Cargando…
An Arthroscopic Device to Assess Articular Cartilage Defects and Treatment with a Hydrogel
The hydraulic resistance R across osteochondral tissue, especially articular cartilage, decreases with degeneration and erosion. Clinically useful measures to quantify and diagnose the extent of cartilage degeneration and efficacy of repair strategies, especially with regard to pressure maintenance,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21107696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0209-x |
_version_ | 1782201331341066240 |
---|---|
author | McCarty, William J. Luan, Anna Sundaramurthy, Priya Urbanczyk, Caryn Patel, Atal Hahr, Jacob Sotoudeh, Mohammad Ratcliffe, Anthony Sah, Robert L. |
author_facet | McCarty, William J. Luan, Anna Sundaramurthy, Priya Urbanczyk, Caryn Patel, Atal Hahr, Jacob Sotoudeh, Mohammad Ratcliffe, Anthony Sah, Robert L. |
author_sort | McCarty, William J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The hydraulic resistance R across osteochondral tissue, especially articular cartilage, decreases with degeneration and erosion. Clinically useful measures to quantify and diagnose the extent of cartilage degeneration and efficacy of repair strategies, especially with regard to pressure maintenance, are still developing. The hypothesis of this study was that hydraulic resistance provides a quantitative measure of osteochondral tissue that could be used to evaluate the state of cartilage damage and repair. The aims were to (1) develop a device to measure R in an arthroscopic setting, (2) determine whether the device could detect differences in R for cartilage, an osteochondral defect, and cartilage treated using a hydrogel ex vivo, and (3) determine how quickly such differences could be discerned. The apparent hydraulic resistance of defect samples was ~35% less than intact cartilage controls, while the resistance of hydrogel-filled groups was not statistically different than controls, suggesting some restoration of fluid pressurization in the defect region by the hydrogel. Differences in hydraulic resistance between control and defect groups were apparent after 4 s. The results indicate that the measurement of R is feasible for rapid and quantitative functional assessment of the extent of osteochondral defects and repair. The arthroscopic compatibility of the device demonstrates the potential for this measurement to be made in a clinical setting. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3069304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30693042011-05-02 An Arthroscopic Device to Assess Articular Cartilage Defects and Treatment with a Hydrogel McCarty, William J. Luan, Anna Sundaramurthy, Priya Urbanczyk, Caryn Patel, Atal Hahr, Jacob Sotoudeh, Mohammad Ratcliffe, Anthony Sah, Robert L. Ann Biomed Eng Article The hydraulic resistance R across osteochondral tissue, especially articular cartilage, decreases with degeneration and erosion. Clinically useful measures to quantify and diagnose the extent of cartilage degeneration and efficacy of repair strategies, especially with regard to pressure maintenance, are still developing. The hypothesis of this study was that hydraulic resistance provides a quantitative measure of osteochondral tissue that could be used to evaluate the state of cartilage damage and repair. The aims were to (1) develop a device to measure R in an arthroscopic setting, (2) determine whether the device could detect differences in R for cartilage, an osteochondral defect, and cartilage treated using a hydrogel ex vivo, and (3) determine how quickly such differences could be discerned. The apparent hydraulic resistance of defect samples was ~35% less than intact cartilage controls, while the resistance of hydrogel-filled groups was not statistically different than controls, suggesting some restoration of fluid pressurization in the defect region by the hydrogel. Differences in hydraulic resistance between control and defect groups were apparent after 4 s. The results indicate that the measurement of R is feasible for rapid and quantitative functional assessment of the extent of osteochondral defects and repair. The arthroscopic compatibility of the device demonstrates the potential for this measurement to be made in a clinical setting. Springer US 2010-11-24 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3069304/ /pubmed/21107696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0209-x Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article McCarty, William J. Luan, Anna Sundaramurthy, Priya Urbanczyk, Caryn Patel, Atal Hahr, Jacob Sotoudeh, Mohammad Ratcliffe, Anthony Sah, Robert L. An Arthroscopic Device to Assess Articular Cartilage Defects and Treatment with a Hydrogel |
title | An Arthroscopic Device to Assess Articular Cartilage Defects and Treatment with a Hydrogel |
title_full | An Arthroscopic Device to Assess Articular Cartilage Defects and Treatment with a Hydrogel |
title_fullStr | An Arthroscopic Device to Assess Articular Cartilage Defects and Treatment with a Hydrogel |
title_full_unstemmed | An Arthroscopic Device to Assess Articular Cartilage Defects and Treatment with a Hydrogel |
title_short | An Arthroscopic Device to Assess Articular Cartilage Defects and Treatment with a Hydrogel |
title_sort | arthroscopic device to assess articular cartilage defects and treatment with a hydrogel |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21107696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0209-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccartywilliamj anarthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT luananna anarthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT sundaramurthypriya anarthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT urbanczykcaryn anarthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT patelatal anarthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT hahrjacob anarthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT sotoudehmohammad anarthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT ratcliffeanthony anarthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT sahrobertl anarthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT mccartywilliamj arthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT luananna arthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT sundaramurthypriya arthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT urbanczykcaryn arthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT patelatal arthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT hahrjacob arthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT sotoudehmohammad arthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT ratcliffeanthony arthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel AT sahrobertl arthroscopicdevicetoassessarticularcartilagedefectsandtreatmentwithahydrogel |