Cargando…
Canada's Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance regulations: balancing the scales or tipping them?
BACKGROUND: In order to comply with the provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement, in 1993 the Canadian federal government introduced the Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance Linkage Regulations. These regulations were meant to achieve a balance between the timely entry of generic medi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21435247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-64 |
_version_ | 1782201654406283264 |
---|---|
author | Lexchin, Joel |
author_facet | Lexchin, Joel |
author_sort | Lexchin, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In order to comply with the provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement, in 1993 the Canadian federal government introduced the Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance Linkage Regulations. These regulations were meant to achieve a balance between the timely entry of generic medicines and the rights of patent holders. The regulations tied the regulatory approval of generic medicines to the patent status of the original brand-name product. DISCUSSION: Since their introduction the regulations have been a source of contention between the generic and the brand-name industry. While the regulations have generated a considerable amount of work for the Federal Court of Canada both sides dispute the interpretation of the "win rate" in the court cases. Similarly, there is no agreement on whether multiple patents on single drugs represent a legitimate activity by the brand-name industry or an "evergreening" tactic. The generic industry's position is that the regulations are being abused leading to the delay in the introduction of lower cost generic products by as much as 8 years. The brand-name companies counter that the regulations are necessary because injunctions against the introduction of generic products are frequently unavailable to them. The regulations were amended in 2006 and again in 2008 but both sides continue to claim that the regulations favour the other party. The battle around the regulations also has an international dimension with interventions by PhRMA, the trade association representing the United States based multinational companies, arguing that the regulations are not stringent enough and that Canada needs to be placed on the U.S. Priority Watch List of countries. Finally, there are multiple costs to Canadian society as a result of the NOC regulations. SUMMARY: Despite the rhetoric there has been almost no empiric academic research done into the effect of the regulations. In order to develop rational policy in this area a number of key research questions have been formulated. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3073891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30738912011-04-12 Canada's Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance regulations: balancing the scales or tipping them? Lexchin, Joel BMC Health Serv Res Debate BACKGROUND: In order to comply with the provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement, in 1993 the Canadian federal government introduced the Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance Linkage Regulations. These regulations were meant to achieve a balance between the timely entry of generic medicines and the rights of patent holders. The regulations tied the regulatory approval of generic medicines to the patent status of the original brand-name product. DISCUSSION: Since their introduction the regulations have been a source of contention between the generic and the brand-name industry. While the regulations have generated a considerable amount of work for the Federal Court of Canada both sides dispute the interpretation of the "win rate" in the court cases. Similarly, there is no agreement on whether multiple patents on single drugs represent a legitimate activity by the brand-name industry or an "evergreening" tactic. The generic industry's position is that the regulations are being abused leading to the delay in the introduction of lower cost generic products by as much as 8 years. The brand-name companies counter that the regulations are necessary because injunctions against the introduction of generic products are frequently unavailable to them. The regulations were amended in 2006 and again in 2008 but both sides continue to claim that the regulations favour the other party. The battle around the regulations also has an international dimension with interventions by PhRMA, the trade association representing the United States based multinational companies, arguing that the regulations are not stringent enough and that Canada needs to be placed on the U.S. Priority Watch List of countries. Finally, there are multiple costs to Canadian society as a result of the NOC regulations. SUMMARY: Despite the rhetoric there has been almost no empiric academic research done into the effect of the regulations. In order to develop rational policy in this area a number of key research questions have been formulated. BioMed Central 2011-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3073891/ /pubmed/21435247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-64 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lexchin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Debate Lexchin, Joel Canada's Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance regulations: balancing the scales or tipping them? |
title | Canada's Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance regulations: balancing the scales or tipping them? |
title_full | Canada's Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance regulations: balancing the scales or tipping them? |
title_fullStr | Canada's Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance regulations: balancing the scales or tipping them? |
title_full_unstemmed | Canada's Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance regulations: balancing the scales or tipping them? |
title_short | Canada's Patented Medicine Notice of Compliance regulations: balancing the scales or tipping them? |
title_sort | canada's patented medicine notice of compliance regulations: balancing the scales or tipping them? |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21435247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-64 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lexchinjoel canadaspatentedmedicinenoticeofcomplianceregulationsbalancingthescalesortippingthem |