Cargando…

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health and financial burden. VTE impacts health outcomes in surgical and non-surgical patients. VTE prophylaxis is underutilized, particularly amongst high risk medical patients. We conducted a multicentre clinical audit to determine the extent to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibbs, Harry, Fletcher, John, Blombery, Peter, Collins, Renea, Wheatley, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21466681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-9-7
_version_ 1782202086953320448
author Gibbs, Harry
Fletcher, John
Blombery, Peter
Collins, Renea
Wheatley, David
author_facet Gibbs, Harry
Fletcher, John
Blombery, Peter
Collins, Renea
Wheatley, David
author_sort Gibbs, Harry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health and financial burden. VTE impacts health outcomes in surgical and non-surgical patients. VTE prophylaxis is underutilized, particularly amongst high risk medical patients. We conducted a multicentre clinical audit to determine the extent to which appropriate VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients could be improved via implementation of a multifaceted nurse facilitated educational program. METHODS: This multicentre clinical audit of 15 Australian hospitals was conducted in 2007-208. The program incorporated a baseline audit to determine the proportion of patients receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis according to best practice recommendations issued by the Australian and New Zealand Working Party on the Management and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (ANZ-WP recommendations), followed by a 4-month education intervention program and a post intervention audit. The primary endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients being appropriately managed based on their risk profile between the two audits. RESULTS: A total of 8774 patients (audit 1; 4399 and audit 2; 4375) were included in the study, most (82.2% audit 1; and 81.0% audit 2) were high risk based on ANZ-WP recommendations. At baseline 37.9% of high risk patients were receiving appropriate thromboprophylaxis. This increased to 54.1% in the post intervention audit (absolute improvement 16%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.7%, 20.5%). As a result of the nurse educator program, the likelihood of high risk patients being treated according to ANZ-WP recommendations increased significantly (OR 1.96; 1.62, 2.37). CONCLUSION: Utilization of VTE prophylaxis amongst hospitalized medical patients can be significantly improved by implementation of a multifaceted educational program coordinated by a dedicated nurse practitioner.
format Text
id pubmed-3080276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30802762011-04-21 Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit Gibbs, Harry Fletcher, John Blombery, Peter Collins, Renea Wheatley, David Thromb J Original Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health and financial burden. VTE impacts health outcomes in surgical and non-surgical patients. VTE prophylaxis is underutilized, particularly amongst high risk medical patients. We conducted a multicentre clinical audit to determine the extent to which appropriate VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients could be improved via implementation of a multifaceted nurse facilitated educational program. METHODS: This multicentre clinical audit of 15 Australian hospitals was conducted in 2007-208. The program incorporated a baseline audit to determine the proportion of patients receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis according to best practice recommendations issued by the Australian and New Zealand Working Party on the Management and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (ANZ-WP recommendations), followed by a 4-month education intervention program and a post intervention audit. The primary endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients being appropriately managed based on their risk profile between the two audits. RESULTS: A total of 8774 patients (audit 1; 4399 and audit 2; 4375) were included in the study, most (82.2% audit 1; and 81.0% audit 2) were high risk based on ANZ-WP recommendations. At baseline 37.9% of high risk patients were receiving appropriate thromboprophylaxis. This increased to 54.1% in the post intervention audit (absolute improvement 16%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.7%, 20.5%). As a result of the nurse educator program, the likelihood of high risk patients being treated according to ANZ-WP recommendations increased significantly (OR 1.96; 1.62, 2.37). CONCLUSION: Utilization of VTE prophylaxis amongst hospitalized medical patients can be significantly improved by implementation of a multifaceted educational program coordinated by a dedicated nurse practitioner. BioMed Central 2011-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3080276/ /pubmed/21466681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-9-7 Text en Copyright ©2011 Gibbs et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Investigation
Gibbs, Harry
Fletcher, John
Blombery, Peter
Collins, Renea
Wheatley, David
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit
title Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit
title_full Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit
title_fullStr Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit
title_full_unstemmed Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit
title_short Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit
title_sort venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline implementation is improved by nurse directed feedback and audit
topic Original Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21466681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-9-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbsharry venousthromboembolismprophylaxisguidelineimplementationisimprovedbynursedirectedfeedbackandaudit
AT fletcherjohn venousthromboembolismprophylaxisguidelineimplementationisimprovedbynursedirectedfeedbackandaudit
AT blomberypeter venousthromboembolismprophylaxisguidelineimplementationisimprovedbynursedirectedfeedbackandaudit
AT collinsrenea venousthromboembolismprophylaxisguidelineimplementationisimprovedbynursedirectedfeedbackandaudit
AT wheatleydavid venousthromboembolismprophylaxisguidelineimplementationisimprovedbynursedirectedfeedbackandaudit