Cargando…

Commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast CT

Enough literature now exists such that doing a non-contrast abdominal or chest computed tomography (CT) scan for suspected mass lesions in children borders on malpractice. Although there is great uncertainty regarding estimated radiation doses and long-term cancer risks in childhood, there is no dou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McHugh, Kieran, Disini, Luisa
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-Med 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21362585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0003
_version_ 1782202080039010304
author McHugh, Kieran
Disini, Luisa
author_facet McHugh, Kieran
Disini, Luisa
author_sort McHugh, Kieran
collection PubMed
description Enough literature now exists such that doing a non-contrast abdominal or chest computed tomography (CT) scan for suspected mass lesions in children borders on malpractice. Although there is great uncertainty regarding estimated radiation doses and long-term cancer risks in childhood, there is no doubt that an entirely unnecessary CT study does more harm than good. When a chest or abdominal mass is suspected in a child, only a post-intravenous contrast enhanced CT examination is needed, and a prior non-enhanced CT run exposes the child to unnecessary radiation.
format Text
id pubmed-3080127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher e-Med
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30801272012-05-24 Commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast CT McHugh, Kieran Disini, Luisa Cancer Imaging Editorial Enough literature now exists such that doing a non-contrast abdominal or chest computed tomography (CT) scan for suspected mass lesions in children borders on malpractice. Although there is great uncertainty regarding estimated radiation doses and long-term cancer risks in childhood, there is no doubt that an entirely unnecessary CT study does more harm than good. When a chest or abdominal mass is suspected in a child, only a post-intravenous contrast enhanced CT examination is needed, and a prior non-enhanced CT run exposes the child to unnecessary radiation. e-Med 2011-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3080127/ /pubmed/21362585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0003 Text en © 2011 International Cancer Imaging Society
spellingShingle Editorial
McHugh, Kieran
Disini, Luisa
Commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast CT
title Commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast CT
title_full Commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast CT
title_fullStr Commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast CT
title_full_unstemmed Commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast CT
title_short Commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast CT
title_sort commentary: for the children’s sake, avoid non-contrast ct
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21362585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0003
work_keys_str_mv AT mchughkieran commentaryforthechildrenssakeavoidnoncontrastct
AT disiniluisa commentaryforthechildrenssakeavoidnoncontrastct