Cargando…

Estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling

BACKGROUND: The United States Environmental Protection Agency's Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data are frequently used to estimate a community's exposure to pollution. However, this estimation process often uses underdeveloped geographic theory. Spatial interaction modeling provides a more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Conley, Jamison F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3070612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-10-20
_version_ 1782201391387770880
author Conley, Jamison F
author_facet Conley, Jamison F
author_sort Conley, Jamison F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The United States Environmental Protection Agency's Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data are frequently used to estimate a community's exposure to pollution. However, this estimation process often uses underdeveloped geographic theory. Spatial interaction modeling provides a more realistic approach to this estimation process. This paper uses four sets of data: lung cancer age-adjusted mortality rates from the years 1990 through 2006 inclusive from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, TRI releases of carcinogens from 1987 to 1996, covariates associated with lung cancer, and the EPA's Risk-Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) model. RESULTS: The impact of the volume of carcinogenic TRI releases on each county's lung cancer mortality rates was calculated using six spatial interaction functions (containment, buffer, power decay, exponential decay, quadratic decay, and RSEI estimates) and evaluated with four multivariate regression methods (linear, generalized linear, spatial lag, and spatial error). Akaike Information Criterion values and P values of spatial interaction terms were computed. The impacts calculated from the interaction models were also mapped. Buffer and quadratic interaction functions had the lowest AIC values (22298 and 22525 respectively), although the gains from including the spatial interaction terms were diminished with spatial error and spatial lag regression. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different methods for estimating the spatial risk posed by pollution from TRI sites can give different results about the impact of those sites on health outcomes. The most reliable estimates did not always come from the most complex methods.
format Text
id pubmed-3070612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30706122011-04-05 Estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling Conley, Jamison F Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: The United States Environmental Protection Agency's Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) data are frequently used to estimate a community's exposure to pollution. However, this estimation process often uses underdeveloped geographic theory. Spatial interaction modeling provides a more realistic approach to this estimation process. This paper uses four sets of data: lung cancer age-adjusted mortality rates from the years 1990 through 2006 inclusive from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, TRI releases of carcinogens from 1987 to 1996, covariates associated with lung cancer, and the EPA's Risk-Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI) model. RESULTS: The impact of the volume of carcinogenic TRI releases on each county's lung cancer mortality rates was calculated using six spatial interaction functions (containment, buffer, power decay, exponential decay, quadratic decay, and RSEI estimates) and evaluated with four multivariate regression methods (linear, generalized linear, spatial lag, and spatial error). Akaike Information Criterion values and P values of spatial interaction terms were computed. The impacts calculated from the interaction models were also mapped. Buffer and quadratic interaction functions had the lowest AIC values (22298 and 22525 respectively), although the gains from including the spatial interaction terms were diminished with spatial error and spatial lag regression. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different methods for estimating the spatial risk posed by pollution from TRI sites can give different results about the impact of those sites on health outcomes. The most reliable estimates did not always come from the most complex methods. BioMed Central 2011-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3070612/ /pubmed/21418644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-10-20 Text en Copyright ©2011 Conley; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Conley, Jamison F
Estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling
title Estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling
title_full Estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling
title_fullStr Estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling
title_short Estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling
title_sort estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3070612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-10-20
work_keys_str_mv AT conleyjamisonf estimationofexposuretotoxicreleasesusingspatialinteractionmodeling