Cargando…
What counts as reliable evidence for public health policy: the case of circumcision for preventing HIV infection
BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing controversy over the relative merits of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized observational studies in assessing efficacy and guiding policy. In this paper we examine male circumcision to prevent HIV infection as a case study that can illuminate the a...
Autores principales: | Lie, Reidar K, Miller, Franklin G |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21453535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-34 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?
por: Morris, Brian J, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Comparative effectiveness research: what to do when experts disagree about risks
por: Lie, Reidar K., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Health, human rights and mobilization of resources for health
por: Lie, Reidar K
Publicado: (2004) -
Toward a policy ecology of implementation of evidence-based practices in public mental health settings
por: Raghavan, Ramesh, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Obligations of low income countries in ensuring equity in global health financing
por: Barugahare, John, et al.
Publicado: (2015)