Cargando…

Trust Transitivity in Social Networks

Non-centralized recommendation-based decision making is a central feature of several social and technological processes, such as market dynamics, peer-to-peer file-sharing and the web of trust of digital certification. We investigate the properties of trust propagation on networks, based on a simple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richters, Oliver, Peixoto, Tiago P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3071725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21483683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018384
_version_ 1782201461285847040
author Richters, Oliver
Peixoto, Tiago P.
author_facet Richters, Oliver
Peixoto, Tiago P.
author_sort Richters, Oliver
collection PubMed
description Non-centralized recommendation-based decision making is a central feature of several social and technological processes, such as market dynamics, peer-to-peer file-sharing and the web of trust of digital certification. We investigate the properties of trust propagation on networks, based on a simple metric of trust transitivity. We investigate analytically the percolation properties of trust transitivity in random networks with arbitrary in/out-degree distributions, and compare with numerical realizations. We find that the existence of a non-zero fraction of absolute trust (i.e. entirely confident trust) is a requirement for the viability of global trust propagation in large systems: The average pair-wise trust is marked by a discontinuous transition at a specific fraction of absolute trust, below which it vanishes. Furthermore, we perform an extensive analysis of the Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) web of trust, in view of the concepts introduced. We compare different scenarios of trust distribution: community- and authority-centered. We find that these scenarios lead to sharply different patterns of trust propagation, due to the segregation of authority hubs and densely-connected communities. While the authority-centered scenario is more efficient, and leads to higher average trust values, it favours weakly-connected “fringe” nodes, which are directly trusted by authorities. The community-centered scheme, on the other hand, favours nodes with intermediate in/out-degrees, in detriment of the authorities and its “fringe” peers.
format Text
id pubmed-3071725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30717252011-04-11 Trust Transitivity in Social Networks Richters, Oliver Peixoto, Tiago P. PLoS One Research Article Non-centralized recommendation-based decision making is a central feature of several social and technological processes, such as market dynamics, peer-to-peer file-sharing and the web of trust of digital certification. We investigate the properties of trust propagation on networks, based on a simple metric of trust transitivity. We investigate analytically the percolation properties of trust transitivity in random networks with arbitrary in/out-degree distributions, and compare with numerical realizations. We find that the existence of a non-zero fraction of absolute trust (i.e. entirely confident trust) is a requirement for the viability of global trust propagation in large systems: The average pair-wise trust is marked by a discontinuous transition at a specific fraction of absolute trust, below which it vanishes. Furthermore, we perform an extensive analysis of the Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) web of trust, in view of the concepts introduced. We compare different scenarios of trust distribution: community- and authority-centered. We find that these scenarios lead to sharply different patterns of trust propagation, due to the segregation of authority hubs and densely-connected communities. While the authority-centered scenario is more efficient, and leads to higher average trust values, it favours weakly-connected “fringe” nodes, which are directly trusted by authorities. The community-centered scheme, on the other hand, favours nodes with intermediate in/out-degrees, in detriment of the authorities and its “fringe” peers. Public Library of Science 2011-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3071725/ /pubmed/21483683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018384 Text en Richters, Peixoto. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Richters, Oliver
Peixoto, Tiago P.
Trust Transitivity in Social Networks
title Trust Transitivity in Social Networks
title_full Trust Transitivity in Social Networks
title_fullStr Trust Transitivity in Social Networks
title_full_unstemmed Trust Transitivity in Social Networks
title_short Trust Transitivity in Social Networks
title_sort trust transitivity in social networks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3071725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21483683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018384
work_keys_str_mv AT richtersoliver trusttransitivityinsocialnetworks
AT peixototiagop trusttransitivityinsocialnetworks