Cargando…
Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus
Human movement performance is subject to interference if the performer simultaneously observes an incongruent action. It has been proposed that this phenomenon is due to motor contagion during simultaneous movement performance–observation, with coactivation of shared action performance and action ob...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17683237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915 |
_version_ | 1782201608918007808 |
---|---|
author | Stanley, James Gowen, Emma Miall, R. Chris |
author_facet | Stanley, James Gowen, Emma Miall, R. Chris |
author_sort | Stanley, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human movement performance is subject to interference if the performer simultaneously observes an incongruent action. It has been proposed that this phenomenon is due to motor contagion during simultaneous movement performance–observation, with coactivation of shared action performance and action observation circuitry in the premotor cortex. The present experiments compared the interference effect during observation of a moving person with observation of moving dot stimuli: The dot display followed either a biologically plausible or implausible velocity profile. Interference effects due to dot observation were present for both biological and nonbiological velocity profiles when the participants were informed that they were observing prerecorded human movement and were absent when the dot motion was described as computer generated. These results suggest that the observer's belief regarding the origin of the dot motion (human–computer generated) modulates the processing of the dot movement stimuli on their later integration within the motor system, such that the belief regarding their biological origin is a more important determinant of interference effects than the stimulus kinematics. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3073012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | American Psychological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30730122011-04-11 Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus Stanley, James Gowen, Emma Miall, R. Chris J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Articles Human movement performance is subject to interference if the performer simultaneously observes an incongruent action. It has been proposed that this phenomenon is due to motor contagion during simultaneous movement performance–observation, with coactivation of shared action performance and action observation circuitry in the premotor cortex. The present experiments compared the interference effect during observation of a moving person with observation of moving dot stimuli: The dot display followed either a biologically plausible or implausible velocity profile. Interference effects due to dot observation were present for both biological and nonbiological velocity profiles when the participants were informed that they were observing prerecorded human movement and were absent when the dot motion was described as computer generated. These results suggest that the observer's belief regarding the origin of the dot motion (human–computer generated) modulates the processing of the dot movement stimuli on their later integration within the motor system, such that the belief regarding their biological origin is a more important determinant of interference effects than the stimulus kinematics. American Psychological Association 2007-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3073012/ /pubmed/17683237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915 Text en © 2007 American Psychological Association. This article, manuscript, or document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association (APA). For non-commercial, education and research purposes, users may access, download, copy, display, and redistribute this article or manuscript as well as adapt, translate, or data and text mine the content contained in this document. For any such use of this document, appropriate attribution or bibliographic citation must be given. Users should not delete any copyright notices or disclaimers. For more information or to obtain permission beyond that granted here, visit http://www.apa.org/about/copyright.html. |
spellingShingle | Articles Stanley, James Gowen, Emma Miall, R. Chris Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus |
title | Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus |
title_full | Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus |
title_fullStr | Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus |
title_short | Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus |
title_sort | effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17683237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stanleyjames effectsofagencyonmovementinterferenceduringobservationofamovingdotstimulus AT gowenemma effectsofagencyonmovementinterferenceduringobservationofamovingdotstimulus AT miallrchris effectsofagencyonmovementinterferenceduringobservationofamovingdotstimulus |