Cargando…

Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Numerous markers have been evaluated to facilitate the non-invasive diagnostic work-up of mesothelioma. The purpose of this study was to conduct a structured review of the diagnostic performance of non-invasive marker tests for the detection of mesothelioma in patients with suspected mes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Bij, S, Schaake, E, Koffijberg, H, Burgers, J A, de Mol, B A J M, Moons, K G M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3078590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.104
_version_ 1782201959231520768
author van der Bij, S
Schaake, E
Koffijberg, H
Burgers, J A
de Mol, B A J M
Moons, K G M
author_facet van der Bij, S
Schaake, E
Koffijberg, H
Burgers, J A
de Mol, B A J M
Moons, K G M
author_sort van der Bij, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous markers have been evaluated to facilitate the non-invasive diagnostic work-up of mesothelioma. The purpose of this study was to conduct a structured review of the diagnostic performance of non-invasive marker tests for the detection of mesothelioma in patients with suspected mesothelioma. METHODS: Studies on the diagnostic accuracy of serum and cytological markers published till 31 December 2009, available in either PUBMED or Embase, to detect or exclude the presence of mesothelioma were extracted. Study quality was assessed with use of the Quadas criteria. RESULTS: In total, 82 articles were included in this systemic review. Overall, quality of the incorporated studies to address our objective was poor. The most frequently studied immunohistochemical markers for cytological analysis were EMA, Ber-Ep4, CEA, and calretinin. The most frequently investigated serum marker was soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP). The markers CEA, Ber-EP4, and calretinin were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from other malignant diseases. Markers EMA and SMRP were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from non-malignant diseases. No marker performed well in discriminating between mesothelioma and all other diseases. CONCLUSION: Currently, there is only limited evidence to properly assess the value of non-invasive marker tests in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Studies were of limited value to address our objective and results showed considerable unexplained study heterogeneity.
format Text
id pubmed-3078590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30785902012-04-12 Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review van der Bij, S Schaake, E Koffijberg, H Burgers, J A de Mol, B A J M Moons, K G M Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: Numerous markers have been evaluated to facilitate the non-invasive diagnostic work-up of mesothelioma. The purpose of this study was to conduct a structured review of the diagnostic performance of non-invasive marker tests for the detection of mesothelioma in patients with suspected mesothelioma. METHODS: Studies on the diagnostic accuracy of serum and cytological markers published till 31 December 2009, available in either PUBMED or Embase, to detect or exclude the presence of mesothelioma were extracted. Study quality was assessed with use of the Quadas criteria. RESULTS: In total, 82 articles were included in this systemic review. Overall, quality of the incorporated studies to address our objective was poor. The most frequently studied immunohistochemical markers for cytological analysis were EMA, Ber-Ep4, CEA, and calretinin. The most frequently investigated serum marker was soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP). The markers CEA, Ber-EP4, and calretinin were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from other malignant diseases. Markers EMA and SMRP were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from non-malignant diseases. No marker performed well in discriminating between mesothelioma and all other diseases. CONCLUSION: Currently, there is only limited evidence to properly assess the value of non-invasive marker tests in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Studies were of limited value to address our objective and results showed considerable unexplained study heterogeneity. Nature Publishing Group 2011-04-12 2011-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3078590/ /pubmed/21448170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.104 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
van der Bij, S
Schaake, E
Koffijberg, H
Burgers, J A
de Mol, B A J M
Moons, K G M
Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review
title Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review
title_full Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review
title_fullStr Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review
title_short Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review
title_sort markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3078590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.104
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderbijs markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview
AT schaakee markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview
AT koffijbergh markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview
AT burgersja markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview
AT demolbajm markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview
AT moonskgm markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview