Cargando…

Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T

MRI techniques such as quantitative imaging and parallel transmit require precise knowledge of the radio-frequency transmit field ([Image: see text]). Three published methods were optimized for robust [Image: see text] mapping at 3T in the human brain: three-dimensional (3D) actual flip angle imagin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lutti, Antoine, Hutton, Chloe, Finsterbusch, Jürgen, Helms, Gunther, Weiskopf, Nikolaus
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3077518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20572153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22421
_version_ 1782201890639970304
author Lutti, Antoine
Hutton, Chloe
Finsterbusch, Jürgen
Helms, Gunther
Weiskopf, Nikolaus
author_facet Lutti, Antoine
Hutton, Chloe
Finsterbusch, Jürgen
Helms, Gunther
Weiskopf, Nikolaus
author_sort Lutti, Antoine
collection PubMed
description MRI techniques such as quantitative imaging and parallel transmit require precise knowledge of the radio-frequency transmit field ([Image: see text]). Three published methods were optimized for robust [Image: see text] mapping at 3T in the human brain: three-dimensional (3D) actual flip angle imaging (AFI), 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI), and two-dimensional (2D) stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM). We performed a comprehensive comparison of the methods, focusing on artifacts, reproducibility, and accuracy compared to a reference 2D double angle method. For the 3D AFI method, the addition of flow-compensated gradients for diffusion damping reduced the level of physiological artifacts and improved spoiling of transverse coherences. Correction of susceptibility-induced artifacts alleviated image distortions and improved the accuracy of the 3D EPI imaging method. For the 2D STEAM method, averaging over multiple acquisitions reduced the impact of physiological noise and a new calibration method enhanced the accuracy of the [Image: see text] maps. After optimization, all methods yielded low noise [Image: see text] maps (below 2 percentage units), of the nominal flip angle value (p.u.) with a systematic bias less than 5 p.u. units. Full brain coverage was obtained in less than 5 min. The 3D AFI method required minimal postprocessing and showed little sensitivity to off-resonance and physiological effects. The 3D EPI method showed the highest level of reproducibility. The 2D STEAM method was the most time-efficient technique. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
format Text
id pubmed-3077518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30775182011-04-30 Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T Lutti, Antoine Hutton, Chloe Finsterbusch, Jürgen Helms, Gunther Weiskopf, Nikolaus Magn Reson Med Full Paper MRI techniques such as quantitative imaging and parallel transmit require precise knowledge of the radio-frequency transmit field ([Image: see text]). Three published methods were optimized for robust [Image: see text] mapping at 3T in the human brain: three-dimensional (3D) actual flip angle imaging (AFI), 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI), and two-dimensional (2D) stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM). We performed a comprehensive comparison of the methods, focusing on artifacts, reproducibility, and accuracy compared to a reference 2D double angle method. For the 3D AFI method, the addition of flow-compensated gradients for diffusion damping reduced the level of physiological artifacts and improved spoiling of transverse coherences. Correction of susceptibility-induced artifacts alleviated image distortions and improved the accuracy of the 3D EPI imaging method. For the 2D STEAM method, averaging over multiple acquisitions reduced the impact of physiological noise and a new calibration method enhanced the accuracy of the [Image: see text] maps. After optimization, all methods yielded low noise [Image: see text] maps (below 2 percentage units), of the nominal flip angle value (p.u.) with a systematic bias less than 5 p.u. units. Full brain coverage was obtained in less than 5 min. The 3D AFI method required minimal postprocessing and showed little sensitivity to off-resonance and physiological effects. The 3D EPI method showed the highest level of reproducibility. The 2D STEAM method was the most time-efficient technique. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2010-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3077518/ /pubmed/20572153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22421 Text en Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Lutti, Antoine
Hutton, Chloe
Finsterbusch, Jürgen
Helms, Gunther
Weiskopf, Nikolaus
Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T
title Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T
title_full Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T
title_fullStr Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T
title_full_unstemmed Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T
title_short Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T
title_sort optimization and validation of methods for mapping of the radiofrequency transmit field at 3t
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3077518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20572153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22421
work_keys_str_mv AT luttiantoine optimizationandvalidationofmethodsformappingoftheradiofrequencytransmitfieldat3t
AT huttonchloe optimizationandvalidationofmethodsformappingoftheradiofrequencytransmitfieldat3t
AT finsterbuschjurgen optimizationandvalidationofmethodsformappingoftheradiofrequencytransmitfieldat3t
AT helmsgunther optimizationandvalidationofmethodsformappingoftheradiofrequencytransmitfieldat3t
AT weiskopfnikolaus optimizationandvalidationofmethodsformappingoftheradiofrequencytransmitfieldat3t