Cargando…

Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum

Plant defensins are small cysteine-rich antimicrobial proteins. Their three-dimensional structures are similar in that they consist of an α-helix and three anti-parallel β-strands stabilized by four disulfide bonds. Plant defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 are potent inhibitors of the growth of several fil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagaram, Uma Shankar, Pandurangi, Raghoottama, Kaur, Jagdeep, Smith, Thomas J., Shah, Dilip M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3076432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018550
_version_ 1782201834885087232
author Sagaram, Uma Shankar
Pandurangi, Raghoottama
Kaur, Jagdeep
Smith, Thomas J.
Shah, Dilip M.
author_facet Sagaram, Uma Shankar
Pandurangi, Raghoottama
Kaur, Jagdeep
Smith, Thomas J.
Shah, Dilip M.
author_sort Sagaram, Uma Shankar
collection PubMed
description Plant defensins are small cysteine-rich antimicrobial proteins. Their three-dimensional structures are similar in that they consist of an α-helix and three anti-parallel β-strands stabilized by four disulfide bonds. Plant defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 are potent inhibitors of the growth of several filamentous fungi including Fusarium graminearum. However, they differ markedly in their antifungal properties as well as modes of antifungal action. MsDef1 induces prolific hyperbranching of fungal hyphae, whereas MtDef4 does not. Both defensins contain a highly conserved γ-core motif (GXCX(3–9)C), a hallmark signature present in the disulfide-stabilized antimicrobial peptides, composed of β2 and β3 strands and the interposed loop. The γ-core motifs of these two defensins differ significantly in their primary amino acid sequences and in their net charge. In this study, we have found that the major determinants of the antifungal activity and morphogenicity of these defensins reside in their γ-core motifs. The MsDef1-γ4 variant in which the γ-core motif of MsDef1 was replaced by that of MtDef4 was almost as potent as MtDef4 and also failed to induce hyperbranching of fungal hyphae. Importantly, the γ-core motif of MtDef4 alone was capable of inhibiting fungal growth, but that of MsDef1 was not. The analysis of synthetic γ-core variants of MtDef4 indicated that the cationic and hydrophobic amino acids were important for antifungal activity. Both MsDef1 and MtDef4 induced plasma membrane permeabilization; however, kinetic studies revealed that MtDef4 was more efficient in permeabilizing fungal plasma membrane than MsDef1. Furthermore, the in vitro antifungal activity of MsDef1, MsDef1-γ4, MtDef4 and peptides derived from the γ-core motif of each defensin was not solely dependent on their ability to permeabilize the fungal plasma membrane. The data reported here indicate that the γ-core motif defines the unique antifungal properties of each defensin and may facilitate de novo design of more potent antifungal peptides.
format Text
id pubmed-3076432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30764322011-04-29 Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum Sagaram, Uma Shankar Pandurangi, Raghoottama Kaur, Jagdeep Smith, Thomas J. Shah, Dilip M. PLoS One Research Article Plant defensins are small cysteine-rich antimicrobial proteins. Their three-dimensional structures are similar in that they consist of an α-helix and three anti-parallel β-strands stabilized by four disulfide bonds. Plant defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 are potent inhibitors of the growth of several filamentous fungi including Fusarium graminearum. However, they differ markedly in their antifungal properties as well as modes of antifungal action. MsDef1 induces prolific hyperbranching of fungal hyphae, whereas MtDef4 does not. Both defensins contain a highly conserved γ-core motif (GXCX(3–9)C), a hallmark signature present in the disulfide-stabilized antimicrobial peptides, composed of β2 and β3 strands and the interposed loop. The γ-core motifs of these two defensins differ significantly in their primary amino acid sequences and in their net charge. In this study, we have found that the major determinants of the antifungal activity and morphogenicity of these defensins reside in their γ-core motifs. The MsDef1-γ4 variant in which the γ-core motif of MsDef1 was replaced by that of MtDef4 was almost as potent as MtDef4 and also failed to induce hyperbranching of fungal hyphae. Importantly, the γ-core motif of MtDef4 alone was capable of inhibiting fungal growth, but that of MsDef1 was not. The analysis of synthetic γ-core variants of MtDef4 indicated that the cationic and hydrophobic amino acids were important for antifungal activity. Both MsDef1 and MtDef4 induced plasma membrane permeabilization; however, kinetic studies revealed that MtDef4 was more efficient in permeabilizing fungal plasma membrane than MsDef1. Furthermore, the in vitro antifungal activity of MsDef1, MsDef1-γ4, MtDef4 and peptides derived from the γ-core motif of each defensin was not solely dependent on their ability to permeabilize the fungal plasma membrane. The data reported here indicate that the γ-core motif defines the unique antifungal properties of each defensin and may facilitate de novo design of more potent antifungal peptides. Public Library of Science 2011-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3076432/ /pubmed/21533249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018550 Text en Sagaram et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sagaram, Uma Shankar
Pandurangi, Raghoottama
Kaur, Jagdeep
Smith, Thomas J.
Shah, Dilip M.
Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum
title Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum
title_full Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum
title_fullStr Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum
title_full_unstemmed Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum
title_short Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum
title_sort structure-activity determinants in antifungal plant defensins msdef1 and mtdef4 with different modes of action against fusarium graminearum
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3076432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018550
work_keys_str_mv AT sagaramumashankar structureactivitydeterminantsinantifungalplantdefensinsmsdef1andmtdef4withdifferentmodesofactionagainstfusariumgraminearum
AT pandurangiraghoottama structureactivitydeterminantsinantifungalplantdefensinsmsdef1andmtdef4withdifferentmodesofactionagainstfusariumgraminearum
AT kaurjagdeep structureactivitydeterminantsinantifungalplantdefensinsmsdef1andmtdef4withdifferentmodesofactionagainstfusariumgraminearum
AT smiththomasj structureactivitydeterminantsinantifungalplantdefensinsmsdef1andmtdef4withdifferentmodesofactionagainstfusariumgraminearum
AT shahdilipm structureactivitydeterminantsinantifungalplantdefensinsmsdef1andmtdef4withdifferentmodesofactionagainstfusariumgraminearum