Cargando…

Pattern Classification of Working Memory Networks Reveals Differential Effects of Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, and Placebo in Healthy Volunteers

Stimulant and non-stimulant drugs can reduce symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The stimulant drug methylphenidate (MPH) and the non-stimulant drug atomoxetine (ATX) are both widely used for ADHD treatment, but their differential effects on human brain function remain uncle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marquand, Andre F, De Simoni, Sara, O'Daly, Owen G, Williams, Steven CR, Mourão-Miranda, Janaina, Mehta, Mitul A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21346736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.9
_version_ 1782202066903498752
author Marquand, Andre F
De Simoni, Sara
O'Daly, Owen G
Williams, Steven CR
Mourão-Miranda, Janaina
Mehta, Mitul A
author_facet Marquand, Andre F
De Simoni, Sara
O'Daly, Owen G
Williams, Steven CR
Mourão-Miranda, Janaina
Mehta, Mitul A
author_sort Marquand, Andre F
collection PubMed
description Stimulant and non-stimulant drugs can reduce symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The stimulant drug methylphenidate (MPH) and the non-stimulant drug atomoxetine (ATX) are both widely used for ADHD treatment, but their differential effects on human brain function remain unclear. We combined event-related fMRI with multivariate pattern recognition to characterize the effects of MPH and ATX in healthy volunteers performing a rewarded working memory (WM) task. The effects of MPH and ATX on WM were strongly dependent on their behavioral context. During non-rewarded trials, only MPH could be discriminated from placebo (PLC), with MPH producing a similar activation pattern to reward. During rewarded trials both drugs produced the opposite effect to reward, that is, attenuating WM networks and enhancing task-related deactivations (TRDs) in regions consistent with the default mode network (DMN). The drugs could be directly discriminated during the delay component of rewarded trials: MPH produced greater activity in WM networks and ATX produced greater activity in the DMN. Our data provide evidence that: (1) MPH and ATX have prominent effects during rewarded WM in task-activated and -deactivated networks; (2) during the delay component of rewarded trials, MPH and ATX have opposing effects on activated and deactivated networks: MPH enhances TRDs more than ATX, whereas ATX attenuates WM networks more than MPH; and (3) MPH mimics reward during encoding. Thus, interactions between drug effects and motivational state are crucial in defining the effects of MPH and ATX.
format Text
id pubmed-3079849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30798492011-05-11 Pattern Classification of Working Memory Networks Reveals Differential Effects of Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, and Placebo in Healthy Volunteers Marquand, Andre F De Simoni, Sara O'Daly, Owen G Williams, Steven CR Mourão-Miranda, Janaina Mehta, Mitul A Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article Stimulant and non-stimulant drugs can reduce symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The stimulant drug methylphenidate (MPH) and the non-stimulant drug atomoxetine (ATX) are both widely used for ADHD treatment, but their differential effects on human brain function remain unclear. We combined event-related fMRI with multivariate pattern recognition to characterize the effects of MPH and ATX in healthy volunteers performing a rewarded working memory (WM) task. The effects of MPH and ATX on WM were strongly dependent on their behavioral context. During non-rewarded trials, only MPH could be discriminated from placebo (PLC), with MPH producing a similar activation pattern to reward. During rewarded trials both drugs produced the opposite effect to reward, that is, attenuating WM networks and enhancing task-related deactivations (TRDs) in regions consistent with the default mode network (DMN). The drugs could be directly discriminated during the delay component of rewarded trials: MPH produced greater activity in WM networks and ATX produced greater activity in the DMN. Our data provide evidence that: (1) MPH and ATX have prominent effects during rewarded WM in task-activated and -deactivated networks; (2) during the delay component of rewarded trials, MPH and ATX have opposing effects on activated and deactivated networks: MPH enhances TRDs more than ATX, whereas ATX attenuates WM networks more than MPH; and (3) MPH mimics reward during encoding. Thus, interactions between drug effects and motivational state are crucial in defining the effects of MPH and ATX. Nature Publishing Group 2011-05 2011-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3079849/ /pubmed/21346736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.9 Text en Copyright © 2011 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Marquand, Andre F
De Simoni, Sara
O'Daly, Owen G
Williams, Steven CR
Mourão-Miranda, Janaina
Mehta, Mitul A
Pattern Classification of Working Memory Networks Reveals Differential Effects of Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, and Placebo in Healthy Volunteers
title Pattern Classification of Working Memory Networks Reveals Differential Effects of Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, and Placebo in Healthy Volunteers
title_full Pattern Classification of Working Memory Networks Reveals Differential Effects of Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, and Placebo in Healthy Volunteers
title_fullStr Pattern Classification of Working Memory Networks Reveals Differential Effects of Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, and Placebo in Healthy Volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Pattern Classification of Working Memory Networks Reveals Differential Effects of Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, and Placebo in Healthy Volunteers
title_short Pattern Classification of Working Memory Networks Reveals Differential Effects of Methylphenidate, Atomoxetine, and Placebo in Healthy Volunteers
title_sort pattern classification of working memory networks reveals differential effects of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and placebo in healthy volunteers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3079849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21346736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.9
work_keys_str_mv AT marquandandref patternclassificationofworkingmemorynetworksrevealsdifferentialeffectsofmethylphenidateatomoxetineandplaceboinhealthyvolunteers
AT desimonisara patternclassificationofworkingmemorynetworksrevealsdifferentialeffectsofmethylphenidateatomoxetineandplaceboinhealthyvolunteers
AT odalyoweng patternclassificationofworkingmemorynetworksrevealsdifferentialeffectsofmethylphenidateatomoxetineandplaceboinhealthyvolunteers
AT williamsstevencr patternclassificationofworkingmemorynetworksrevealsdifferentialeffectsofmethylphenidateatomoxetineandplaceboinhealthyvolunteers
AT mouraomirandajanaina patternclassificationofworkingmemorynetworksrevealsdifferentialeffectsofmethylphenidateatomoxetineandplaceboinhealthyvolunteers
AT mehtamitula patternclassificationofworkingmemorynetworksrevealsdifferentialeffectsofmethylphenidateatomoxetineandplaceboinhealthyvolunteers