Cargando…

Comparative experimental re-evaluation of the two implanting methods of silicone gel testicular prostheses in beagle dogs

BACKGROUND: Testicular prosthesis has been applied clinically for decades, and implantation of testis prosthesis under the tunica albuginea has been considered to be the standard method in the most of the reports. However, postoperative scrotal appearance, the mobilization and the palpitation of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Tong-li, Chen, Peng
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21457571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-99
_version_ 1782202095828467712
author Hao, Tong-li
Chen, Peng
author_facet Hao, Tong-li
Chen, Peng
author_sort Hao, Tong-li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Testicular prosthesis has been applied clinically for decades, and implantation of testis prosthesis under the tunica albuginea has been considered to be the standard method in the most of the reports. However, postoperative scrotal appearance, the mobilization and the palpitation of the prosthesis are not always satisfactory to all the patients. Modifications in surgical techniques might be necessary to bring improvements to the clinical outcomes in testicular prosthesis implantation. FINDINGS: In a group of 9 beagle dogs in this study, an orchiectomy succeeded with a testicular prosthesis implantation under the tunica vaginalis, and a complete mechanical denudation of the testicular parenchyma succeeded with an implantation under the tunica albuginea were performed, respectively. Histopathological evaluations of the scrotal tissues and the implants, which were made at the end of the follow-up, showed that all the tested animals lived uneventful lives during the follow-up period, and no rejections or infections were found. Prostheses implanted under the tunica vaginalis showed a more satisfying mobilization and palpation than those implanted under the tunica albuginea. Chronic inflammation in the para-prosthesis tissues with vascular proliferation and fibrinogenesis were more common in the "under tunica albuginea" group than that in the "under tunica vaginalis" group, although differences in fibrinogenesis between the two groups were found to be statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative study, we have re-evaluated the two most popular implantation methods of testicular prosthesis, the "under the tunica albuginea" and the "under the tunica vaginalis" pathways, in animal models. We found that the testicular prosthesis were all well tolerated, but the prosthesis implanted under the tunica vaginalis showed a more satisfying result concerning appearance, palpability, and histopathological findings than that of the "under the tunica albuginea" group. The "under the tunica vaginalis" method might become a more practical method for future testicular prosthesis implantation.
format Text
id pubmed-3080313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30803132011-04-21 Comparative experimental re-evaluation of the two implanting methods of silicone gel testicular prostheses in beagle dogs Hao, Tong-li Chen, Peng BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Testicular prosthesis has been applied clinically for decades, and implantation of testis prosthesis under the tunica albuginea has been considered to be the standard method in the most of the reports. However, postoperative scrotal appearance, the mobilization and the palpitation of the prosthesis are not always satisfactory to all the patients. Modifications in surgical techniques might be necessary to bring improvements to the clinical outcomes in testicular prosthesis implantation. FINDINGS: In a group of 9 beagle dogs in this study, an orchiectomy succeeded with a testicular prosthesis implantation under the tunica vaginalis, and a complete mechanical denudation of the testicular parenchyma succeeded with an implantation under the tunica albuginea were performed, respectively. Histopathological evaluations of the scrotal tissues and the implants, which were made at the end of the follow-up, showed that all the tested animals lived uneventful lives during the follow-up period, and no rejections or infections were found. Prostheses implanted under the tunica vaginalis showed a more satisfying mobilization and palpation than those implanted under the tunica albuginea. Chronic inflammation in the para-prosthesis tissues with vascular proliferation and fibrinogenesis were more common in the "under tunica albuginea" group than that in the "under tunica vaginalis" group, although differences in fibrinogenesis between the two groups were found to be statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative study, we have re-evaluated the two most popular implantation methods of testicular prosthesis, the "under the tunica albuginea" and the "under the tunica vaginalis" pathways, in animal models. We found that the testicular prosthesis were all well tolerated, but the prosthesis implanted under the tunica vaginalis showed a more satisfying result concerning appearance, palpability, and histopathological findings than that of the "under the tunica albuginea" group. The "under the tunica vaginalis" method might become a more practical method for future testicular prosthesis implantation. BioMed Central 2011-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3080313/ /pubmed/21457571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-99 Text en Copyright ©2011 Hao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Hao, Tong-li
Chen, Peng
Comparative experimental re-evaluation of the two implanting methods of silicone gel testicular prostheses in beagle dogs
title Comparative experimental re-evaluation of the two implanting methods of silicone gel testicular prostheses in beagle dogs
title_full Comparative experimental re-evaluation of the two implanting methods of silicone gel testicular prostheses in beagle dogs
title_fullStr Comparative experimental re-evaluation of the two implanting methods of silicone gel testicular prostheses in beagle dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative experimental re-evaluation of the two implanting methods of silicone gel testicular prostheses in beagle dogs
title_short Comparative experimental re-evaluation of the two implanting methods of silicone gel testicular prostheses in beagle dogs
title_sort comparative experimental re-evaluation of the two implanting methods of silicone gel testicular prostheses in beagle dogs
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21457571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-99
work_keys_str_mv AT haotongli comparativeexperimentalreevaluationofthetwoimplantingmethodsofsiliconegeltesticularprosthesesinbeagledogs
AT chenpeng comparativeexperimentalreevaluationofthetwoimplantingmethodsofsiliconegeltesticularprosthesesinbeagledogs