Cargando…
Cardiovascular risk scores do not account for the effect of treatment: a review
OBJECTIVE: To compare the strengths and limitations of cardiovascular risk scores available for clinicians in assessing the global (absolute) risk of cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: Review of cardiovascular risk scores. DATA SOURCES: Medline (1966 to May 2009) using a mixture of MeSH terms and free...
Autores principales: | Liew, S M, Doust, J, Glasziou, P |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3072200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21474616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.220442 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review
por: Muthee, Tonny B., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Do we AGREE on the targets of antihypertensive drug treatment in older adults: a systematic review of guidelines on primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases
por: Bogaerts, Jonathan M K, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases
por: Zhu, Ye, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Contribution of Individual Exercise Training Components to Clinical Outcomes in Randomised Controlled Trials of Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression
por: Abell, Bridget, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Do B Vitamins Enhance the Effect of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Diseases? A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
por: Zhu, Jie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)