Cargando…

Treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice

BACKGROUND: Foot problems in general and forefoot problems in particular can lead to a decrease in mobility and a higher risk of falling. Forefoot problems increase with age and are more common in women than in men. Around 20% of people over 65 suffer from non-traumatic foot problems and 60% of thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Zwaard, Babette C, Elders, Petra JM, Knol, Dirk L, Gorter, Kees J, Peeraer, Louis, van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM, van der Horst, Henriëtte E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21453476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-11
_version_ 1782202090003628032
author van der Zwaard, Babette C
Elders, Petra JM
Knol, Dirk L
Gorter, Kees J
Peeraer, Louis
van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM
van der Horst, Henriëtte E
author_facet van der Zwaard, Babette C
Elders, Petra JM
Knol, Dirk L
Gorter, Kees J
Peeraer, Louis
van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM
van der Horst, Henriëtte E
author_sort van der Zwaard, Babette C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Foot problems in general and forefoot problems in particular can lead to a decrease in mobility and a higher risk of falling. Forefoot problems increase with age and are more common in women than in men. Around 20% of people over 65 suffer from non-traumatic foot problems and 60% of these problems are localised in the forefoot. Little is known about the best way to treat forefoot problems in older people. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of two common modes of treatment in the Netherlands: shoe advice and podiatric treatment. This paper describes the design of this study. METHODS: The study is designed as a pragmatic randomised clinical trial (RCT) with 2 parallel intervention groups. People aged 50 years and over who have visited their general practitioner (GP) with non traumatic pain in the forefoot in the preceding year and those who will visit their GP during the recruitment period with a similar complaint will be recruited for this study. Participants must be able to walk unaided for 7 metres and be able to fill in questionnaires. Exclusion criteria are: rheumatoid arthritis, neuropathy of the foot or pain caused by skin problems (e.g. warts, eczema). Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be assessed by a screening questionnaire and baseline assessment. Those consenting to participation will be randomly assigned to either a group receiving a standardised shoe advice leaflet (n = 100) or a group receiving podiatric treatment (n = 100). Primary outcomes will be the severity of forefoot pain (0-10 on a numerical rating scale) and foot function (Foot Function 5-pts Index and Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index). Treatment adherence, social participation and quality of life will be the secondary outcomes. All outcomes will be obtained through self-administered questionnaires at the start of the study and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Data will be analysed according to the "intention-to-treat" principle using multilevel level analysis. DISCUSSION: Strength of this study is the comparison between two common primary care treatments for forefoot problems, ensuring a high external validity of this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2212
format Text
id pubmed-3080289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30802892011-04-21 Treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice van der Zwaard, Babette C Elders, Petra JM Knol, Dirk L Gorter, Kees J Peeraer, Louis van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM van der Horst, Henriëtte E J Foot Ankle Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Foot problems in general and forefoot problems in particular can lead to a decrease in mobility and a higher risk of falling. Forefoot problems increase with age and are more common in women than in men. Around 20% of people over 65 suffer from non-traumatic foot problems and 60% of these problems are localised in the forefoot. Little is known about the best way to treat forefoot problems in older people. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of two common modes of treatment in the Netherlands: shoe advice and podiatric treatment. This paper describes the design of this study. METHODS: The study is designed as a pragmatic randomised clinical trial (RCT) with 2 parallel intervention groups. People aged 50 years and over who have visited their general practitioner (GP) with non traumatic pain in the forefoot in the preceding year and those who will visit their GP during the recruitment period with a similar complaint will be recruited for this study. Participants must be able to walk unaided for 7 metres and be able to fill in questionnaires. Exclusion criteria are: rheumatoid arthritis, neuropathy of the foot or pain caused by skin problems (e.g. warts, eczema). Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be assessed by a screening questionnaire and baseline assessment. Those consenting to participation will be randomly assigned to either a group receiving a standardised shoe advice leaflet (n = 100) or a group receiving podiatric treatment (n = 100). Primary outcomes will be the severity of forefoot pain (0-10 on a numerical rating scale) and foot function (Foot Function 5-pts Index and Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index). Treatment adherence, social participation and quality of life will be the secondary outcomes. All outcomes will be obtained through self-administered questionnaires at the start of the study and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Data will be analysed according to the "intention-to-treat" principle using multilevel level analysis. DISCUSSION: Strength of this study is the comparison between two common primary care treatments for forefoot problems, ensuring a high external validity of this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2212 BioMed Central 2011-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3080289/ /pubmed/21453476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-11 Text en Copyright ©2011 van der Zwaard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van der Zwaard, Babette C
Elders, Petra JM
Knol, Dirk L
Gorter, Kees J
Peeraer, Louis
van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM
van der Horst, Henriëtte E
Treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice
title Treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice
title_full Treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice
title_fullStr Treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice
title_short Treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice
title_sort treatment of forefoot problems in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing podiatric treatment to standardised shoe advice
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21453476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-11
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderzwaardbabettec treatmentofforefootproblemsinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingpodiatrictreatmenttostandardisedshoeadvice
AT elderspetrajm treatmentofforefootproblemsinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingpodiatrictreatmenttostandardisedshoeadvice
AT knoldirkl treatmentofforefootproblemsinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingpodiatrictreatmenttostandardisedshoeadvice
AT gorterkeesj treatmentofforefootproblemsinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingpodiatrictreatmenttostandardisedshoeadvice
AT peeraerlouis treatmentofforefootproblemsinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingpodiatrictreatmenttostandardisedshoeadvice
AT vanderwindtdanielleawm treatmentofforefootproblemsinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingpodiatrictreatmenttostandardisedshoeadvice
AT vanderhorsthenriettee treatmentofforefootproblemsinolderpeoplestudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicaltrialcomparingpodiatrictreatmenttostandardisedshoeadvice