Cargando…
Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding
Increased competition for research funding has led to growth in proposal submissions and lower funding-success rates. An agent-based model of the funding cycle, accounting for variations in program officer and reviewer behaviors, for a range of funding rates, is used to assess the efficiency of diff...
Autores principales: | Roebber, Paul J., Schultz, David M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3075261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018680 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation
por: Gregorius, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
peer review of grant funding – the Australian perspective
por: Cappai, Roberto
Publicado: (2015) -
Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?: An Empirical Investigation Using the Example of the Austrian Science
Fund
por: Mutz, Rüdiger, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The Fund for Widows and Orphans of Medical Officers
Publicado: (1873) -
The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)