Cargando…
Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Numerous markers have been evaluated to facilitate the non-invasive diagnostic work-up of mesothelioma. The purpose of this study was to conduct a structured review of the diagnostic performance of non-invasive marker tests for the detection of mesothelioma in patients with suspected mes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3078590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.104 |
_version_ | 1782201959231520768 |
---|---|
author | van der Bij, S Schaake, E Koffijberg, H Burgers, J A de Mol, B A J M Moons, K G M |
author_facet | van der Bij, S Schaake, E Koffijberg, H Burgers, J A de Mol, B A J M Moons, K G M |
author_sort | van der Bij, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Numerous markers have been evaluated to facilitate the non-invasive diagnostic work-up of mesothelioma. The purpose of this study was to conduct a structured review of the diagnostic performance of non-invasive marker tests for the detection of mesothelioma in patients with suspected mesothelioma. METHODS: Studies on the diagnostic accuracy of serum and cytological markers published till 31 December 2009, available in either PUBMED or Embase, to detect or exclude the presence of mesothelioma were extracted. Study quality was assessed with use of the Quadas criteria. RESULTS: In total, 82 articles were included in this systemic review. Overall, quality of the incorporated studies to address our objective was poor. The most frequently studied immunohistochemical markers for cytological analysis were EMA, Ber-Ep4, CEA, and calretinin. The most frequently investigated serum marker was soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP). The markers CEA, Ber-EP4, and calretinin were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from other malignant diseases. Markers EMA and SMRP were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from non-malignant diseases. No marker performed well in discriminating between mesothelioma and all other diseases. CONCLUSION: Currently, there is only limited evidence to properly assess the value of non-invasive marker tests in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Studies were of limited value to address our objective and results showed considerable unexplained study heterogeneity. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3078590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30785902012-04-12 Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review van der Bij, S Schaake, E Koffijberg, H Burgers, J A de Mol, B A J M Moons, K G M Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: Numerous markers have been evaluated to facilitate the non-invasive diagnostic work-up of mesothelioma. The purpose of this study was to conduct a structured review of the diagnostic performance of non-invasive marker tests for the detection of mesothelioma in patients with suspected mesothelioma. METHODS: Studies on the diagnostic accuracy of serum and cytological markers published till 31 December 2009, available in either PUBMED or Embase, to detect or exclude the presence of mesothelioma were extracted. Study quality was assessed with use of the Quadas criteria. RESULTS: In total, 82 articles were included in this systemic review. Overall, quality of the incorporated studies to address our objective was poor. The most frequently studied immunohistochemical markers for cytological analysis were EMA, Ber-Ep4, CEA, and calretinin. The most frequently investigated serum marker was soluble mesothelin-related protein (SMRP). The markers CEA, Ber-EP4, and calretinin were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from other malignant diseases. Markers EMA and SMRP were most valuable in discriminating mesothelioma from non-malignant diseases. No marker performed well in discriminating between mesothelioma and all other diseases. CONCLUSION: Currently, there is only limited evidence to properly assess the value of non-invasive marker tests in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Studies were of limited value to address our objective and results showed considerable unexplained study heterogeneity. Nature Publishing Group 2011-04-12 2011-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3078590/ /pubmed/21448170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.104 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Molecular Diagnostics van der Bij, S Schaake, E Koffijberg, H Burgers, J A de Mol, B A J M Moons, K G M Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review |
title | Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review |
title_full | Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review |
title_short | Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review |
title_sort | markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review |
topic | Molecular Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3078590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderbijs markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview AT schaakee markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview AT koffijbergh markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview AT burgersja markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview AT demolbajm markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview AT moonskgm markersforthenoninvasivediagnosisofmesotheliomaasystematicreview |