Cargando…

Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses

PURPOSE: This study investigated the strain of implants using a chewing simulator with strain gauges in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses under various dynamic loads. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three implant-supported 5-unit fixed prostheses were fabricated with three different occlusion typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sohn, Byoung-Sup, Heo, Seong-Joo, Koak, Jai-Young, Kim, Seong-Kyun, Lee, Su-Young
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3076566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21503186
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.1.1
_version_ 1782201844159741952
author Sohn, Byoung-Sup
Heo, Seong-Joo
Koak, Jai-Young
Kim, Seong-Kyun
Lee, Su-Young
author_facet Sohn, Byoung-Sup
Heo, Seong-Joo
Koak, Jai-Young
Kim, Seong-Kyun
Lee, Su-Young
author_sort Sohn, Byoung-Sup
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study investigated the strain of implants using a chewing simulator with strain gauges in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses under various dynamic loads. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three implant-supported 5-unit fixed prostheses were fabricated with three different occlusion types (Group I: Canine protected occlusion, Group II: Unilaterally balanced occlusion, Group III: Bilaterally balanced occlusion). Two strain gauges were attached to each implant abutment. The programmed dynamic loads (0 - 300 N) were applied using a chewing simulator (MTS 858 Mini Bionix II systems, MTS systems corp., Minn, USA) and the strains were monitored. The statistical analyses were performed using the paired t-test and the ANOVA. RESULTS: The mean strain values (MSV) for the working sides were 151.83 µε, 176.23 µε, and 131.07 µε for Group I, Group II, and Group III, respectively. There was a significant difference between Group II and Group III (P < .05). Also, the MSV for non-working side were 58.29 µε, 72.64 µε, and 98.93 µε for Group I, Group II, and Group III, respectively. One was significantly different from the others with a 95% confidence interval (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The MSV for the working side of Groups I and II were significantly different from that for the non-working side (Group I: t = 7.58, Group II: t = 6.25). The MSV for the working side of Group II showed significantly larger than that of Group III (P < .01). Lastly, the MSV for the non-working side of Group III showed significantly larger than those of Group I or Group II (P < .01).
format Text
id pubmed-3076566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30765662011-04-18 Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses Sohn, Byoung-Sup Heo, Seong-Joo Koak, Jai-Young Kim, Seong-Kyun Lee, Su-Young J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: This study investigated the strain of implants using a chewing simulator with strain gauges in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses under various dynamic loads. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three implant-supported 5-unit fixed prostheses were fabricated with three different occlusion types (Group I: Canine protected occlusion, Group II: Unilaterally balanced occlusion, Group III: Bilaterally balanced occlusion). Two strain gauges were attached to each implant abutment. The programmed dynamic loads (0 - 300 N) were applied using a chewing simulator (MTS 858 Mini Bionix II systems, MTS systems corp., Minn, USA) and the strains were monitored. The statistical analyses were performed using the paired t-test and the ANOVA. RESULTS: The mean strain values (MSV) for the working sides were 151.83 µε, 176.23 µε, and 131.07 µε for Group I, Group II, and Group III, respectively. There was a significant difference between Group II and Group III (P < .05). Also, the MSV for non-working side were 58.29 µε, 72.64 µε, and 98.93 µε for Group I, Group II, and Group III, respectively. One was significantly different from the others with a 95% confidence interval (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The MSV for the working side of Groups I and II were significantly different from that for the non-working side (Group I: t = 7.58, Group II: t = 6.25). The MSV for the working side of Group II showed significantly larger than that of Group III (P < .01). Lastly, the MSV for the non-working side of Group III showed significantly larger than those of Group I or Group II (P < .01). The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2011-03 2011-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3076566/ /pubmed/21503186 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.1.1 Text en © 2011 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sohn, Byoung-Sup
Heo, Seong-Joo
Koak, Jai-Young
Kim, Seong-Kyun
Lee, Su-Young
Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses
title Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses
title_full Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses
title_fullStr Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses
title_full_unstemmed Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses
title_short Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses
title_sort strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3076566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21503186
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.1.1
work_keys_str_mv AT sohnbyoungsup strainofimplantsdependingonocclusiontypesinmandibularimplantsupportedfixedprostheses
AT heoseongjoo strainofimplantsdependingonocclusiontypesinmandibularimplantsupportedfixedprostheses
AT koakjaiyoung strainofimplantsdependingonocclusiontypesinmandibularimplantsupportedfixedprostheses
AT kimseongkyun strainofimplantsdependingonocclusiontypesinmandibularimplantsupportedfixedprostheses
AT leesuyoung strainofimplantsdependingonocclusiontypesinmandibularimplantsupportedfixedprostheses