Cargando…
Trust Transitivity in Social Networks
Non-centralized recommendation-based decision making is a central feature of several social and technological processes, such as market dynamics, peer-to-peer file-sharing and the web of trust of digital certification. We investigate the properties of trust propagation on networks, based on a simple...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3071725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21483683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018384 |
_version_ | 1782201461285847040 |
---|---|
author | Richters, Oliver Peixoto, Tiago P. |
author_facet | Richters, Oliver Peixoto, Tiago P. |
author_sort | Richters, Oliver |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non-centralized recommendation-based decision making is a central feature of several social and technological processes, such as market dynamics, peer-to-peer file-sharing and the web of trust of digital certification. We investigate the properties of trust propagation on networks, based on a simple metric of trust transitivity. We investigate analytically the percolation properties of trust transitivity in random networks with arbitrary in/out-degree distributions, and compare with numerical realizations. We find that the existence of a non-zero fraction of absolute trust (i.e. entirely confident trust) is a requirement for the viability of global trust propagation in large systems: The average pair-wise trust is marked by a discontinuous transition at a specific fraction of absolute trust, below which it vanishes. Furthermore, we perform an extensive analysis of the Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) web of trust, in view of the concepts introduced. We compare different scenarios of trust distribution: community- and authority-centered. We find that these scenarios lead to sharply different patterns of trust propagation, due to the segregation of authority hubs and densely-connected communities. While the authority-centered scenario is more efficient, and leads to higher average trust values, it favours weakly-connected “fringe” nodes, which are directly trusted by authorities. The community-centered scheme, on the other hand, favours nodes with intermediate in/out-degrees, in detriment of the authorities and its “fringe” peers. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3071725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30717252011-04-11 Trust Transitivity in Social Networks Richters, Oliver Peixoto, Tiago P. PLoS One Research Article Non-centralized recommendation-based decision making is a central feature of several social and technological processes, such as market dynamics, peer-to-peer file-sharing and the web of trust of digital certification. We investigate the properties of trust propagation on networks, based on a simple metric of trust transitivity. We investigate analytically the percolation properties of trust transitivity in random networks with arbitrary in/out-degree distributions, and compare with numerical realizations. We find that the existence of a non-zero fraction of absolute trust (i.e. entirely confident trust) is a requirement for the viability of global trust propagation in large systems: The average pair-wise trust is marked by a discontinuous transition at a specific fraction of absolute trust, below which it vanishes. Furthermore, we perform an extensive analysis of the Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) web of trust, in view of the concepts introduced. We compare different scenarios of trust distribution: community- and authority-centered. We find that these scenarios lead to sharply different patterns of trust propagation, due to the segregation of authority hubs and densely-connected communities. While the authority-centered scenario is more efficient, and leads to higher average trust values, it favours weakly-connected “fringe” nodes, which are directly trusted by authorities. The community-centered scheme, on the other hand, favours nodes with intermediate in/out-degrees, in detriment of the authorities and its “fringe” peers. Public Library of Science 2011-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3071725/ /pubmed/21483683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018384 Text en Richters, Peixoto. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Richters, Oliver Peixoto, Tiago P. Trust Transitivity in Social Networks |
title | Trust Transitivity in Social Networks |
title_full | Trust Transitivity in Social Networks |
title_fullStr | Trust Transitivity in Social Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Trust Transitivity in Social Networks |
title_short | Trust Transitivity in Social Networks |
title_sort | trust transitivity in social networks |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3071725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21483683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richtersoliver trusttransitivityinsocialnetworks AT peixototiagop trusttransitivityinsocialnetworks |