Cargando…

How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

BACKGROUND: Guidelines continue to be underutilized, and a variety of strategies to improve their use have been suboptimal. Modifying guideline features represents an alternative, but untested way to promote their use. The purpose of this study was to identify and define features that facilitate gui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gagliardi, Anna R, Brouwers, Melissa C, Palda, Valerie A, Lemieux-Charles, Louise, Grimshaw, Jeremy M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3072935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21426574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-26
_version_ 1782201592646205440
author Gagliardi, Anna R
Brouwers, Melissa C
Palda, Valerie A
Lemieux-Charles, Louise
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
author_facet Gagliardi, Anna R
Brouwers, Melissa C
Palda, Valerie A
Lemieux-Charles, Louise
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
author_sort Gagliardi, Anna R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines continue to be underutilized, and a variety of strategies to improve their use have been suboptimal. Modifying guideline features represents an alternative, but untested way to promote their use. The purpose of this study was to identify and define features that facilitate guideline use, and examine whether and how they are included in current guidelines. METHODS: A guideline implementability framework was developed by reviewing the implementation science literature. We then examined whether guidelines included these, or additional implementability elements. Data were extracted from publicly available high quality guidelines reflecting primary and institutional care, reviewed independently by two individuals, who through discussion resolved conflicts, then by the research team. RESULTS: The final implementability framework included 22 elements organized in the domains of adaptability, usability, validity, applicability, communicability, accommodation, implementation, and evaluation. Data were extracted from 20 guidelines on the management of diabetes, hypertension, leg ulcer, and heart failure. Most contained a large volume of graded, narrative evidence, and tables featuring complementary clinical information. Few contained additional features that could improve guideline use. These included alternate versions for different users and purposes, summaries of evidence and recommendations, information to facilitate interaction with and involvement of patients, details of resource implications, and instructions on how to locally promote and monitor guideline use. There were no consistent trends by guideline topic. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous opportunities were identified by which guidelines could be modified to support various types of decision making by different users. New governance structures may be required to accommodate development of guidelines with these features. Further research is needed to validate the proposed framework of guideline implementability, develop methods for preparing this information, and evaluate how inclusion of this information influences guideline use.
format Text
id pubmed-3072935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30729352011-04-09 How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability Gagliardi, Anna R Brouwers, Melissa C Palda, Valerie A Lemieux-Charles, Louise Grimshaw, Jeremy M Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Guidelines continue to be underutilized, and a variety of strategies to improve their use have been suboptimal. Modifying guideline features represents an alternative, but untested way to promote their use. The purpose of this study was to identify and define features that facilitate guideline use, and examine whether and how they are included in current guidelines. METHODS: A guideline implementability framework was developed by reviewing the implementation science literature. We then examined whether guidelines included these, or additional implementability elements. Data were extracted from publicly available high quality guidelines reflecting primary and institutional care, reviewed independently by two individuals, who through discussion resolved conflicts, then by the research team. RESULTS: The final implementability framework included 22 elements organized in the domains of adaptability, usability, validity, applicability, communicability, accommodation, implementation, and evaluation. Data were extracted from 20 guidelines on the management of diabetes, hypertension, leg ulcer, and heart failure. Most contained a large volume of graded, narrative evidence, and tables featuring complementary clinical information. Few contained additional features that could improve guideline use. These included alternate versions for different users and purposes, summaries of evidence and recommendations, information to facilitate interaction with and involvement of patients, details of resource implications, and instructions on how to locally promote and monitor guideline use. There were no consistent trends by guideline topic. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous opportunities were identified by which guidelines could be modified to support various types of decision making by different users. New governance structures may be required to accommodate development of guidelines with these features. Further research is needed to validate the proposed framework of guideline implementability, develop methods for preparing this information, and evaluate how inclusion of this information influences guideline use. BioMed Central 2011-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3072935/ /pubmed/21426574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-26 Text en Copyright ©2011 Gagliardi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gagliardi, Anna R
Brouwers, Melissa C
Palda, Valerie A
Lemieux-Charles, Louise
Grimshaw, Jeremy M
How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability
title How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability
title_full How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability
title_fullStr How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability
title_full_unstemmed How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability
title_short How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability
title_sort how can we improve guideline use? a conceptual framework of implementability
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3072935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21426574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-26
work_keys_str_mv AT gagliardiannar howcanweimproveguidelineuseaconceptualframeworkofimplementability
AT brouwersmelissac howcanweimproveguidelineuseaconceptualframeworkofimplementability
AT paldavaleriea howcanweimproveguidelineuseaconceptualframeworkofimplementability
AT lemieuxcharleslouise howcanweimproveguidelineuseaconceptualframeworkofimplementability
AT grimshawjeremym howcanweimproveguidelineuseaconceptualframeworkofimplementability