Cargando…
Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT
PURPOSE: To investigate whether a 3D-modified driven equilibrium Fourier transform (MDEFT)-based acquisition protocol established for brain morphometry also yields reliable information about the cross-sectional spinal cord area (SCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of brain and cervical cord of 10 co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3078516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21031531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22340 |
_version_ | 1782201953971863552 |
---|---|
author | Freund, Patrick AB Dalton, Catherine Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia AM Glensman, Janice Bradbury, David Thompson, Alan J Weiskopf, Nikolaus |
author_facet | Freund, Patrick AB Dalton, Catherine Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia AM Glensman, Janice Bradbury, David Thompson, Alan J Weiskopf, Nikolaus |
author_sort | Freund, Patrick AB |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate whether a 3D-modified driven equilibrium Fourier transform (MDEFT)-based acquisition protocol established for brain morphometry also yields reliable information about the cross-sectional spinal cord area (SCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of brain and cervical cord of 10 controls and eight subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) were acquired with the 3D-MDEFT-based imaging protocol and an 8-channel receive head coil. The new protocol was validated by two observers 1) comparing the SCA measured with the standard acquisition protocol (3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo [MPRAGE] and dedicated spine coil) and the new protocol; and 2) determining the scan–rescan reproducibility of the new protocol. RESULTS: Scan–rescan reproducibility of SCA measurements with the MDEFT approach showed a similar precision for both observers with standard deviation (SD) <4.5 mm(2) and coefficient of variation (CV) ≤5.1%. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a main effect of observer and interaction between observer and scan protocol that could be primarily attributed to a small observer bias for MPRAGE (difference in SCA <2.1 mm(2)). No bias was observed for 3D-MDEFT vs. 3D-MPRAGE. CONCLUSION: The 3D-MDEFT method allows for robust unbiased assessment of SCA in addition to brain morphology. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:1242–1247. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3078516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30785162011-04-30 Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT Freund, Patrick AB Dalton, Catherine Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia AM Glensman, Janice Bradbury, David Thompson, Alan J Weiskopf, Nikolaus J Magn Reson Imaging Technical Note PURPOSE: To investigate whether a 3D-modified driven equilibrium Fourier transform (MDEFT)-based acquisition protocol established for brain morphometry also yields reliable information about the cross-sectional spinal cord area (SCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of brain and cervical cord of 10 controls and eight subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) were acquired with the 3D-MDEFT-based imaging protocol and an 8-channel receive head coil. The new protocol was validated by two observers 1) comparing the SCA measured with the standard acquisition protocol (3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo [MPRAGE] and dedicated spine coil) and the new protocol; and 2) determining the scan–rescan reproducibility of the new protocol. RESULTS: Scan–rescan reproducibility of SCA measurements with the MDEFT approach showed a similar precision for both observers with standard deviation (SD) <4.5 mm(2) and coefficient of variation (CV) ≤5.1%. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a main effect of observer and interaction between observer and scan protocol that could be primarily attributed to a small observer bias for MPRAGE (difference in SCA <2.1 mm(2)). No bias was observed for 3D-MDEFT vs. 3D-MPRAGE. CONCLUSION: The 3D-MDEFT method allows for robust unbiased assessment of SCA in addition to brain morphology. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:1242–1247. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2010-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3078516/ /pubmed/21031531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22340 Text en Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Freund, Patrick AB Dalton, Catherine Wheeler-Kingshott, Claudia AM Glensman, Janice Bradbury, David Thompson, Alan J Weiskopf, Nikolaus Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT |
title | Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT |
title_full | Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT |
title_fullStr | Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT |
title_full_unstemmed | Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT |
title_short | Method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3D-MDEFT |
title_sort | method for simultaneous voxel-based morphometry of the brain and cervical spinal cord area measurements using 3d-mdeft |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3078516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21031531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22340 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freundpatrickab methodforsimultaneousvoxelbasedmorphometryofthebrainandcervicalspinalcordareameasurementsusing3dmdeft AT daltoncatherine methodforsimultaneousvoxelbasedmorphometryofthebrainandcervicalspinalcordareameasurementsusing3dmdeft AT wheelerkingshottclaudiaam methodforsimultaneousvoxelbasedmorphometryofthebrainandcervicalspinalcordareameasurementsusing3dmdeft AT glensmanjanice methodforsimultaneousvoxelbasedmorphometryofthebrainandcervicalspinalcordareameasurementsusing3dmdeft AT bradburydavid methodforsimultaneousvoxelbasedmorphometryofthebrainandcervicalspinalcordareameasurementsusing3dmdeft AT thompsonalanj methodforsimultaneousvoxelbasedmorphometryofthebrainandcervicalspinalcordareameasurementsusing3dmdeft AT weiskopfnikolaus methodforsimultaneousvoxelbasedmorphometryofthebrainandcervicalspinalcordareameasurementsusing3dmdeft |