Cargando…

A randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour

BACKGROUND: Almost one third of women suffer continuous lower back pain during labour. Evidence from three systematic reviews demonstrates that sterile water injections (SWI) provide statistically and clinically significant pain relief in women experiencing continuous lower back pain during labour....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Nigel, Coxeter, Peter, Beckmann, Michael, Webster, Joan, Wright, Vanessa, Smith, Tric, Kildea, Sue
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21429223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-21
_version_ 1782202104648040448
author Lee, Nigel
Coxeter, Peter
Beckmann, Michael
Webster, Joan
Wright, Vanessa
Smith, Tric
Kildea, Sue
author_facet Lee, Nigel
Coxeter, Peter
Beckmann, Michael
Webster, Joan
Wright, Vanessa
Smith, Tric
Kildea, Sue
author_sort Lee, Nigel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Almost one third of women suffer continuous lower back pain during labour. Evidence from three systematic reviews demonstrates that sterile water injections (SWI) provide statistically and clinically significant pain relief in women experiencing continuous lower back pain during labour. The most effective technique to administer SWI is yet to be determined. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine if the single injection SWI technique is no less effective than the routinely used four injection SWI method in reducing continuous lower back pain during labour. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial protocol was developed in consultation with an interdisciplinary team of clinical researchers. We aim to recruit 319 women presenting at term, seeking analgesia for continuous severe lower back pain during labour. Participants will be recruited from two major maternity hospitals in Australia. Randomised participants are allocated to receive a four or single intradermal needle SWI technique. The primary outcome is the change in self-reported pain measured by visual analogue scale at baseline and thirty minutes post intervention. Secondary outcomes include VAS change scores at 10, 60, 90 and 120 min, analgesia use, mode of birth and maternal satisfaction. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Sample size was calculated to achieve 90% power at an alpha of 0.025 to detect a non-inferiority margin of ≤ 1 cm on the VAS, using a one-sided, two-sample t-test. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics will be analysed for comparability between groups. Differences in primary (VAS pain score) and secondary outcomes between groups will be analysed by intention to treat and per protocol analysis using Student's t-test and ANOVA. CONCLUSION: This study will determine if a single intradermal SWI technique is no less effective than the routinely used four injection technique for lower back pain during labour. The findings will allow midwives to offer women requesting SWI during labour an evidence-based alternative technique more easily administered by staff and accepted by labouring women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12609000964213
format Text
id pubmed-3080350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30803502011-04-21 A randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour Lee, Nigel Coxeter, Peter Beckmann, Michael Webster, Joan Wright, Vanessa Smith, Tric Kildea, Sue BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Almost one third of women suffer continuous lower back pain during labour. Evidence from three systematic reviews demonstrates that sterile water injections (SWI) provide statistically and clinically significant pain relief in women experiencing continuous lower back pain during labour. The most effective technique to administer SWI is yet to be determined. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine if the single injection SWI technique is no less effective than the routinely used four injection SWI method in reducing continuous lower back pain during labour. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial protocol was developed in consultation with an interdisciplinary team of clinical researchers. We aim to recruit 319 women presenting at term, seeking analgesia for continuous severe lower back pain during labour. Participants will be recruited from two major maternity hospitals in Australia. Randomised participants are allocated to receive a four or single intradermal needle SWI technique. The primary outcome is the change in self-reported pain measured by visual analogue scale at baseline and thirty minutes post intervention. Secondary outcomes include VAS change scores at 10, 60, 90 and 120 min, analgesia use, mode of birth and maternal satisfaction. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Sample size was calculated to achieve 90% power at an alpha of 0.025 to detect a non-inferiority margin of ≤ 1 cm on the VAS, using a one-sided, two-sample t-test. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics will be analysed for comparability between groups. Differences in primary (VAS pain score) and secondary outcomes between groups will be analysed by intention to treat and per protocol analysis using Student's t-test and ANOVA. CONCLUSION: This study will determine if a single intradermal SWI technique is no less effective than the routinely used four injection technique for lower back pain during labour. The findings will allow midwives to offer women requesting SWI during labour an evidence-based alternative technique more easily administered by staff and accepted by labouring women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12609000964213 BioMed Central 2011-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3080350/ /pubmed/21429223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-21 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lee, Nigel
Coxeter, Peter
Beckmann, Michael
Webster, Joan
Wright, Vanessa
Smith, Tric
Kildea, Sue
A randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour
title A randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour
title_full A randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour
title_fullStr A randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour
title_full_unstemmed A randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour
title_short A randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour
title_sort randomised non-inferiority controlled trial of a single versus a four intradermal sterile water injection technique for relief of continuous lower back pain during labour
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21429223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-21
work_keys_str_mv AT leenigel arandomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT coxeterpeter arandomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT beckmannmichael arandomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT websterjoan arandomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT wrightvanessa arandomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT smithtric arandomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT kildeasue arandomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT leenigel randomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT coxeterpeter randomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT beckmannmichael randomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT websterjoan randomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT wrightvanessa randomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT smithtric randomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour
AT kildeasue randomisednoninferioritycontrolledtrialofasingleversusafourintradermalsterilewaterinjectiontechniqueforreliefofcontinuouslowerbackpainduringlabour