Cargando…

Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy

BACKGROUND: Several publications have reported the successful, safe use of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Classic devices in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. However, there have been no studies that have examined the application of volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or pressure-controlled ven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeon, Woo Jae, Cho, Sang Yun, Bang, Mi Rang, Ko, So-Young
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3071479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21490817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2011.60.3.167
_version_ 1782201449540747264
author Jeon, Woo Jae
Cho, Sang Yun
Bang, Mi Rang
Ko, So-Young
author_facet Jeon, Woo Jae
Cho, Sang Yun
Bang, Mi Rang
Ko, So-Young
author_sort Jeon, Woo Jae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several publications have reported the successful, safe use of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Classic devices in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. However, there have been no studies that have examined the application of volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) using a LMA during gynecological laparoscopy. The aim of this study is to compare how the VCV and PCV modes and using a LMA affect the pulmonary mechanics, the gas exchange and the cardiovascular responses in patients who are undergoing gynecological laparoscopy. METHODS: Sixty female patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups, (the VCV or PCV groups). In the VCV group, baseline ventilation of the lung was performed with volume-controlled ventilation and a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg ideal body weight (IBW). In the PCV group, baseline ventilation of the lung using pressure-controlled ventilation was initiated with a peak airway pressure that provided a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg IBW and an upper limit of 35 cmH(2)O. The end-tidal CO(2), the peak airway pressures (P(peak)), the compliance, the airway resistance and the arterial oxygen saturation were recorded at T1: 5 minutes after insertion of the laryngeal airway, and at T2 and T3: 5 and 15 minutes, respectively, after CO(2) insufflation. RESULTS: The P(peak) at 5 minutes and 15 minutes after CO(2) insufflation were significantly increased compared to the baseline values in both groups. Also, at 5 minutes and 15 minutes after CO(2) insufflation, there were significant differences of the P(peak) between the two groups. The compliance decreased in both groups after creating the pneumopertoneim (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that PCV may be an effective method of ventilation during gynecological laparoscopy, and it ensures oxygenation while minimizing the increases of the peak airway pressure after CO(2) insufflation.
format Text
id pubmed-3071479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30714792011-04-13 Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy Jeon, Woo Jae Cho, Sang Yun Bang, Mi Rang Ko, So-Young Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Several publications have reported the successful, safe use of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Classic devices in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. However, there have been no studies that have examined the application of volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) using a LMA during gynecological laparoscopy. The aim of this study is to compare how the VCV and PCV modes and using a LMA affect the pulmonary mechanics, the gas exchange and the cardiovascular responses in patients who are undergoing gynecological laparoscopy. METHODS: Sixty female patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups, (the VCV or PCV groups). In the VCV group, baseline ventilation of the lung was performed with volume-controlled ventilation and a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg ideal body weight (IBW). In the PCV group, baseline ventilation of the lung using pressure-controlled ventilation was initiated with a peak airway pressure that provided a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg IBW and an upper limit of 35 cmH(2)O. The end-tidal CO(2), the peak airway pressures (P(peak)), the compliance, the airway resistance and the arterial oxygen saturation were recorded at T1: 5 minutes after insertion of the laryngeal airway, and at T2 and T3: 5 and 15 minutes, respectively, after CO(2) insufflation. RESULTS: The P(peak) at 5 minutes and 15 minutes after CO(2) insufflation were significantly increased compared to the baseline values in both groups. Also, at 5 minutes and 15 minutes after CO(2) insufflation, there were significant differences of the P(peak) between the two groups. The compliance decreased in both groups after creating the pneumopertoneim (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that PCV may be an effective method of ventilation during gynecological laparoscopy, and it ensures oxygenation while minimizing the increases of the peak airway pressure after CO(2) insufflation. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2011-03 2011-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3071479/ /pubmed/21490817 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2011.60.3.167 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Jeon, Woo Jae
Cho, Sang Yun
Bang, Mi Rang
Ko, So-Young
Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy
title Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy
title_full Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy
title_fullStr Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy
title_short Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy
title_sort comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway during gynecological laparoscopy
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3071479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21490817
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2011.60.3.167
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonwoojae comparisonofvolumecontrolledandpressurecontrolledventilationusingalaryngealmaskairwayduringgynecologicallaparoscopy
AT chosangyun comparisonofvolumecontrolledandpressurecontrolledventilationusingalaryngealmaskairwayduringgynecologicallaparoscopy
AT bangmirang comparisonofvolumecontrolledandpressurecontrolledventilationusingalaryngealmaskairwayduringgynecologicallaparoscopy
AT kosoyoung comparisonofvolumecontrolledandpressurecontrolledventilationusingalaryngealmaskairwayduringgynecologicallaparoscopy