Cargando…

Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature

BACKGROUND: A review of the barriers to mosquito net use in malaria-endemic countries has yet to be presented in the published literature despite considerable research interest in this area. This paper partly addresses this gap by reviewing one component of the evidence base; namely, published resea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pulford, Justin, Hetzel, Manuel W, Bryant, Miranda, Siba, Peter M, Mueller, Ivo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-83
_version_ 1782202105119899648
author Pulford, Justin
Hetzel, Manuel W
Bryant, Miranda
Siba, Peter M
Mueller, Ivo
author_facet Pulford, Justin
Hetzel, Manuel W
Bryant, Miranda
Siba, Peter M
Mueller, Ivo
author_sort Pulford, Justin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A review of the barriers to mosquito net use in malaria-endemic countries has yet to be presented in the published literature despite considerable research interest in this area. This paper partly addresses this gap by reviewing one component of the evidence base; namely, published research pertaining to self-reported reasons for not using a mosquito net among net 'owning' individuals. It was anticipated that the review findings would potentially inform an intervention or range of interventions best suited to promoting greater net use amongst this group. METHOD: Studies were sought via a search of the Medline database. The key inclusion criteria were: that study participants could be identified as owning a mosquito net or having a mosquito net available for use; that these participants on one or more occasions were identified or self-reported as not using the mosquito net; and that reasons for not using the mosquito net were reported. Studies meeting these criteria were included irrespective of mosquito net type. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Discomfort, primarily due to heat, and perceived (low) mosquito density were the most widely identified reason for non-use. Social factors, such as sleeping elsewhere, or not sleeping at all, were also reported across studies as were technical factors related to mosquito net use (i.e. not being able to hang a mosquito net or finding it inconvenient to hang) and the temporary unavailability of a normally available mosquito net (primarily due to someone else using it). However, confidence in the reported findings was substantially undermined by a range of methodological limitations and a dearth of dedicated research investigation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review should be considered highly tentative until such time as greater quantities of dedicated, well-designed and reported studies are available in the published literature. The current evidence-base is not sufficient in scope or quality to reliably inform mosquito net promoting interventions or campaigns targeted at individuals who own, but do not (reliably) use, mosquito nets.
format Text
id pubmed-3080352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30803522011-04-21 Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature Pulford, Justin Hetzel, Manuel W Bryant, Miranda Siba, Peter M Mueller, Ivo Malar J Review BACKGROUND: A review of the barriers to mosquito net use in malaria-endemic countries has yet to be presented in the published literature despite considerable research interest in this area. This paper partly addresses this gap by reviewing one component of the evidence base; namely, published research pertaining to self-reported reasons for not using a mosquito net among net 'owning' individuals. It was anticipated that the review findings would potentially inform an intervention or range of interventions best suited to promoting greater net use amongst this group. METHOD: Studies were sought via a search of the Medline database. The key inclusion criteria were: that study participants could be identified as owning a mosquito net or having a mosquito net available for use; that these participants on one or more occasions were identified or self-reported as not using the mosquito net; and that reasons for not using the mosquito net were reported. Studies meeting these criteria were included irrespective of mosquito net type. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Discomfort, primarily due to heat, and perceived (low) mosquito density were the most widely identified reason for non-use. Social factors, such as sleeping elsewhere, or not sleeping at all, were also reported across studies as were technical factors related to mosquito net use (i.e. not being able to hang a mosquito net or finding it inconvenient to hang) and the temporary unavailability of a normally available mosquito net (primarily due to someone else using it). However, confidence in the reported findings was substantially undermined by a range of methodological limitations and a dearth of dedicated research investigation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review should be considered highly tentative until such time as greater quantities of dedicated, well-designed and reported studies are available in the published literature. The current evidence-base is not sufficient in scope or quality to reliably inform mosquito net promoting interventions or campaigns targeted at individuals who own, but do not (reliably) use, mosquito nets. BioMed Central 2011-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3080352/ /pubmed/21477376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-83 Text en Copyright ©2011 Pulford et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Pulford, Justin
Hetzel, Manuel W
Bryant, Miranda
Siba, Peter M
Mueller, Ivo
Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature
title Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature
title_full Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature
title_fullStr Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature
title_full_unstemmed Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature
title_short Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature
title_sort reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-83
work_keys_str_mv AT pulfordjustin reportedreasonsfornotusingamosquitonetwhenoneisavailableareviewofthepublishedliterature
AT hetzelmanuelw reportedreasonsfornotusingamosquitonetwhenoneisavailableareviewofthepublishedliterature
AT bryantmiranda reportedreasonsfornotusingamosquitonetwhenoneisavailableareviewofthepublishedliterature
AT sibapeterm reportedreasonsfornotusingamosquitonetwhenoneisavailableareviewofthepublishedliterature
AT muellerivo reportedreasonsfornotusingamosquitonetwhenoneisavailableareviewofthepublishedliterature