Cargando…

Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis

BACKGROUND: Health officials face particular challenges in communicating with the public about emerging infectious diseases of unknown severity such as the 2009 H1N1(swine 'flu) pandemic (pH1N1). Statements intended to create awareness and convey the seriousness of infectious disease threats ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fogarty, Andrea S, Holland, Kate, Imison, Michelle, Blood, R Warwick, Chapman, Simon, Holding, Simon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21435263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-181
_version_ 1782202035558416384
author Fogarty, Andrea S
Holland, Kate
Imison, Michelle
Blood, R Warwick
Chapman, Simon
Holding, Simon
author_facet Fogarty, Andrea S
Holland, Kate
Imison, Michelle
Blood, R Warwick
Chapman, Simon
Holding, Simon
author_sort Fogarty, Andrea S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health officials face particular challenges in communicating with the public about emerging infectious diseases of unknown severity such as the 2009 H1N1(swine 'flu) pandemic (pH1N1). Statements intended to create awareness and convey the seriousness of infectious disease threats can draw accusations of scare-mongering, while officials can be accused of complacency if such statements are not made. In these communication contexts, news journalists, often reliant on official sources to understand issues are pivotal in selecting and emphasising aspects of official discourse deemed sufficiently newsworthy to present to the public. This paper presents a case-study of news communication regarding the emergence of pH1N1. METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of all television news items about pH1N1. We examined news and current affairs items broadcast on 5 free-to-air Sydney television channels between April 25 2009 (the first report) and October 9 (prior to the vaccine release) for statements about [1] the seriousness of the disease [2] how the public could minimise contagion [3] government responses to emerging information. RESULTS: pH1N1 was the leading health story for eight of 24 weeks and was in the top 5 for 20 weeks. 353 news items were identified, yielding 3086 statements for analysis, with 63.4% related to the seriousness of the situation, 12.9% providing advice for viewers and 23.6% involving assurances from government. Coverage focused on infection/mortality rates, the spread of the virus, the need for public calm, the vulnerability of particular groups, direct and indirect advice for viewers, and government reassurances about effective management. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the reporting of 2009 pH1N1 in Sydney, Australia was generally non-alarmist, while conveying that pH1N1 was potentially serious. Daily infection rate tallies and commentary on changes in the pandemic alert level were seldom contextualised to assist viewers in understanding personal relevance. Suggestions are made about how future reporting of emerging infectious diseases could be enhanced.
format Text
id pubmed-3079644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30796442011-04-20 Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis Fogarty, Andrea S Holland, Kate Imison, Michelle Blood, R Warwick Chapman, Simon Holding, Simon BMC Public Health Correspondence BACKGROUND: Health officials face particular challenges in communicating with the public about emerging infectious diseases of unknown severity such as the 2009 H1N1(swine 'flu) pandemic (pH1N1). Statements intended to create awareness and convey the seriousness of infectious disease threats can draw accusations of scare-mongering, while officials can be accused of complacency if such statements are not made. In these communication contexts, news journalists, often reliant on official sources to understand issues are pivotal in selecting and emphasising aspects of official discourse deemed sufficiently newsworthy to present to the public. This paper presents a case-study of news communication regarding the emergence of pH1N1. METHODS: We conducted a content analysis of all television news items about pH1N1. We examined news and current affairs items broadcast on 5 free-to-air Sydney television channels between April 25 2009 (the first report) and October 9 (prior to the vaccine release) for statements about [1] the seriousness of the disease [2] how the public could minimise contagion [3] government responses to emerging information. RESULTS: pH1N1 was the leading health story for eight of 24 weeks and was in the top 5 for 20 weeks. 353 news items were identified, yielding 3086 statements for analysis, with 63.4% related to the seriousness of the situation, 12.9% providing advice for viewers and 23.6% involving assurances from government. Coverage focused on infection/mortality rates, the spread of the virus, the need for public calm, the vulnerability of particular groups, direct and indirect advice for viewers, and government reassurances about effective management. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the reporting of 2009 pH1N1 in Sydney, Australia was generally non-alarmist, while conveying that pH1N1 was potentially serious. Daily infection rate tallies and commentary on changes in the pandemic alert level were seldom contextualised to assist viewers in understanding personal relevance. Suggestions are made about how future reporting of emerging infectious diseases could be enhanced. BioMed Central 2011-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3079644/ /pubmed/21435263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-181 Text en Copyright ©2011 Fogarty et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Fogarty, Andrea S
Holland, Kate
Imison, Michelle
Blood, R Warwick
Chapman, Simon
Holding, Simon
Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis
title Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis
title_full Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis
title_fullStr Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis
title_full_unstemmed Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis
title_short Communicating uncertainty - how Australian television reported H1N1 risk in 2009: a content analysis
title_sort communicating uncertainty - how australian television reported h1n1 risk in 2009: a content analysis
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21435263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-181
work_keys_str_mv AT fogartyandreas communicatinguncertaintyhowaustraliantelevisionreportedh1n1riskin2009acontentanalysis
AT hollandkate communicatinguncertaintyhowaustraliantelevisionreportedh1n1riskin2009acontentanalysis
AT imisonmichelle communicatinguncertaintyhowaustraliantelevisionreportedh1n1riskin2009acontentanalysis
AT bloodrwarwick communicatinguncertaintyhowaustraliantelevisionreportedh1n1riskin2009acontentanalysis
AT chapmansimon communicatinguncertaintyhowaustraliantelevisionreportedh1n1riskin2009acontentanalysis
AT holdingsimon communicatinguncertaintyhowaustraliantelevisionreportedh1n1riskin2009acontentanalysis