Cargando…
Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses
BACKGROUND: Laser capture microdissection (LCM) can be applied to tissues where cells of interest are distinguishable from surrounding cell populations. Here, we have optimized LCM for fresh frozen normal breast tissue where large amounts of fat can cause problems during microdissection. Since the a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-69 |
_version_ | 1782201294428045312 |
---|---|
author | Aaltonen, Kristina E Ebbesson, Anna Wigerup, Caroline Hedenfalk, Ingrid |
author_facet | Aaltonen, Kristina E Ebbesson, Anna Wigerup, Caroline Hedenfalk, Ingrid |
author_sort | Aaltonen, Kristina E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laser capture microdissection (LCM) can be applied to tissues where cells of interest are distinguishable from surrounding cell populations. Here, we have optimized LCM for fresh frozen normal breast tissue where large amounts of fat can cause problems during microdissection. Since the amount of DNA needed for genome wide analyses, such as single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, is often greater than what can be obtained from the dissected tissue, we have compared three different whole genome amplification (WGA) kits for amplification of DNA from LCM material. In addition, the genome wide profiling methods commonly used today require extremely high DNA quality compared to PCR based techniques and DNA quality is thus critical for successful downstream analyses. FINDINGS: We found that by using FrameSlides without glass backing for LCM and treating the slides with acetone after staining, the problems caused by excessive fat could be significantly decreased. The amount of DNA obtained after extraction from LCM tissue was not sufficient for direct SNP array analysis in our material. However, the two WGA kits based on Phi29 polymerase technology (Repli-g(® )(Qiagen) and GenomiPhi (GE Healthcare)) gave relatively long amplification products, and amplified DNA from Repli-g(® )gave call rates in the subsequent SNP analysis close to those from non-amplified DNA. Furthermore, the quality of the input DNA for WGA was found to be essential for successful SNP array results and initial DNA fragmentation problems could be reduced by switching from a regular halogen lamp to a VIS-LED lamp during LCM. CONCLUSIONS: LCM must be optimized to work satisfactorily in difficult tissues. We describe a work flow for fresh frozen normal breast tissue where fat is inclined to cause problems if sample treatment is not adapted to this tissue. We also show that the Phi29-based Repli-g(® )WGA kit (Qiagen) is a feasible approach to amplify DNA of high quality prior to genome wide analyses such as SNP profiling. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3068970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30689702011-04-01 Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses Aaltonen, Kristina E Ebbesson, Anna Wigerup, Caroline Hedenfalk, Ingrid BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: Laser capture microdissection (LCM) can be applied to tissues where cells of interest are distinguishable from surrounding cell populations. Here, we have optimized LCM for fresh frozen normal breast tissue where large amounts of fat can cause problems during microdissection. Since the amount of DNA needed for genome wide analyses, such as single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, is often greater than what can be obtained from the dissected tissue, we have compared three different whole genome amplification (WGA) kits for amplification of DNA from LCM material. In addition, the genome wide profiling methods commonly used today require extremely high DNA quality compared to PCR based techniques and DNA quality is thus critical for successful downstream analyses. FINDINGS: We found that by using FrameSlides without glass backing for LCM and treating the slides with acetone after staining, the problems caused by excessive fat could be significantly decreased. The amount of DNA obtained after extraction from LCM tissue was not sufficient for direct SNP array analysis in our material. However, the two WGA kits based on Phi29 polymerase technology (Repli-g(® )(Qiagen) and GenomiPhi (GE Healthcare)) gave relatively long amplification products, and amplified DNA from Repli-g(® )gave call rates in the subsequent SNP analysis close to those from non-amplified DNA. Furthermore, the quality of the input DNA for WGA was found to be essential for successful SNP array results and initial DNA fragmentation problems could be reduced by switching from a regular halogen lamp to a VIS-LED lamp during LCM. CONCLUSIONS: LCM must be optimized to work satisfactorily in difficult tissues. We describe a work flow for fresh frozen normal breast tissue where fat is inclined to cause problems if sample treatment is not adapted to this tissue. We also show that the Phi29-based Repli-g(® )WGA kit (Qiagen) is a feasible approach to amplify DNA of high quality prior to genome wide analyses such as SNP profiling. BioMed Central 2011-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3068970/ /pubmed/21418556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-69 Text en Copyright ©2011 Hedenfalk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Aaltonen, Kristina E Ebbesson, Anna Wigerup, Caroline Hedenfalk, Ingrid Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses |
title | Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses |
title_full | Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses |
title_fullStr | Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses |
title_short | Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses |
title_sort | laser capture microdissection (lcm) and whole genome amplification (wga) of dna from normal breast tissue --- optimization for genome wide array analyses |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-69 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aaltonenkristinae lasercapturemicrodissectionlcmandwholegenomeamplificationwgaofdnafromnormalbreasttissueoptimizationforgenomewidearrayanalyses AT ebbessonanna lasercapturemicrodissectionlcmandwholegenomeamplificationwgaofdnafromnormalbreasttissueoptimizationforgenomewidearrayanalyses AT wigerupcaroline lasercapturemicrodissectionlcmandwholegenomeamplificationwgaofdnafromnormalbreasttissueoptimizationforgenomewidearrayanalyses AT hedenfalkingrid lasercapturemicrodissectionlcmandwholegenomeamplificationwgaofdnafromnormalbreasttissueoptimizationforgenomewidearrayanalyses |