Cargando…

Modelling the Protective Efficacy of Alternative Delivery Schedules for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Infants and Children

BACKGROUND: Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended by WHO where malaria incidence in infancy is high and SP resistance is low. The current delivery strategy is via routine Expanded Program on Immunisation contacts during infancy (EPI-IP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cairns, Matthew, Ghani, Azra, Okell, Lucy, Gosling, Roly, Carneiro, Ilona, Anto, Francis, Asoala, Victor, Owusu-Agyei, Seth, Greenwood, Brian, Chandramohan, Daniel, Milligan, Paul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018947
_version_ 1782202111735365632
author Cairns, Matthew
Ghani, Azra
Okell, Lucy
Gosling, Roly
Carneiro, Ilona
Anto, Francis
Asoala, Victor
Owusu-Agyei, Seth
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Milligan, Paul
author_facet Cairns, Matthew
Ghani, Azra
Okell, Lucy
Gosling, Roly
Carneiro, Ilona
Anto, Francis
Asoala, Victor
Owusu-Agyei, Seth
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Milligan, Paul
author_sort Cairns, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended by WHO where malaria incidence in infancy is high and SP resistance is low. The current delivery strategy is via routine Expanded Program on Immunisation contacts during infancy (EPI-IPTi). However, improvements to this approach may be possible where malaria transmission is seasonal, or where the malaria burden lies mainly outside infancy. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A mathematical model was developed to estimate the protective efficacy (PE) of IPT against clinical malaria in children aged 2-24 months, using entomological and epidemiological data from an EPI-IPTi trial in Navrongo, Ghana to parameterise the model. The protection achieved by seasonally-targeted IPT in infants (sIPTi), seasonal IPT in children (sIPTc), and by case-management with long-acting artemisinin combination therapies (LA-ACTs) was predicted for Navrongo and for sites with different transmission intensity and seasonality. In Navrongo, the predicted PE of sIPTi was 26% by 24 months of age, compared to 16% with EPI-IPTi. sIPTc given to all children under 2 years would provide PE of 52% by 24 months of age. Seasonally-targeted IPT retained its advantages in a range of transmission patterns. Under certain circumstances, LA-ACTs for case-management may provide similar protection to EPI-IPTi. However, EPI-IPTi or sIPT combined with LA-ACTs would be substantially more protective than either strategy used alone. CONCLUSION: Delivery of IPT to infants via the EPI is sub-optimal because individuals are not protected by IPT at the time of highest malaria risk, and because older children are not protected. Alternative delivery strategies to the EPI are needed where transmission varies seasonally or the malaria burden extends beyond infancy. Long-acting ACTs may also make important reductions in malaria incidence. However, delivery systems must be developed to ensure that both forms of chemoprevention reach the individuals who are most exposed to malaria.
format Text
id pubmed-3080380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30803802011-04-29 Modelling the Protective Efficacy of Alternative Delivery Schedules for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Infants and Children Cairns, Matthew Ghani, Azra Okell, Lucy Gosling, Roly Carneiro, Ilona Anto, Francis Asoala, Victor Owusu-Agyei, Seth Greenwood, Brian Chandramohan, Daniel Milligan, Paul PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended by WHO where malaria incidence in infancy is high and SP resistance is low. The current delivery strategy is via routine Expanded Program on Immunisation contacts during infancy (EPI-IPTi). However, improvements to this approach may be possible where malaria transmission is seasonal, or where the malaria burden lies mainly outside infancy. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A mathematical model was developed to estimate the protective efficacy (PE) of IPT against clinical malaria in children aged 2-24 months, using entomological and epidemiological data from an EPI-IPTi trial in Navrongo, Ghana to parameterise the model. The protection achieved by seasonally-targeted IPT in infants (sIPTi), seasonal IPT in children (sIPTc), and by case-management with long-acting artemisinin combination therapies (LA-ACTs) was predicted for Navrongo and for sites with different transmission intensity and seasonality. In Navrongo, the predicted PE of sIPTi was 26% by 24 months of age, compared to 16% with EPI-IPTi. sIPTc given to all children under 2 years would provide PE of 52% by 24 months of age. Seasonally-targeted IPT retained its advantages in a range of transmission patterns. Under certain circumstances, LA-ACTs for case-management may provide similar protection to EPI-IPTi. However, EPI-IPTi or sIPT combined with LA-ACTs would be substantially more protective than either strategy used alone. CONCLUSION: Delivery of IPT to infants via the EPI is sub-optimal because individuals are not protected by IPT at the time of highest malaria risk, and because older children are not protected. Alternative delivery strategies to the EPI are needed where transmission varies seasonally or the malaria burden extends beyond infancy. Long-acting ACTs may also make important reductions in malaria incidence. However, delivery systems must be developed to ensure that both forms of chemoprevention reach the individuals who are most exposed to malaria. Public Library of Science 2011-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3080380/ /pubmed/21533088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018947 Text en Cairns et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cairns, Matthew
Ghani, Azra
Okell, Lucy
Gosling, Roly
Carneiro, Ilona
Anto, Francis
Asoala, Victor
Owusu-Agyei, Seth
Greenwood, Brian
Chandramohan, Daniel
Milligan, Paul
Modelling the Protective Efficacy of Alternative Delivery Schedules for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Infants and Children
title Modelling the Protective Efficacy of Alternative Delivery Schedules for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Infants and Children
title_full Modelling the Protective Efficacy of Alternative Delivery Schedules for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Infants and Children
title_fullStr Modelling the Protective Efficacy of Alternative Delivery Schedules for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Infants and Children
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the Protective Efficacy of Alternative Delivery Schedules for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Infants and Children
title_short Modelling the Protective Efficacy of Alternative Delivery Schedules for Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Infants and Children
title_sort modelling the protective efficacy of alternative delivery schedules for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in infants and children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3080380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21533088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018947
work_keys_str_mv AT cairnsmatthew modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT ghaniazra modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT okelllucy modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT goslingroly modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT carneiroilona modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT antofrancis modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT asoalavictor modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT owusuagyeiseth modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT greenwoodbrian modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT chandramohandaniel modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren
AT milliganpaul modellingtheprotectiveefficacyofalternativedeliveryschedulesforintermittentpreventivetreatmentofmalariaininfantsandchildren