Cargando…

Myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: A [13N]ammonia PET study

INTRODUCTION: [13N]ammonia PET allows quantification of myocardial perfusion. The similarity between peripheral flow and myocardial perfusion is unclear. We compared perfusion flow in the myocardium with the upper limb during rest and adenosine stress [13N]ammonia PET to establish whether peripheral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scholtens, A. M., Tio, R. A., Willemsen, A., Dierckx, R. A. J. O., Boersma, H. H., Zeebregts, C. J., Glaudemans, A. W. J. M., Slart, R. H. J. A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9339-2
_version_ 1782201332780761088
author Scholtens, A. M.
Tio, R. A.
Willemsen, A.
Dierckx, R. A. J. O.
Boersma, H. H.
Zeebregts, C. J.
Glaudemans, A. W. J. M.
Slart, R. H. J. A.
author_facet Scholtens, A. M.
Tio, R. A.
Willemsen, A.
Dierckx, R. A. J. O.
Boersma, H. H.
Zeebregts, C. J.
Glaudemans, A. W. J. M.
Slart, R. H. J. A.
author_sort Scholtens, A. M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: [13N]ammonia PET allows quantification of myocardial perfusion. The similarity between peripheral flow and myocardial perfusion is unclear. We compared perfusion flow in the myocardium with the upper limb during rest and adenosine stress [13N]ammonia PET to establish whether peripheral perfusion reserve (PPR) correlates with MPR. METHODS: [13N]ammonia myocardial perfusion PET-scans of 58 patients were evaluated (27 men, 31 women, age 64 ± 13 years) and were divided in four subgroups: patients with coronary artery disease (CAD, n = 15), cardiac syndrome X (SX, n = 14), idiopathic dilating cardiomyopathy (DCM, n = 16), and normal controls (NC, n = 13). Peripheral limb perfusion was measured in the muscular tissue of the proximal upper limb and quantified through a 2-tissue-compartment model and the PPR was calculated (stress/rest ratio). MPR was also calculated by a 2-tissue-compartment model. The PPR results were compared with the MPR findings. RESULTS: Mean myocardial perfusion increased significantly in all groups as evidenced by the MPR (CAD 1.99 ± 0.47; SX 1.39 ± 0.31; DCM 1.72 ± 0.69; NC 2.91 ± 0.78). Mean peripheral perfusion also increased but not significantly and accompanied with great variations within and between groups (mean PPR: CAD 1.30 ± 0.79; SX 1.36 ± 0.71; DCM 1.60 ± 1.22; NC 1.27 ± 0.63). The mean difference between PPR and MPR for all subpopulations varied widely. No significant correlations in flow reserve were found between peripheral and myocardial microcirculatory beds in any of the groups (Total group: r = −0.07, SEE = 0.70, CAD: r = 0.14, SEE = 0.48, SX: r = 0.17, SEE = 0.30, DCM: r = −0.11, SEE = 0.71, NC: r = −0.19, SEE = 0.80). CONCLUSION: No correlations between myocardial and peripheral perfusion (reserve) were found in different patient populations in the same PET session. This suggests a functional difference between peripheral and myocardial flow in the response to intravenously administered adenosine stress.
format Text
id pubmed-3069313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30693132011-05-02 Myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: A [13N]ammonia PET study Scholtens, A. M. Tio, R. A. Willemsen, A. Dierckx, R. A. J. O. Boersma, H. H. Zeebregts, C. J. Glaudemans, A. W. J. M. Slart, R. H. J. A. J Nucl Cardiol Original Article INTRODUCTION: [13N]ammonia PET allows quantification of myocardial perfusion. The similarity between peripheral flow and myocardial perfusion is unclear. We compared perfusion flow in the myocardium with the upper limb during rest and adenosine stress [13N]ammonia PET to establish whether peripheral perfusion reserve (PPR) correlates with MPR. METHODS: [13N]ammonia myocardial perfusion PET-scans of 58 patients were evaluated (27 men, 31 women, age 64 ± 13 years) and were divided in four subgroups: patients with coronary artery disease (CAD, n = 15), cardiac syndrome X (SX, n = 14), idiopathic dilating cardiomyopathy (DCM, n = 16), and normal controls (NC, n = 13). Peripheral limb perfusion was measured in the muscular tissue of the proximal upper limb and quantified through a 2-tissue-compartment model and the PPR was calculated (stress/rest ratio). MPR was also calculated by a 2-tissue-compartment model. The PPR results were compared with the MPR findings. RESULTS: Mean myocardial perfusion increased significantly in all groups as evidenced by the MPR (CAD 1.99 ± 0.47; SX 1.39 ± 0.31; DCM 1.72 ± 0.69; NC 2.91 ± 0.78). Mean peripheral perfusion also increased but not significantly and accompanied with great variations within and between groups (mean PPR: CAD 1.30 ± 0.79; SX 1.36 ± 0.71; DCM 1.60 ± 1.22; NC 1.27 ± 0.63). The mean difference between PPR and MPR for all subpopulations varied widely. No significant correlations in flow reserve were found between peripheral and myocardial microcirculatory beds in any of the groups (Total group: r = −0.07, SEE = 0.70, CAD: r = 0.14, SEE = 0.48, SX: r = 0.17, SEE = 0.30, DCM: r = −0.11, SEE = 0.71, NC: r = −0.19, SEE = 0.80). CONCLUSION: No correlations between myocardial and peripheral perfusion (reserve) were found in different patient populations in the same PET session. This suggests a functional difference between peripheral and myocardial flow in the response to intravenously administered adenosine stress. Springer-Verlag 2011-02-23 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3069313/ /pubmed/21347555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9339-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Scholtens, A. M.
Tio, R. A.
Willemsen, A.
Dierckx, R. A. J. O.
Boersma, H. H.
Zeebregts, C. J.
Glaudemans, A. W. J. M.
Slart, R. H. J. A.
Myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: A [13N]ammonia PET study
title Myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: A [13N]ammonia PET study
title_full Myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: A [13N]ammonia PET study
title_fullStr Myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: A [13N]ammonia PET study
title_full_unstemmed Myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: A [13N]ammonia PET study
title_short Myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: A [13N]ammonia PET study
title_sort myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: a [13n]ammonia pet study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9339-2
work_keys_str_mv AT scholtensam myocardialperfusionreservecomparedwithperipheralperfusionreservea13nammoniapetstudy
AT tiora myocardialperfusionreservecomparedwithperipheralperfusionreservea13nammoniapetstudy
AT willemsena myocardialperfusionreservecomparedwithperipheralperfusionreservea13nammoniapetstudy
AT dierckxrajo myocardialperfusionreservecomparedwithperipheralperfusionreservea13nammoniapetstudy
AT boersmahh myocardialperfusionreservecomparedwithperipheralperfusionreservea13nammoniapetstudy
AT zeebregtscj myocardialperfusionreservecomparedwithperipheralperfusionreservea13nammoniapetstudy
AT glaudemansawjm myocardialperfusionreservecomparedwithperipheralperfusionreservea13nammoniapetstudy
AT slartrhja myocardialperfusionreservecomparedwithperipheralperfusionreservea13nammoniapetstudy