Cargando…

Selection on the wing in Heliconius butterflies

ASBTRACT: To what extent population structure favours the establishment of new phenotypes within a species remains a fundamental question in evolutionary studies. By reducing gene flow, habitat fragmentation is a major factor shaping the genetic structuring of populations, favouring isolation of sma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Legrand, Delphine, Stevens, Virginie M, Baguette, Michel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3072351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21443788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-31
_version_ 1782201538020638720
author Legrand, Delphine
Stevens, Virginie M
Baguette, Michel
author_facet Legrand, Delphine
Stevens, Virginie M
Baguette, Michel
author_sort Legrand, Delphine
collection PubMed
description ASBTRACT: To what extent population structure favours the establishment of new phenotypes within a species remains a fundamental question in evolutionary studies. By reducing gene flow, habitat fragmentation is a major factor shaping the genetic structuring of populations, favouring isolation of small populations in which drift may rapidly change frequencies of new variants. When these variants provide advantages to individuals, the combined effect of selection and drift can lead to rapid shifts in phenotypes. In a study published in BMC Genetics, Albuquerque de Moura et al. asked whether such a general pattern of population structure can be observed in Heliconius species, which could have strong implication in the evolution of colour pattern diversification in these butterflies. In this commentary we discuss the potential roles of these three processes (drift, selection and dispersal) on the evolution of Heliconius wing patterns in regard to the findings of a common fine-scale population structure within the co-mimetic species H. melpomene and H. erato. Indeed, a general pattern of population subdivision in the history of these two species may have provoked the major phenotypical shifts observed in their wing colour patterns. The suggestion that coupled environmental pressures (counter-selection of dispersal and selection on co-evolved traits) could be responsible for identical genetic differentiation profiles in H. erato and H. melpomene clearly merits further investigations using both detailed population genetic (including landscape genetic) and ecological studies.
format Text
id pubmed-3072351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30723512011-04-08 Selection on the wing in Heliconius butterflies Legrand, Delphine Stevens, Virginie M Baguette, Michel BMC Genet Commentary ASBTRACT: To what extent population structure favours the establishment of new phenotypes within a species remains a fundamental question in evolutionary studies. By reducing gene flow, habitat fragmentation is a major factor shaping the genetic structuring of populations, favouring isolation of small populations in which drift may rapidly change frequencies of new variants. When these variants provide advantages to individuals, the combined effect of selection and drift can lead to rapid shifts in phenotypes. In a study published in BMC Genetics, Albuquerque de Moura et al. asked whether such a general pattern of population structure can be observed in Heliconius species, which could have strong implication in the evolution of colour pattern diversification in these butterflies. In this commentary we discuss the potential roles of these three processes (drift, selection and dispersal) on the evolution of Heliconius wing patterns in regard to the findings of a common fine-scale population structure within the co-mimetic species H. melpomene and H. erato. Indeed, a general pattern of population subdivision in the history of these two species may have provoked the major phenotypical shifts observed in their wing colour patterns. The suggestion that coupled environmental pressures (counter-selection of dispersal and selection on co-evolved traits) could be responsible for identical genetic differentiation profiles in H. erato and H. melpomene clearly merits further investigations using both detailed population genetic (including landscape genetic) and ecological studies. BioMed Central 2011-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3072351/ /pubmed/21443788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-31 Text en Copyright ©2011 Legrand et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Legrand, Delphine
Stevens, Virginie M
Baguette, Michel
Selection on the wing in Heliconius butterflies
title Selection on the wing in Heliconius butterflies
title_full Selection on the wing in Heliconius butterflies
title_fullStr Selection on the wing in Heliconius butterflies
title_full_unstemmed Selection on the wing in Heliconius butterflies
title_short Selection on the wing in Heliconius butterflies
title_sort selection on the wing in heliconius butterflies
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3072351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21443788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-31
work_keys_str_mv AT legranddelphine selectiononthewinginheliconiusbutterflies
AT stevensvirginiem selectiononthewinginheliconiusbutterflies
AT baguettemichel selectiononthewinginheliconiusbutterflies