01 Nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA: evidence for hybridization in colobine monkeys Roos, Christian Zinner, Dietmar Kubatko, Laura S Schwarz, Christiane Yang, Mouyu Meyer, Dirk Nash, Stephen D Xing, Jinchuan Batzer, Mark A Brameier, Markus Leendertz, Fabian H Ziegler, Thomas Perwitasari-Farajallah, Dyah Nadler, Tilo Walter, Lutz Osterholz, Martin BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Colobine monkeys constitute a diverse group of primates with major radiations in Africa and Asia. However, phylogenetic relationships among genera are under debate, and recent molecular studies with incomplete taxon-sampling revealed discordant gene trees. To solve the evolutionary history of colobine genera and to determine causes for possible gene tree incongruences, we combined presence/absence analysis of mobile elements with autosomal, X chromosomal, Y chromosomal and mitochondrial sequence data from all recognized colobine genera. RESULTS: Gene tree topologies and divergence age estimates derived from different markers were similar, but differed in placing Piliocolobus/Procolobus and langur genera among colobines. Although insufficient data, homoplasy and incomplete lineage sorting might all have contributed to the discordance among gene trees, hybridization is favored as the main cause of the observed discordance. We propose that African colobines are paraphyletic, but might later have experienced female introgression from Piliocolobus/Procolobus into Colobus. In the late Miocene, colobines invaded Eurasia and diversified into several lineages. Among Asian colobines, Semnopithecus diverged first, indicating langur paraphyly. However, unidirectional gene flow from Semnopithecus into Trachypithecus via male introgression followed by nuclear swamping might have occurred until the earliest Pleistocene. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study provides the most comprehensive view on colobine evolution to date and emphasizes that analyses of various molecular markers, such as mobile elements and sequence data from multiple loci, are crucial to better understand evolutionary relationships and to trace hybridization events. Our results also suggest that sex-specific dispersal patterns, promoted by a respective social organization of the species involved, can result in different hybridization scenarios. BioMed Central 2011-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3068967/ /pubmed/21435245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-77 Text en Copyright ©2011 Roos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roos, Christian
Zinner, Dietmar
Kubatko, Laura S
Schwarz, Christiane
Yang, Mouyu
Meyer, Dirk
Nash, Stephen D
Xing, Jinchuan
Batzer, Mark A
Brameier, Markus
Leendertz, Fabian H
Ziegler, Thomas
Perwitasari-Farajallah, Dyah
Nadler, Tilo
Walter, Lutz
Osterholz, Martin
Nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA: evidence for hybridization in colobine monkeys
title Nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA: evidence for hybridization in colobine monkeys
title_full Nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA: evidence for hybridization in colobine monkeys
title_fullStr Nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA: evidence for hybridization in colobine monkeys
title_full_unstemmed Nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA: evidence for hybridization in colobine monkeys
title_short Nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA: evidence for hybridization in colobine monkeys
title_sort nuclear versus mitochondrial dna: evidence for hybridization in colobine monkeys
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21435245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-77
work_keys_str_mv AT rooschristian nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT zinnerdietmar nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT kubatkolauras nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT schwarzchristiane nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT yangmouyu nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT meyerdirk nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT nashstephend nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT xingjinchuan nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT batzermarka nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT brameiermarkus nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT leendertzfabianh nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT zieglerthomas nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT perwitasarifarajallahdyah nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT nadlertilo nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT walterlutz nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys
AT osterholzmartin nuclearversusmitochondrialdnaevidenceforhybridizationincolobinemonkeys