Cargando…
Femoroacetabular impingement and its implications on range of motion: a case report
INTRODUCTION: Femoroacetabular impingement leads to limited hip motion, pain and progressive damage to the labrum. Assessment of the amount and location of excessive ossification can be difficult, and removal does not always lead to pain relief and an increase of function. One of the challenges ahea...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-5-143 |
_version_ | 1782202043027423232 |
---|---|
author | Krekel, Peter R Vochteloo, Anne JH Bloem, Rolf M Nelissen, Rob GHH |
author_facet | Krekel, Peter R Vochteloo, Anne JH Bloem, Rolf M Nelissen, Rob GHH |
author_sort | Krekel, Peter R |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Femoroacetabular impingement leads to limited hip motion, pain and progressive damage to the labrum. Assessment of the amount and location of excessive ossification can be difficult, and removal does not always lead to pain relief and an increase of function. One of the challenges ahead is to discover why certain cases have poor outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: The technical and clinical results of two consecutive arthroscopic shavings of an osseous cam protrusion are described in our patient, a 50-year-old Caucasian man with complaints of femoroacetabular impingement. At 12 weeks after the first arthroscopic shaving, our patient still experienced pain. Using a range of motion simulation system based on computed tomography images the kinematics of his hip joint were analyzed. Bone that limited range of motion was removed in a second arthroscopic procedure. At six months post-operatively our patient is almost pain free and has regained a range of motion to a functional level. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the relevance of range of motion simulation when the outcome of primary arthroscopic management is unsatisfactory. Such simulations may aid clinicians in determining the gain of a second operation. This claim is supported by the correlation of the simulations with clinical outcome, as shown in this case report. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3079675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30796752011-04-20 Femoroacetabular impingement and its implications on range of motion: a case report Krekel, Peter R Vochteloo, Anne JH Bloem, Rolf M Nelissen, Rob GHH J Med Case Reports Case Report INTRODUCTION: Femoroacetabular impingement leads to limited hip motion, pain and progressive damage to the labrum. Assessment of the amount and location of excessive ossification can be difficult, and removal does not always lead to pain relief and an increase of function. One of the challenges ahead is to discover why certain cases have poor outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: The technical and clinical results of two consecutive arthroscopic shavings of an osseous cam protrusion are described in our patient, a 50-year-old Caucasian man with complaints of femoroacetabular impingement. At 12 weeks after the first arthroscopic shaving, our patient still experienced pain. Using a range of motion simulation system based on computed tomography images the kinematics of his hip joint were analyzed. Bone that limited range of motion was removed in a second arthroscopic procedure. At six months post-operatively our patient is almost pain free and has regained a range of motion to a functional level. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the relevance of range of motion simulation when the outcome of primary arthroscopic management is unsatisfactory. Such simulations may aid clinicians in determining the gain of a second operation. This claim is supported by the correlation of the simulations with clinical outcome, as shown in this case report. BioMed Central 2011-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3079675/ /pubmed/21477363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-5-143 Text en Copyright ©2011 Krekel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Krekel, Peter R Vochteloo, Anne JH Bloem, Rolf M Nelissen, Rob GHH Femoroacetabular impingement and its implications on range of motion: a case report |
title | Femoroacetabular impingement and its implications on range of motion: a case report |
title_full | Femoroacetabular impingement and its implications on range of motion: a case report |
title_fullStr | Femoroacetabular impingement and its implications on range of motion: a case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Femoroacetabular impingement and its implications on range of motion: a case report |
title_short | Femoroacetabular impingement and its implications on range of motion: a case report |
title_sort | femoroacetabular impingement and its implications on range of motion: a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-5-143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krekelpeterr femoroacetabularimpingementanditsimplicationsonrangeofmotionacasereport AT vochtelooannejh femoroacetabularimpingementanditsimplicationsonrangeofmotionacasereport AT bloemrolfm femoroacetabularimpingementanditsimplicationsonrangeofmotionacasereport AT nelissenrobghh femoroacetabularimpingementanditsimplicationsonrangeofmotionacasereport |