Cargando…
Measuring physical activity during pregnancy
BACKGROUND: Currently, little is known about physical activity patterns in pregnancy with prior estimates predominantly based on subjective assessment measures that are prone to error. Given the increasing obesity rates and the importance of physical activity in pregnancy, we evaluated the relations...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-19 |
_version_ | 1782201359695609856 |
---|---|
author | Harrison, Cheryce L Thompson, Russell G Teede, Helena J Lombard, Catherine B |
author_facet | Harrison, Cheryce L Thompson, Russell G Teede, Helena J Lombard, Catherine B |
author_sort | Harrison, Cheryce L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Currently, little is known about physical activity patterns in pregnancy with prior estimates predominantly based on subjective assessment measures that are prone to error. Given the increasing obesity rates and the importance of physical activity in pregnancy, we evaluated the relationship and agreement between subjective and objective physical activity assessment tools to inform researchers and clinicians on optimal assessment of physical activity in pregnancy. METHODS: 48 pregnant women between 26-28 weeks gestation were recruited. The Yamax pedometer and Actigraph accelerometer were worn for 5-7 days under free living conditions and thereafter the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was completed. IPAQ and pedometer estimates of activity were compared to the more robust and accurate accelerometer data. RESULTS: Of 48 women recruited, 30 women completed the study (mean age: 33.6 ± 4.7 years; mean BMI: 31.2 ± 5.1 kg/m(2)) and 18 were excluded (failure to wear [n = 8] and incomplete data [n = 10]). The accelerometer and pedometer correlated significantly on estimation of daily steps (ρ = 0.69, p < 0.01) and had good absolute agreement with low systematic error (mean difference: 505 ± 1498 steps/day). Accelerometer and IPAQ estimates of total, light and moderate Metabolic Equivalent minutes/day (MET min(-1 )day(-1)) were not significantly correlated and there was poor absolute agreement. Relative to the accelerometer, the IPAQ under predicted daily total METs (105.76 ± 259.13 min(-1 )day(-1)) and light METs (255.55 ± 128.41 min(-1 )day(-1)) and over predicted moderate METs (-112.25 ± 166.41 min(-1 )day(-1)). CONCLUSION: Compared with the accelerometer, the pedometer appears to provide a reliable estimate of physical activity in pregnancy, whereas the subjective IPAQ measure performed less accurately in this setting. Future research measuring activity in pregnancy should optimally encompass objective measures of physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Number: ACTRN12608000233325. Registered 7/5/2008. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3069935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30699352011-04-02 Measuring physical activity during pregnancy Harrison, Cheryce L Thompson, Russell G Teede, Helena J Lombard, Catherine B Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Currently, little is known about physical activity patterns in pregnancy with prior estimates predominantly based on subjective assessment measures that are prone to error. Given the increasing obesity rates and the importance of physical activity in pregnancy, we evaluated the relationship and agreement between subjective and objective physical activity assessment tools to inform researchers and clinicians on optimal assessment of physical activity in pregnancy. METHODS: 48 pregnant women between 26-28 weeks gestation were recruited. The Yamax pedometer and Actigraph accelerometer were worn for 5-7 days under free living conditions and thereafter the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was completed. IPAQ and pedometer estimates of activity were compared to the more robust and accurate accelerometer data. RESULTS: Of 48 women recruited, 30 women completed the study (mean age: 33.6 ± 4.7 years; mean BMI: 31.2 ± 5.1 kg/m(2)) and 18 were excluded (failure to wear [n = 8] and incomplete data [n = 10]). The accelerometer and pedometer correlated significantly on estimation of daily steps (ρ = 0.69, p < 0.01) and had good absolute agreement with low systematic error (mean difference: 505 ± 1498 steps/day). Accelerometer and IPAQ estimates of total, light and moderate Metabolic Equivalent minutes/day (MET min(-1 )day(-1)) were not significantly correlated and there was poor absolute agreement. Relative to the accelerometer, the IPAQ under predicted daily total METs (105.76 ± 259.13 min(-1 )day(-1)) and light METs (255.55 ± 128.41 min(-1 )day(-1)) and over predicted moderate METs (-112.25 ± 166.41 min(-1 )day(-1)). CONCLUSION: Compared with the accelerometer, the pedometer appears to provide a reliable estimate of physical activity in pregnancy, whereas the subjective IPAQ measure performed less accurately in this setting. Future research measuring activity in pregnancy should optimally encompass objective measures of physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Number: ACTRN12608000233325. Registered 7/5/2008. BioMed Central 2011-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3069935/ /pubmed/21418609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-19 Text en Copyright ©2011 Harrison et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Harrison, Cheryce L Thompson, Russell G Teede, Helena J Lombard, Catherine B Measuring physical activity during pregnancy |
title | Measuring physical activity during pregnancy |
title_full | Measuring physical activity during pregnancy |
title_fullStr | Measuring physical activity during pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring physical activity during pregnancy |
title_short | Measuring physical activity during pregnancy |
title_sort | measuring physical activity during pregnancy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisoncherycel measuringphysicalactivityduringpregnancy AT thompsonrussellg measuringphysicalactivityduringpregnancy AT teedehelenaj measuringphysicalactivityduringpregnancy AT lombardcatherineb measuringphysicalactivityduringpregnancy |