Cargando…

Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection

BACKGROUND: Direct smear examination with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is cheap and easy to use, but its low sensitivity is a major drawback, particularly in HIV seropositive patients. As such, new tools for laboratory diagnosis are urgently needed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scherer, Luciene C, Sperhacke, Rosa D, Jarczewski, Carla, Cafrune, Patrícia I, Michelon, Candice T, Rupenthal, Rubia, Ribeiro, Marta Osorio, Netto, Antonio Ruffino, Rossetti, Maria LR, Kritski, Afrânio L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21447159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-11-15
_version_ 1782201671376437248
author Scherer, Luciene C
Sperhacke, Rosa D
Jarczewski, Carla
Cafrune, Patrícia I
Michelon, Candice T
Rupenthal, Rubia
Ribeiro, Marta Osorio
Netto, Antonio Ruffino
Rossetti, Maria LR
Kritski, Afrânio L
author_facet Scherer, Luciene C
Sperhacke, Rosa D
Jarczewski, Carla
Cafrune, Patrícia I
Michelon, Candice T
Rupenthal, Rubia
Ribeiro, Marta Osorio
Netto, Antonio Ruffino
Rossetti, Maria LR
Kritski, Afrânio L
author_sort Scherer, Luciene C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Direct smear examination with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is cheap and easy to use, but its low sensitivity is a major drawback, particularly in HIV seropositive patients. As such, new tools for laboratory diagnosis are urgently needed to improve the case detection rate, especially in regions with a high prevalence of TB and HIV. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of two in house PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction): PCR dot-blot methodology (PCR dot-blot) and PCR agarose gel electrophoresis (PCR-AG) for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) in HIV seropositive and HIV seronegative patients. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted (from May 2003 to May 2004) in a TB/HIV reference hospital. Sputum specimens from 277 PTB suspects were tested by Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) smear, Culture and in house PCR assays (PCR dot-blot and PCR-AG) and their performances evaluated. Positive cultures combined with the definition of clinical pulmonary TB were employed as the gold standard. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of PTB was 46% (128/277); in HIV(+), prevalence was 54.0% (40/74). The sensitivity and specificity of PCR dot-blot were 74% (CI 95%; 66.1%-81.2%) and 85% (CI 95%; 78.8%-90.3%); and of PCR-AG were 43% (CI 95%; 34.5%-51.6%) and 76% (CI 95%; 69.2%-82.8%), respectively. For HIV seropositive and HIV seronegative samples, sensitivities of PCR dot-blot (72% vs 75%; p = 0.46) and PCR-AG (42% vs 43%; p = 0.54) were similar. Among HIV seronegative patients and PTB suspects, ROC analysis presented the following values for the AFB smear (0.837), Culture (0.926), PCR dot-blot (0.801) and PCR-AG (0.599). In HIV seropositive patients, these area values were (0.713), (0.900), (0.789) and (0.595), respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of this study demonstrate that the in house PCR dot blot may be an improvement for ruling out PTB diagnosis in PTB suspects assisted at hospitals with a high prevalence of TB/HIV.
format Text
id pubmed-3073961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30739612011-04-12 Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection Scherer, Luciene C Sperhacke, Rosa D Jarczewski, Carla Cafrune, Patrícia I Michelon, Candice T Rupenthal, Rubia Ribeiro, Marta Osorio Netto, Antonio Ruffino Rossetti, Maria LR Kritski, Afrânio L BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Direct smear examination with Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is cheap and easy to use, but its low sensitivity is a major drawback, particularly in HIV seropositive patients. As such, new tools for laboratory diagnosis are urgently needed to improve the case detection rate, especially in regions with a high prevalence of TB and HIV. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of two in house PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction): PCR dot-blot methodology (PCR dot-blot) and PCR agarose gel electrophoresis (PCR-AG) for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) in HIV seropositive and HIV seronegative patients. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted (from May 2003 to May 2004) in a TB/HIV reference hospital. Sputum specimens from 277 PTB suspects were tested by Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) smear, Culture and in house PCR assays (PCR dot-blot and PCR-AG) and their performances evaluated. Positive cultures combined with the definition of clinical pulmonary TB were employed as the gold standard. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of PTB was 46% (128/277); in HIV(+), prevalence was 54.0% (40/74). The sensitivity and specificity of PCR dot-blot were 74% (CI 95%; 66.1%-81.2%) and 85% (CI 95%; 78.8%-90.3%); and of PCR-AG were 43% (CI 95%; 34.5%-51.6%) and 76% (CI 95%; 69.2%-82.8%), respectively. For HIV seropositive and HIV seronegative samples, sensitivities of PCR dot-blot (72% vs 75%; p = 0.46) and PCR-AG (42% vs 43%; p = 0.54) were similar. Among HIV seronegative patients and PTB suspects, ROC analysis presented the following values for the AFB smear (0.837), Culture (0.926), PCR dot-blot (0.801) and PCR-AG (0.599). In HIV seropositive patients, these area values were (0.713), (0.900), (0.789) and (0.595), respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of this study demonstrate that the in house PCR dot blot may be an improvement for ruling out PTB diagnosis in PTB suspects assisted at hospitals with a high prevalence of TB/HIV. BioMed Central 2011-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3073961/ /pubmed/21447159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-11-15 Text en Copyright ©2011 Scherer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scherer, Luciene C
Sperhacke, Rosa D
Jarczewski, Carla
Cafrune, Patrícia I
Michelon, Candice T
Rupenthal, Rubia
Ribeiro, Marta Osorio
Netto, Antonio Ruffino
Rossetti, Maria LR
Kritski, Afrânio L
Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection
title Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection
title_full Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection
title_fullStr Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection
title_short Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection
title_sort comparison of two laboratory-developed pcr methods for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in brazilian patients with and without hiv infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3073961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21447159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-11-15
work_keys_str_mv AT schererlucienec comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection
AT sperhackerosad comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection
AT jarczewskicarla comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection
AT cafrunepatriciai comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection
AT micheloncandicet comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection
AT rupenthalrubia comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection
AT ribeiromartaosorio comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection
AT nettoantonioruffino comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection
AT rossettimarialr comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection
AT kritskiafraniol comparisonoftwolaboratorydevelopedpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinbrazilianpatientswithandwithouthivinfection